See, this is all a very weird argument for you to make, because you were fully on board with the American Medical Association administering health insurance for the entire country despite the fact that they have no experience operating a health insurance plan. All these things I've said about the ADA? You said the same thing about the AMA and health insurance.
You:
Me:
You:
Me:
Over and over again you advocated for the AMA taking over national health insurance.
And when anyone pointed out to you that they have no experience doing this...
...you either called it a "deflection," or tried to change the subject to claim (without evidence, of course) that the real issue was people's apathy, or you just didn't reply to it at all.
I know you're not going to actually address any of this. You know you're not actually going to address any of this. Hell, you're not even reading this part, because Christ knows you've given no indication you have the ability to stick with something longer than three or four lines; but that's okay. The inherent contradiction in your own arguments has been exposed despite the fact that your reply will have nothing to do with anything I said here.
Thanks for your help in exposing you once again.
