Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    iowa
    Posts
    10,829

    Week 3 Green Bay Packers (1-1) vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers (2-0)





    Players To Watch


    Quarterback

    ~VS~


    Tom Bray, QB #12 402 Yards / 2 TD 1 INT / 59 CMP% / 82.8 QB Rating
    Aaron Rodgers, QB #12 - 429 Yards / 2 TD 1 INT / 69.5 CMP% / 94.5 Rating

    Running Back

    ~VS~


    Leonard Fournette, RB #7 - 192 Yards / 45 Carries/ 5.0 YPC/ 1 TD
    Aaron Jones, RB #33 - 181 Yards / 29 Carries/ 9.1 YPC/ 1 TD

    Wide Receiver

    ~VS~


    Mike Evans, WR #13 - 8 Catches / 132 Yards / 1 TD
    Sammy Watkins, WR #11 - 6 Catches / 111 Yards / 0 TD


    Tight End

    ~VS~


    Cameron Brate, TE #84 - 2 Catches / 16 Yards / 0 TD
    Robert Tonyan, TE #85 - 5 Catches / 47 Yards / 0 TD

    Defensive Line

    ~VS~


    Akiem Hicks, DE #96 - 5 Tackles / 0.0 Sacks / 0 PD / 0 FF
    Kenny Clark, DE #97 - 5 Tackles / 0.0 Sacks / 0 PD / 0 FF


    Linebacker

    ~VS~


    Devin White, LB #45 - 19 Tackles / 3.0 Sacks/ 2 PD / 0 INT / 1 FF
    Quay Walker, LB #7 - 13 Tackles / 0.0 Sacks / 0 INT / 1 PD / 0 FF


    Defensive Back

    ~VS~


    Carlton Davis III #24 - 14 Tackles / 0 INT / 2 PDEF / 0.0 Sack / 0 FF
    Jaire Alexander CB #23 - 8 Tackles / 1 INT / 1 PDEF / 0 Sack

    Kicker

    ~VS~


    Ryan Succop, K #3 - 6 FGM / 7 FGA / 3 XPM / 3 XPA
    Mason Crosby, K #2 - 2 FGM / 2 FGA / 4 XPM / 4 XPA

    Click For More Stats



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Gainesville, Florida
    Posts
    935
    Does R Gary ever line up over the LT? Seems as if he’s always on the other side over the RT. If so I’m just curious as to why? Why not move him around? There’s prob a lot I don’t fully understand or see for the matter, I was just curious if we’d see him play against possibly a backup as opposed to going against Whirfs most of game.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    5,694
    Gonna be a tough game to win. But not having Mike Evan’s will help. Would love to see the offense click otherwise we are in big trouble. Defense needs a couple TO.


    Not confident here.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    14,343
    Quote Originally Posted by MFNkingAC View Post
    Does R Gary ever line up over the LT? Seems as if he’s always on the other side over the RT. If so I’m just curious as to why? Why not move him around? There’s prob a lot I don’t fully understand or see for the matter, I was just curious if we’d see him play against possibly a backup as opposed to going against Whirfs most of game.
    To be fair Preston's pass rush win rate is basically as good as Gary's. I know it doesn't matter as much in obvious passing situations, so you could move him, but to me it makes sense to keep each guy on a side, especially when you have two good players. If we had Gary only and not smith, maybe moving him makes more sense. But with 2 at least decent players, take the thinking out of it and let them do what's natural for them, which should be rushing from the side they are used to. But also then taking into account run reaponsibilities and all that stuff too. It's easier to not have to think about which shoulder to protect and where the help lbs are coming from. Not saying it's hard switching sides and doing that, but adding any later of complexity could slow down their thought process for a split second.


    Joe Barry is stubborn and doesn't like to make adjustments. That frustrates me quite often. But the flipside argument to that is when you simplify schemes and responsibilities, it allows guys to think less and play faster.

    He needs to find that happy medium of Justin Jefferson is torching us, let's make a chance. Or we are playing nickel vs the bears 2 TE package and getting run on. Let's not keep doing that. But the general idea of simplifying is not bad.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    iowa
    Posts
    10,829
    According to Bill Huber of SI, DB69 is expected to play against Tampa Bay

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,088
    i would love to see a scheme that throws the WR rookies open but as it is i see a low scoring game. Green Bay should win it with the D bringing the game home but i see a close game going to Tampa.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    1,445
    Sorry but this team is trash.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,088
    Quote Originally Posted by bigfishguy85 View Post
    Sorry but this team is trash.
    the offense moved very well in the first series. Doubs looks special. would like to see some more throws to open up the run game a little more. i think Tampa is cheating the run a bit myself. still early. come on D. get some sacks.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    1,445
    Yeah the team def woke up after the d looking very soft on the first drive.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    1,445
    Well that sucked…

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    1,445
    That could have been a game changer

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    iowa
    Posts
    10,829
    this is where the game really starts because the Bucs are a 2nd half team

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    iowa
    Posts
    10,829
    nice to have a punter who can actually pooch kick

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    1,445
    Its like we did everything we could to try and lose the game.

    I wanna know what the deal is with injuries. Watkins done already. Watson out. DB disnt play much. What is it with this team?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,088
    Quote Originally Posted by bigfishguy85 View Post
    Its like we did everything we could to try and lose the game.

    I wanna know what the deal is with injuries. Watkins done already. Watson out. DB disnt play much. What is it with this team?
    i was not the biggest Watkins fan. seeing him injured is the norm and not the exception. i think they went cautious with Watson. Doubs had a monster game as did Tonyan. the run game sucked balls. i think Tampa realized if the stopped the run the pass game would be gone. it's great to have a two headed monster but if both backs can't run for 40 yards apiece what good is the scheme? the D unit is puzzling to me. greatly so. yeah i get Brady is one of the best but Tampa was down to nothing at WR. i would have thought it to be a top 5 D unit. they are playing worse than that.
    Last edited by alabastertubby; 09-26-2022 at 03:48 AM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •