Texas' restrictive abortion law takes effect after SCOTUS deadline to stop it passes.

[natepro]

who is spliff? Is it the one on my ignore list whose posts I don't see? You were a mod. Do you know how this site works at all?

Your typical go to...Let's call anything that makes me look bad a game played by someone else.

Look at him acting like he can't see his own sig.

[metswon69]

I have answered that multiple times in the past. Keep thinking I have not.

Again, abortion on demand existed prior to the overturn. Where is the step away from that? Answer is non-existent.

Its only the left that is completely vile in respect to abortion when you consistently ignore all the reasons the abortion decision is made and pretend like not allowing an abortion in the case of rape isn't vile. You try to pretend like you're the reasonable one here when you are most certainly not.

There were repercussions to said late stage abortions before. Now there are repercussions to abortions in almost all cases depending on what state you reside in. The fact that you think the child being born is the only thing that matters in an incredibly complex decision is nonsensical but hey that's what you do best. Double down on nonsense.

[dbroncos78087]

So when you post something that is "VaLiD" when it's not, then what?

Can you clear up what this has to do with the Texas abortion law?

[nyyfan555]

So when you post something that is "VaLiD" when it's not, then what?

Ah, now I see. Reality is not "valid" for you. Got it.

Just a quick question: how many children have you fostered or adopted? You seem to care very much for them.

Incoming deflection in 3....2....1.....

[natepro]

It shows the time when someone is no longer deserved of a response. You are working your way being added. Ask the folks on my list how many sites they have been banned from. Go ahead. Start with spliff(tone)

Again, you are the one that does not negotiate and you've shown nothing to change that. It's what those in the camp of killing the innocent do.

As someone who has the honor of being on his ignore list, I can answer this: I haven't been banned from any sites. I'm not even sure what sites I'm expected to be banned from, or what that has to do with Brett needing a safe space.

[spliff(TONE)]

The term you want is derailment and the person you want is yourself. If you can't stick to the topic of the Texas abortion law or even if you expand that to just abortion that is derailment and it is what you and others like you do all the time.

It's not how quality of life is after birth. The topic is abortion.

This right here shows how you can't be spoken to, can't be civil, don't want to actually negotiate.

Where's catman? Backseat modding is not allowed on this site.

[brett05]

Its only the left that is completely vile in respect to abortion when you consistently ignore all the reasons the abortion decision is made and pretend like not allowing an abortion in the case of rape isn't vile. You try to pretend like you're the reasonable one here when you are most certainly not.

There were repercussions to said late stage abortions before. Now there are repercussions to abortions in almost all cases depending on what state you reside in. The fact that you think the child being born is the only thing that matters in an incredibly complex decision is nonsensical but hey that's what you do best. Double down on nonsense.

none of that answers the question. typical

[brett05]

Ah, now I see. Reality is not "valid" for you. Got it.

Just a quick question: how many children have you fostered or adopted? You seem to care very much for them.

Incoming deflection in 3....2....1.....

Still awaiting your answer to the post you just quoted.

[nyyfan555]

Still awaiting your answer to the post you just quoted.

And there's the deflection. Right on cue, little guy!

[metswon69]

none of that answers the question. typical

To suggest it was abortion on demand, you would have to establish that all abortions were legal and performed after a certain period in which they were criminalized. That wasn't the case.

Secondly, who are you to suggest that people avoid questions when you have an ever-growing ignore list and consistently ignore all the valid questions in relation to why abortions are performed?

Its a nice hypocritical loop you've created for yourself.

[brett05]

And there's the deflection. Right on cue, little guy!

and the wait continues as you deflect some more.

[brett05]

To suggest it was abortion on demand, you would have to establish that all abortions were legal and performed after a certain period in which they were criminalized. That wasn't the case.

Secondly, who are you to suggest that people avoid questions when you have an ever-growing ignore list and consistently ignore all the valid questions in relation to why abortions are performed?

Its a nice hypocritical loop you've created for yourself.

Again, I am still awaiting answers to my question. Your elitist attitude is that you are better than me so beneath you to answer my questions. That's the lefties on this board.

[brett05]

Would you like to discuss a single link of yours? I'll let you even choose.

still waiting nyyfan555

[nyyfan555]

still waiting nyyfan555

I'll play along since you seem to need some mental stimulation (normally I would recommend Sesame Street for someone of your developmental stage, but let's try this).

https://everytexan.org/2022/12/05/th...ortion-access/

Texas-Sized Costs

According to the Texas Policy Evaluation Project, within the four months after the Texas abortion ban was implemented in 2021, over 5,500 Texans sought out-of-state abortions compared to about 500 during the same timeframe in 2019. In light of the 2021 laws, 52 companies — including Yelp, Lyft, Ben & Jerry’s, Lush Fresh Handmade Cosmetics, and Bumble — criticized Texas’ near-total ban on abortion, stating in an open letter that restrictions on reproductive care will be “bad for business” and hurt workers, customers, and the state’s economy.

Data show that the economic impacts of abortion bans are huge. The IWPR found that the economic loss of abortion restrictions to women and the state economy is $14.5 billion annually in Texas. Studies from the IWPR also show that eliminating abortion bans and restrictions would be beneficial not only to women and birthing people but also to the state economy overall. Eliminating all state-level abortion restrictions would result in over 82,000 women ages 15-44 entering the workforce.

In addition, state earnings would increase as a result of a larger labor force in the absence of abortion restrictions. Hispanic/Latina women would see the highest increase in state earnings — over $190 million annually. For all employed women ages 15-44, estimated earnings would increase by over $14 billion (in 2020 dollars) per year.

The economic impacts of abortion restrictions are substantiated by multiple studies and years of research. The outcomes observed by some of these studies, including reduced female labor force participation, directly impact the overall economic standing of individual states, and the country at large.

This describes the negative economic impact of abortion restrictions in texas.

Deflection in 3....2...1.....

[metswon69]

Again, I am still awaiting answers to my question. Your elitist attitude is that you are better than me so beneath you to answer my questions. That's the lefties on this board.

I answered your question. Its not abortion on demand when there were limitations (prior to Roe V Wade being overturned) where abortions could be performed.