
Originally Posted by
natepro
These are.. weird criticisms.
There's more involved in teaching than just actively teaching. It's not improv, you can't just run up there, get a suggestion from the audience and start doing it and hope everything will turn out okay.
Per the Bureau of Labor Statistics, teachers are more likely than other full time workers to work on a Sunday, to do some work at home or in more than one location, and more likely to have more than one job. Because of that, the average teacher works 54 hours per week, and one in four work more than 60 hours a week.
Maybe we should make them all hourly employees, and see how much we're paying them for 10-20 hours of overtime each week?
And this is ignoring the level of education required, as well.
As for "bonuses based on student outcomes," that's how you end up with people teaching to the test. I thought we learned that lesson with No Child Left Behind, but perhaps not. Long story short: it doesn't work.
Because teachers have to do…lesson planning!
We always fall behind with work because our day doesn’t really get started until 9am despite an 8am start time. Kids have parents that don’t care about punctuality and send them whenever. Sure the 7/20 kids who are there on time get the extra help but how can you do an entire lesson when half of the class isn’t even there?
it’s funny that there’s a criticism of teachers not doing anything when in reality, we don’t even have enough time in the day to get everything done and is that our fault? Not really, blame the administration and parents.
This doesn’t even account for the multiple meetings every week and unlike a lot of professions, we can’t even work from home.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If Trump can become president with no political background then I don't understand why I need a resumé