Joe Biden's Presidency

[dbroncos78087]

Looking at who is getting upset at a hypothetical and non-existent attempt to remove gas stoves. You won’t believe who won’t be affected by this fictional push.

[Kenny Powders]

Looking at who is getting upset at a hypothetical and non-existent attempt to remove gas stoves. You won’t believe who won’t be affected by this fictional push.

Who's upset about gas stoves? And why?

Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk

[dbroncos78087]

Who's upset about gas stoves? And why?

Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk

Conservatives are getting upset that they say the government is going to ban gas stoves. As for why, because they are operating off one brain with one brain cell.

[natepro]

Imagine that. A person has real life-experience not requiring a google search.
Spazz is a shortening of the word spastic. That is the word that you suggested that I was looking for, no?

Leave it to you to ignore what was said so you can substitute in something you find easier to reply to.

People having real world experience is not the problem.

You having real world experience on virtually everything that comes up in here is the problem, especially when you've already been caught in a lie to make yourself sound like something kind of authority on the subject when you clearly have no idea what you're talking about.

As a side note, I doubt people work cerebral palsy want to be referred to as "patient" when they're just a student going to a school. Thankfully that probably didn't actually happen, so it's just an imaginary kid you apparently refer to as "patient" when they're just going about their life.

[natepro]

nate, was this not something you posted earlier?
Lying liar says what?

spaz
/spaz/
noun
noun: spazz

an incompetent or uncoordinated person.

verbUS
verb: spazz

lose physical or emotional control.


spazz

1.) adj. word used to describe someone who you think is completely idiotic, and is acting immaturely or ********.
2.) v. to flip out at something, yell and scream, usually completely random words.


The word you're looking for, liar, is "spastic." You'll notice that's not what he said. But you won't admit that, because you're a liar.

You understand that I would have to say I didn't post that to be a liar, right? Is this why you won't admit to your lie, because you don't understand the concept of it?

[mngopher35]

Leave it to you to ignore what was said so you can substitute in something you find easier to reply to.

People having real world experience is not the problem.

You having real world experience on virtually everything that comes up in here is the problem, especially when you've already been caught in a lie to make yourself sound like something kind of authority on the subject when you clearly have no idea what you're talking about.

As a side note, I doubt people work cerebral palsy want to be referred to as "patient" when they're just a student going to a school. Thankfully that probably didn't actually happen, so it's just an imaginary kid you apparently refer to as "patient" when they're just going about their life.

Are you saying the habitual liar might be doing so about all these “experiences” he claims to have (despite constantly having no clue on the subject) as a way to deflect?

No way, I’m shocked.

[catman]

OK gophers, what details do you need?

[catman]

You understand that I would have to say I didn't post that to be a liar, right? Is this why you won't admit to your lie, because you don't understand the concept of it?

nate you have the admission you are going to get. Either accept it or not. It doesn't matter to me at all.
What part of "Spazz" being short for spastic, and being a derogatory term for CP sufferers don't you understand?
Just don't use derogatory terms.

[natepro]

OK gophers, what details do you need?

You could always start by admitting you lied about helping undocumented immigrants become citizens.

[valade16]

Who's upset about gas stoves? And why?

Data has come out that gas stoves increase the rates and risk of asthma and decreased cognitive function in children so regulators are trying to figure out what to do. Conservatives, upon hearing the news, have flown into an intense rage at the idea they could lose their gas stove, which unbeknownst to everyone was their most sacred possession.

[natepro]

nate you have the admission you are going to get. Either accept it or not. It doesn't matter to me at all.
What part of "Spazz" being short for spastic, and being a derogatory term for CP sufferers don't you understand?
Just don't use derogatory terms.

It's obvious lying doesn't matter to you, given the freedom with which you do it.

You've apparently forgotten that I wasn't the one that said it.

[natepro]

Data has come out that gas stoves increase the rates and risk of asthma and decreased cognitive function in children so regulators are trying to figure out what to do. Conservatives, upon hearing the news, have flown into an intense rage at the idea they could lose their gas stove, which unbeknownst to everyone was their most sacred possession.

It's not even really new information, and proper ventilation is a big part of the problem, but so many home kitchens have vents above their stoves that don't actually go outside.

Cooking with gas is so much better than electric, but not ending up with asthma or cognitive problems is even better so..

At this point, we should be very thankful we got rid of leaded gasoline when we did, cause there's no doubt it would be the next thing conservatives were upset over if it happened now.

[catman]

You could always start by admitting you lied about helping undocumented immigrants become citizens.

I did.

[catman]

It's obvious lying doesn't matter to you, given the freedom with which you do it.

You've apparently forgotten that I wasn't the one that said it.

No you weren't. You jumped in to defend the person that did. Do you agree that "Spazz" is a derogatory term for CP sufferers?

[natepro]

I did.

Sure about that? Have you forgotten your answer to this question?

So the next time you try to claim you don't lie, I can simply point to this "admission" that shows otherwise. Right?

And by the way, wrong. You cannot use this admission to prove anything other than the fact that you appear to be a bit whiney.

If it doesn't demonstrate that you lie, then it's not an admission to lying. Would you like to change your answer to that question?