Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 902 of 1050 FirstFirst ... 4028028528929009019029039049129521002 ... LastLast
Results 13,516 to 13,530 of 15742
  1. #13516
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    America
    Posts
    110,086
    Imagine publicly embarrassing yourself like this:


  2. #13517
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    54,119
    ^^^Same dude who is spearheading the investigation into the Biden family. Weird how he pays attention to one investigation so intently that may or may not involve the current president while he completely ignores all the investigations into the previous president.

  3. #13518
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    50,678
    He almost looks like the guy Tapper had to inform, on air, that you don't have to take the oath of office on the Bible.


    "It is a grotesque parody of the bazaar at Marrakech, as if dumb animals had been granted only the amount of sentience required to mock humanity."

  4. #13519
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    America
    Posts
    110,086
    I'm hearing that North Carolina will be the 40th state in the union to expand Medicaid under the Obamacare rules. It passed the House and Senate of the state by a wide margin with Democratic governor Roy Cooper's support. Another massive victory for the least represented constituency in our country: the extremely poor.
    Quote Originally Posted by brett05 View Post
    the delays of the courts needs to end at some point.
    Quote Originally Posted by dbroncos78087 View Post
    And if people got **** counsel, well they had to die so the court could move faster…but tell me again how pro-life you are!
    I was told there would be pro-life! Not pro-death!
    ___

    Please remember not to reply to me if I'm not replying to you...you know who you are.

  5. #13520
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    10,373
    Quote Originally Posted by metswon69 View Post
    Its okay. Boebert included transgenders in the bill. She didn't forget.

    https://thehill.com/homenews/house/3...ill-of-rights/



    Not that I expect any of this to pass in the Senate.
    Why would it pass the Senate? The controlling party does not care about females.
    My Ignore List: bklynny67, crovash, nastynice, natepro, OhSoSlick, spliff(TONE), zmaster52

  6. #13521
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    54,119
    Quote Originally Posted by brett05 View Post
    Why would it pass the Senate? The controlling party does not care about females.
    It won't probably see the Senate floor but I don't know where your idea of Democrats not caring about females comes from. I don't see them forcing women to have children under almost all circumstances for example.

  7. #13522
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    10,373
    Quote Originally Posted by metswon69 View Post
    It won't probably see the Senate floor but I don't know where your idea of Democrats not caring about females comes from. I don't see them forcing women to have children under almost all circumstances for example.
    One party actually saves the lives of females. It's not yours.
    My Ignore List: bklynny67, crovash, nastynice, natepro, OhSoSlick, spliff(TONE), zmaster52

  8. #13523
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    54,119
    Quote Originally Posted by brett05 View Post
    One party actually saves the lives of females. It's not yours.
    Which females?

    Can you dispute the fact that abortion limitations put certain female's lives in danger? Is that saving the lives of women?

  9. #13524
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    50,678
    Quote Originally Posted by metswon69 View Post
    It won't probably see the Senate floor but I don't know where your idea of Democrats not caring about females comes from. I don't see them forcing women to have children under almost all circumstances for example.
    Republicans care deeply about women; when the House reauthorized the Violence Against Women Act in 2021 (that had lapsed under Trump) 0 Democrats voted against it, but 172 Republicans did.

    Their biggest objection, and this is going to shock you, was closing the "boyfriend loophole." While spouses and partners that live together or have a child together are prohibited from owning a gun if they've been convicted of or are under a restraining order for domestic violence, that doesn't apply to a partner that commits domestic violence but isn't married to or living with the person, or doesn't have a child with them.

    Republicans, apparently, think that as long as a domestic abuser hasn't made some kind of commitment to the person they're abusing they should be allowed to own all the guns they want. And sure, in 54% of cases where four or more people are shot and killed the shooter killed a former partner or family member, and sure more than half of women killed by guns are killed by a former partner or family member, and sure in a home where domestic violence occurs the chances of female homicide increase by nearly 500%, but think of the guns! We need these people to have them, and just because they're more likely to use that gun to kill the person they're already abusing, and probably a few other people for good measure, doesn't mean we should stop them from having it.

    Because Republicans super duper extra strength care about women.


    "It is a grotesque parody of the bazaar at Marrakech, as if dumb animals had been granted only the amount of sentience required to mock humanity."

  10. #13525
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    America
    Posts
    110,086
    Quote Originally Posted by natepro View Post
    Republicans care deeply about women; when the House reauthorized the Violence Against Women Act in 2021 (that had lapsed under Trump) 0 Democrats voted against it, but 172 Republicans did.

    Their biggest objection, and this is going to shock you, was closing the "boyfriend loophole." While spouses and partners that live together or have a child together are prohibited from owning a gun if they've been convicted of or are under a restraining order for domestic violence, that doesn't apply to a partner that commits domestic violence but isn't married to or living with the person, or doesn't have a child with them.

    Republicans, apparently, think that as long as a domestic abuser hasn't made some kind of commitment to the person they're abusing they should be allowed to own all the guns they want. And sure, in 54% of cases where four or more people are shot and killed the shooter killed a former partner or family member, and sure more than half of women killed by guns are killed by a former partner or family member, and sure in a home where domestic violence occurs the chances of female homicide increase by nearly 500%, but think of the guns! We need these people to have them, and just because they're more likely to use that gun to kill the person they're already abusing, and probably a few other people for good measure, doesn't mean we should stop them from having it.

