Texas' restrictive abortion law takes effect after SCOTUS deadline to stop it passes.

[natepro]

Your elitist attitude is that you are better than me so beneath you to answer my questions. That's the lefties on this board.

I love the irony of this.

you need the last word, so here you go.

You type now just to type, right?

Way to not answer the question. You are ready to be a lefty politician.

Using a crayon is the only way to reach you. But keep struggling with that.

Making up things that don't exist is your honey pot.

Who explained it to you? We all want to know.

The topic is the sitting President, not your lack of intelligence.

And on, and on, and on...

[Crovash]

And this is staying on topic???




























This was just from the last few pages of this thread.

You can barely put together a cohesive sentence let alone stay on topic. You also want to "stay on topic" but are in complete denial that the topic of texas' abortion law has massive negative consequences for citizens, are completely related to republican hypocrisy of "pro-life", etc.

Honestly, this place used to be modestly entertaining (they may have been completely off the rails, but at least the conservatives like Special, Sluggo, and Bird of Prey were amusing from time to time).

Brett has made it dreary. He’s just plain boring: his posts are repetitive and hollow (not to mention mostly wrong-headed), and his cowardly self-righteousness is so annoying, it isn’t even laughable.

That anyone engages with him is beyond me.

[natepro]

Honestly, this place used to be modestly entertaining (they may have been completely off the rails, but at least the conservatives like Special, Sluggo, and Bird of Prey were amusing from time to time).

Brett has made it dreary. He’s just plain boring: his posts are repetitive and hollow (not to mention mostly wrong-headed), and his cowardly self-righteousness is so annoying, it isn’t even laughable.

That anyone engages with him is beyond me.

Yup. The vast majority of his posts are completely indistinguishable from each other.

[brett05]

I answered your question. Its not abortion on demand when there were limitations (prior to Roe V Wade being overturned) where abortions could be performed.

no you haven't...you are so far behind

[brett05]

I'll play along since you seem to need some mental stimulation (normally I would recommend Sesame Street for someone of your developmental stage, but let's try this).

https://everytexan.org/2022/12/05/th...ortion-access/

Texas-Sized Costs

According to the Texas Policy Evaluation Project, within the four months after the Texas abortion ban was implemented in 2021, over 5,500 Texans sought out-of-state abortions compared to about 500 during the same timeframe in 2019. In light of the 2021 laws, 52 companies — including Yelp, Lyft, Ben & Jerry’s, Lush Fresh Handmade Cosmetics, and Bumble — criticized Texas’ near-total ban on abortion, stating in an open letter that restrictions on reproductive care will be “bad for business” and hurt workers, customers, and the state’s economy.

Data show that the economic impacts of abortion bans are huge. The IWPR found that the economic loss of abortion restrictions to women and the state economy is $14.5 billion annually in Texas. Studies from the IWPR also show that eliminating abortion bans and restrictions would be beneficial not only to women and birthing people but also to the state economy overall. Eliminating all state-level abortion restrictions would result in over 82,000 women ages 15-44 entering the workforce.

In addition, state earnings would increase as a result of a larger labor force in the absence of abortion restrictions. Hispanic/Latina women would see the highest increase in state earnings — over $190 million annually. For all employed women ages 15-44, estimated earnings would increase by over $14 billion (in 2020 dollars) per year.

The economic impacts of abortion restrictions are substantiated by multiple studies and years of research. The outcomes observed by some of these studies, including reduced female labor force participation, directly impact the overall economic standing of individual states, and the country at large.

This describes the negative economic impact of abortion restrictions in texas.

Deflection in 3....2...1.....

Let's start at the beginning.

According to the Texas Policy Evaluation Project, within the four months after the Texas abortion ban was implemented in 2021, over 5,500 Texans sought out-of-state abortions compared to about 500 during the same timeframe in 2019.

And how many abortions were done in Texas during those two periods?

[nyyfan555]

Let's start at the beginning.


And how many abortions were done in Texas during those two periods?

Stick to the topic: the economic costs of the texas abortion ban.

[brett05]

Stick to the topic: the economic costs of the texas abortion ban.

I am sticking.
Look it took you one single reply post to force the conversation elsewhere. Deflect, Duck, Dodge. Congrats.
Shame on me that you might take it seriously. That's on me. My bad. I am sorry.

[mngopher35]

I am sticking.
Look it took you one single reply post to force the conversation elsewhere. Deflect, Duck, Dodge. Congrats.
Shame on me that you might take it seriously. That's on me. My bad. I am sorry.

Yet another post where Brett pretends to describe others he dislikes but the reality is it fits his own approach perfectly.

[nyyfan555]

I am sticking.
Look it took you one single reply post to force the conversation elsewhere. Deflect, Duck, Dodge. Congrats.
Shame on me that you might take it seriously. That's on me. My bad. I am sorry.

You asked how many abortions were performed during a time period. That was not a question or comment about the economic losses from the texas abortion ban.

I accept your apology. Now try again little guy.

[metswon69]

no you haven't...you are so far behind

Yes I have. There was clearly a line of demarcation in which abortion was illegal in various states. How is it abortion on demand when you couldn't get late stage abortions because it was criminal?

Secondly, don't talk about people being so far behind when you refuse to acknowledge all the reasons why people get abortions. Its pathetic and makes your "respect for life" position a complete joke, especially when you factor in all the other stances you take in respect to the death penalty, guns, climate change, etc.

[brett05]

Yes I have. There was clearly a line of demarcation in which abortion was illegal in various states. How is it abortion on demand when you couldn't get late stage abortions because it was criminal?

Secondly, don't talk about people being so far behind when you refuse to acknowledge all the reasons why people get abortions. Its pathetic and makes your "respect for life" position a complete joke, especially when you factor in all the other stances you take in respect to the death penalty, guns, climate change, etc.

You are so far behind in answering questions. SMH

[spliff(TONE)]

Yet another post where Brett pretends to describe others he dislikes but the reality is it fits his own approach perfectly.

Most of our real All-Star posters like brett05 seem to share this one trait: zero self awareness.

[Zmaster52]

https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCring...tm_name=iossmf

Great stuff.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[nyyfan555]

https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCring...tm_name=iossmf

Great stuff.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This **** is so disgusting. These people need to be launched out of a cannon to a deserted island.

[dbroncos78087]

https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCring...tm_name=iossmf

Great stuff.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This isn’t surprising sadly. These are also the same folks who say that we should cut foreign aid because we have poor people here but then call aid to citizens socialism.