Sponsored Links |
|
He’ll end up at $45mil AAV with 40% GTD.
No, Hurts has 1 more year left on his rookie deal. It’s likely they let him play it out and then franchise him ($49M franchise tag). Or they go into the season and sign him to a new contract during the season.
Regardless of Baltimore signs Jackson or as it was mentioned a while ago, they trade Jackson, either way his new contract sets the market for Hurts. The Eagles should want to get a new deal done before Burrow signs his contract or Allen/Herbert sign theirs.
Sponsored Links |
|
Then just say what you mean. When you talk in circles and keep moving the goalpost people are going to interpret what you’re saying. If you were just clear in what you say and what you mean you wouldn’t have people misinterpreting what you say.
So what exactly are you saying in regards to Hurts. That way everyone is clear.
You are assuming way too much about success rates drafting QBs. Even with the top overall pick it's not guaranteed to find a solid player. If it was just easy to draft a rookie QB and roll with them every team would be doing that instead of locking up good QBs when they have the chance. Ask Denver.
It's not a bad thought logically, with the cheap QB cap hit to build a solid team around, but hitting on QBs isn't just some easy thing. Hurts was a great find for Philly. They're more likely to end up with someone like Gabbert, Haskins or Lock given where they'll be picking anyway.
Unless you can show me where I said that, I have not even considered trading hurts this season except for what I just proposed yesterday. Now, was there talk last season and then the off-season on whether or not Kurt could be the guy, yes, but I’m not sure any trade mentioning happened until yesterday. Now I’m pretty sure most Eagles fans have said if he wasn’t going to be the guy in the Eagles are still in great position due to draft capital and cap space next year but you seem to be combining arguments.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sponsored Links |
|