    Because Republicans super duper extra strength care about women.
    Republicans care about women...they are strong fans of allowing men to support and maintain their property...
    Quote Originally Posted by brett05 View Post
    the delays of the courts needs to end at some point.
    Quote Originally Posted by dbroncos78087 View Post
    And if people got **** counsel, well they had to die so the court could move faster…but tell me again how pro-life you are!
    I was told there would be pro-life! Not pro-death!
    ___

    Please remember not to reply to me if I'm not replying to you...you know who you are.

  11. #13526
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    50,678
    Quote Originally Posted by brett05 View Post
    One party actually saves the lives of females. It's not yours.


    States with the highest maternal mortality rate:

    1. Arkansas
    2. Kentucky
    3. Alabama
    4. Tennessee
    5. Louisiana
    6. Mississippi
    7. South Carolina
    8. Georgia
    9. Arizona
    10. Nebraska
    10. Indiana (tied)
    12. Missouri
    13. Oklahoma
    14. New Jersey
    15. Texas
    16. Virginia
    17. Florida
    18. Kansas
    19. Ohio
    20. North Carolina


    States that have enacted near-total bans on abortion:

    1. Arkansas
    2. Alabama
    3. Tennessee
    4. Louisiana
    5. Mississippi
    6. Georgia
    7. Indiana
    8. Missouri
    9. Oklahoma
    10. Texas
    11. Ohio


    Crazy how much overlap there is. The most dangerous places in the country for someone to give birth, and those states want to force people to do it virtually no matter what.

    Saving lives!


    "It is a grotesque parody of the bazaar at Marrakech, as if dumb animals had been granted only the amount of sentience required to mock humanity."

  12. #13527
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    54,119
    Quote Originally Posted by natepro View Post


    States with the highest maternal mortality rate:

    1. Arkansas
    2. Kentucky
    3. Alabama
    4. Tennessee
    5. Louisiana
    6. Mississippi
    7. South Carolina
    8. Georgia
    9. Arizona
    10. Nebraska
    10. Indiana (tied)
    12. Missouri
    13. Oklahoma
    14. New Jersey
    15. Texas
    16. Virginia
    17. Florida
    18. Kansas
    19. Ohio
    20. North Carolina


    States that have enacted near-total bans on abortion:

    1. Arkansas
    2. Alabama
    3. Tennessee
    4. Louisiana
    5. Mississippi
    6. Georgia
    7. Indiana
    8. Missouri
    9. Oklahoma
    10. Texas
    11. Ohio


    Crazy how much overlap there is. The most dangerous places in the country for someone to give birth, and those states want to force people to do it virtually no matter what.

    Saving lives!
    Not that he will acknowledge any of what you wrote because its "lapdog vomit" material according to him. Nor did he have anything to back up his point about leftists not caring about females.

  13. #13528
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    50,678
    Quote Originally Posted by metswon69 View Post
    Not that he will acknowledge any of what you wrote because its "lapdog vomit" material according to him. Nor did he have anything to back up his point about leftists not caring about females.
    He won't acknowledge anything, ever. Objective facts very clearly don't exist for him.


    "It is a grotesque parody of the bazaar at Marrakech, as if dumb animals had been granted only the amount of sentience required to mock humanity."

  14. #13529
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
    Posts
    16,525
    Here is the thing about abortion, Roe v. Wade, whatever you want to call it: If you are a man, and care one bit about it, I question your manhood. It does not affect you one bit.

    Secondly, if you are a woman at the age of 40+, you shouldn't care at all because it is likely you aren't getting pregnant. My mom is approaching 70 and she could care less about Roe v. Wade. Her thoughts on it are basically, "Not like I am getting pregnant at my age."

    I accept the fact that there should be some exceptions to the rule like rape cases and things of that nature. The problem with most of these women who want to get abortions are they are so quick to want to jump into the sack with their boyfriends and they don't want the responsibility.
    Eichel Tower

  15. #13530
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    54,119
    Quote Originally Posted by ccugrad1 View Post
    Here is the thing about abortion, Roe v. Wade, whatever you want to call it: If you are a man, and care one bit about it, I question your manhood. It does not affect you one bit.

    Secondly, if you are a woman at the age of 40+, you shouldn't care at all because it is likely you aren't getting pregnant. My mom is approaching 70 and she could care less about Roe v. Wade. Her thoughts on it are basically, "Not like I am getting pregnant at my age."

    I accept the fact that there should be some exceptions to the rule like rape cases and things of that nature. The problem with most of these women who want to get abortions are they are so quick to want to jump into the sack with their boyfriends and they don't want the responsibility.
    Yes, because the peak epitome of masculinity is showing complete apathy towards the rights of females. I know you just want to hear yourself talk on this one without any counter input but this ain't it, Jack.

    What sense does your second paragraph make btw? You mean to tell women over a certain age shouldn't care about fellow female's reproductive rights? Seriously?

    Way to be a complete misogynist btw without any understanding of the nuances involved with having children.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •