Texas' restrictive abortion law takes effect after SCOTUS deadline to stop it passes.

[Jack the Ripper]

It fascinates me the ways you find to shoehorn that in. It's like you can't stop thinking about it.

It fascinates me that adults are not only stupid enough to believe such theories but irresponsible enough to want to push them on young children who actually know better.

[natepro]

It fascinates me that adults are not only stupid enough to believe such theories but irresponsible enough to want to push them on young children who actually know better.

Okay. Good luck with that.

[dbroncsinmo]

most posters are neither as eloquent or economical with there words as I am however the sentiment is there with of them (take a look at BOP’s response to me- it’s what he is saying)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[dbroncos78087]

Sorry man, but men are not women and women are not men. Modern gender theories aren’t offensive, they are just flat out bullcrap and shouldn’t be taught to children.

You don’t need to audition. You’re secure a spot.

[ewing]

Thank you


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Zmaster52]

You ever learn the difference between Arab and Arabic?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ewing]

You ever learn the difference between Arab and Arabic?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

obviously he was joking


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Kenny Powders]

It fascinates me that adults are not only stupid enough to believe such theories but irresponsible enough to want to push them on young children who actually know better.

Are you talking about religion? You must be

Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk

[brett05]

Not avoiding the topic. I think the circumstances in which abortion was legislated previously worked just fine. I'm not the one taking the position "protect all life". That's you. I believe there are situations where abortions (which are hardly ideal) are still outcomes that should be protected. You, on the other hand, limit it to when a woman is raped or her life is in danger. Otherwise, its all murder. To me, its not. That's where our impasse is. That doesn't mean I don't value life btw. Just have a very different idea of when life begins and that there are circumstances where abortions should be an acceptable outcome. Not just in the case of a woman being raped or her life being at risk.

"Protecting all life" means "protecting all life". Not just the ones you pick and choose for your own convenience.

Find where I say Protect all Life with no regard to circumstances. That's what you are saying so go find it. It's a time waster because it doesn't exist. You want it to exist because as I stated you are fragile.

Your idea on when life begins is akin to those that think the earth is flat. This allows you to justify murder in your mind.

What happens when folks say life doesn't being until some point after birth? Your definition allows that to be ok as well.

Again, I really do think you are smarter than this and your ego and fragility prevents your intellect from showing.

[Crovash]

Are you talking about religion? You must be

This came to my mind as well, though in my thoughts I specified Christianity, the religion which BoP crows about all the time.

[metswon69]

Find where I say Protect all Life with no regard to circumstances. That's what you are saying so go find it. It's a time waster because it doesn't exist. You want it to exist because as I stated you are fragile.

Your idea on when life begins is akin to those that think the earth is flat. This allows you to justify murder in your mind.

What happens when folks say life doesn't being until some point after birth? Your definition allows that to be ok as well.

Again, I really do think you are smarter than this and your ego and fragility prevents your intellect from showing.

Moving goalposts I see. I mean "protect all life" sounds pretty blanketing to me. You didn't preface it with anything. No, I don't want it to exist. Its exists because you said it.

That's your opinion. Foundationally, we disagree on when life begins and when abortion is acceptable. That's why I thought the previous laws in which it was allowed or not allowed worked just fine. Obviously a cross section of judges feel otherwise. It doesn't take much. A majority of 9 justices.

Its not a matter of ego, intelligence, or fragility. Its a matter of fundamental disagreement. I can easily counter that science says a fetus can't survive outside the womb for 20 or so weeks and most abortions occur way before that point.

[catman]

Moving goalposts I see. I mean "protect all life" sounds pretty blanketing to me. You didn't preface it with anything. No, I don't want it to exist. Its exists because you said it.

That's your opinion. Foundationally, we disagree on when life begins and when abortion is acceptable. That's why I thought the previous laws in which it was allowed or not allowed worked just fine. Obviously a cross section of judges feel otherwise. It doesn't take much. A majority of 9 justices.

Its not a matter of ego, intelligence, or fragility. Its a matter of fundamental disagreement. I can easily counter that science says a fetus can't survive outside the womb for 20 or so weeks and most abortions occur way before that point.

It depends how far along the baby is as to whether or not it can survive for 20 or so weeks.
This said, I understand what you are saying and agree that the cutoff on abortions should be somewhere around 15 weeks. Prior to that, all threats to the mother's life should be determined and the baby's viability should be as well.

[metswon69]

It depends how far along the baby is as to whether or not it can survive for 20 or so weeks.
This said, I understand what you are saying and agree that the cutoff on abortions should be somewhere around 15 weeks. Prior to that, all threats to the mother's life should be determined and the baby's viability should be as well.

Yeah I know brett brought up an example of 19 weeks but that's one in literally billions of babies born. Sure, the technology around natal care is improving but most babies born that prematurely don't survive as you know. Not to mention, the ones that do are at an incredibly high risk for some kind of permanent disability.

I'm not going to try and convince someone who takes the stance that "Abortion is murder" that its indeed not murder because they're not backing off that stance regardless of the science or how situations are presented to them. Its wasting keystrokes.

[R. Johnson#3]

Best for you to sit this one out.

I’m not a Republican.

[Bird of Prey]

You understand that your ilk are going to try to ban those things too, yes? And you'll support them as they do. You've figured that out, right?

Everyone is different in their viewpoints. Yes, I know that many people are against birth control pills and other contraceptives. Thats fine. I am talking about abortion and abortion only and there are people who are okay with contraception but not aborting a baby in the womb. Totally different things both accomplishing a supposed desired end namely to prevent a baby from living. When a society is willing to take a human being out of a womb and killing it, I say that society is barbaric. And right now, some of the abortion states are saying that they would allow the killing of a BORN INFANT up to a week old if the mother doesn't want the child. This is how WRONG the abortion lobby is with their murderous opinions.