Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 56 of 105 FirstFirst ... 646545556575866 ... LastLast
Results 826 to 840 of 1569
  1. #826
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    39,258
    Quote Originally Posted by natepro View Post
    Using the shadow docket to let this law go into effect by a majority vote. It's a pretty good indication of how they'll vote when this case reaches them, and I don't know of any way someone could argue that Roe and the subsequent rulings are in effect if this law is allowed to stand. It's literally in direct contradiction to Roe.
    But since this law specifically forbids the state from enforcing it is it in opposition to Roe v Wade?

  2. #827
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    39,258
    Quote Originally Posted by valade16 View Post
    Which of those that declined to grant the injunction do you see reversing course and upholding Roe?
    The lack of action from the court on an injunction doesn't necessarily portend what they will do when (if) they do accept the case in the future.

  3. #828
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    44,018
    Quote Originally Posted by Scoots View Post
    The lack of action from the court on an injunction doesn't necessarily portend what they will do when (if) they do accept the case in the future.
    It also doesn’t necessarily mean they will uphold Roe either.

    I ask again, which of the Justices that declined the injunction do you think would decide to uphold Roe?

  4. #829
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    America
    Posts
    101,431
    Quote Originally Posted by brett05 View Post
    Check entry #2 you slaugther lover.

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/murder
    That is a colloquial definition. Are you going to try to hinge the definition of murder to include a group of crows too?

  5. #830
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    5,015
    Quote Originally Posted by dbroncos78087 View Post
    That is a colloquial definition. Are you going to try to hinge the definition of murder to include a group of crows too?
    You all are a master at ducking the obvious. Truly the best at the craft.
    My Ignore List: bklynny67, nastynice, OhSoSlick, spliff(TONE), zmaster52

  6. #831
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    America
    Posts
    101,431
    Quote Originally Posted by brett05 View Post
    You all are a master at ducking the obvious. Truly the best at the craft.
    Well it was quite obvious based on the definition you quoted that it was a more colloquial or common usage definition. Pointing that out should surprise absolutely no one.

  7. #832
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    5,015
    Quote Originally Posted by dbroncos78087 View Post
    Well it was quite obvious based on the definition you quoted that it was a more colloquial or common usage definition. Pointing that out should surprise absolutely no one.
    Except it's not stated there anywhere and I also added another source which specifically does not mention a need for a law (it did mention the definition in criminal law including homicide which was outside of the criminal law example).

    Stop supporting murder please. Not a hard ask at all.
    My Ignore List: bklynny67, nastynice, OhSoSlick, spliff(TONE), zmaster52

  8. #833
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    39,258
    Quote Originally Posted by valade16 View Post
    It also doesn’t necessarily mean they will uphold Roe either.

    I ask again, which of the Justices that declined the injunction do you think would decide to uphold Roe?
    How would I know? My question was how do you know how they will decide?

  9. #834
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    44,018
    Quote Originally Posted by Scoots View Post
    How would I know? My question was how do you know how they will decide?
    No, but I’m not claiming to. I’m claiming I think they will (or might) decide a certain way. Are you saying you have zero ability to form an opinion on something that may happen in the future? If the Supreme Court rules the Mississippi law is OK would you think it more likely they’ll uphold Texas’ law or overturn Roe?
    Last edited by valade16; 09-17-2021 at 01:36 PM.

  10. #835
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Central Iowa
    Posts
    7,164
    Quote Originally Posted by natepro View Post
    It will prevent them from enforcing it until the question of constitutionality is decided? It's a pretty common practice.
    The supreme court already decided that, or have you forgotten?

  11. #836
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    parts unknown
    Posts
    61,751
    Quote Originally Posted by catman View Post
    The supreme court already decided that, or have you forgotten?
    you should write courtroom dramas.
    Rep Power: 0




    Quote Originally Posted by Raps08-09 Champ View Post
    My dick is named 'Ewing'.

  12. #837
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    44,018
    Quote Originally Posted by catman View Post
    The supreme court already decided that, or have you forgotten?
    What did the Supreme Court decide? They definitely did not decide whether the law was constitutional…

  13. #838
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    America
    Posts
    101,431
    Quote Originally Posted by brett05 View Post
    Except it's not stated there anywhere and I also added another source which specifically does not mention a need for a law (it did mention the definition in criminal law including homicide which was outside of the criminal law example).

    Stop supporting murder please. Not a hard ask at all.
    I don’t support murder so we’re good! Now since you support life in all cases, I hope you don’t eat meat or even vegetables.

  14. #839
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    41,278
    Quote Originally Posted by catman View Post
    The supreme court already decided that, or have you forgotten?
    I've already addressed this.

  15. #840
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    41,278
    Quote Originally Posted by Scoots View Post
    But since this law specifically forbids the state from enforcing it is it in opposition to Roe v Wade?
    Two things:

    1. There are professional, licensing consequences involved for doctors and pharmacists involved in violating the law. That is done by the state.

    2. Imagine a state doing this with any other Constitutional right. Report on a news story and you can be sued for $10,000. Go to a church and you can be sued for $10,000. If you can be sued, lose, and have to pay attorneys fees, then there is no universe in which you can call that a right you have the free exercise of.

Page 56 of 105 FirstFirst ... 646545556575866 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •