Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 5 of 99 FirstFirst ... 345671555 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 1471
  1. #61
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    19,180
    Quote Originally Posted by Garrett2010 View Post
    I still think Ball would have cost a kings ransom based on his hype and draft position.

    I am very bullish on Mitchell and his price should be far cheaper since he is projected around 10.
    Just messing with you based on our debates around this last year…but it does go to show you can’t count on the next draft being a better opportunity. Seize the moment when it’s available. So much changes in a year.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    16,109
    Quote Originally Posted by smood999 View Post
    Just messing with you based on our debates around this last year…but it does go to show you can’t count on the next draft being a better opportunity. Seize the moment when it’s available. So much changes in a year.
    LaMelo was the move. Was so much “smoke” about teams willing to trade down. Not hearing barely anything about that this year

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    13,622
    Quote Originally Posted by smood999 View Post
    Just messing with you based on our debates around this last year…but it does go to show you can’t count on the next draft being a better opportunity. Seize the moment when it’s available. So much changes in a year.
    Well one thing we never saw coming was that the Knicks would be very good this year. Total shock we are drafting this low.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    52,844
    Quote Originally Posted by Gideon View Post
    I would be very happy with that draft oballers. I would love to draft Moody and Bassey. Cameron Thomas would be a nice scoring guard coming off the bench.
    actually who wouldn't and it's nearly impossible so yea I'm not sure there is one fan who wouldn't drool over this, but again you know what it would take, and we don't have it.

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    13,622
    Quote Originally Posted by ShadyOne View Post
    LaMelo was the move. Was so much “smoke” about teams willing to trade down. Not hearing barely anything about that this year
    Cha apparently wants to move down.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    16,109
    Quote Originally Posted by Garrett2010 View Post
    Cha apparently wants to move down.
    Meant higher up. But yeah, that’s the only one I’ve heard

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    9,279
    I'm hearing Knox and #32 pick to Orlando for Terrance Ross. Id rather do that than trade #19 and #21 to move up. Ross is starting next to RJ on the wing.

    #19 Jackson from Kentucky
    #21 Tre Mann or Butler
    #58 Garza

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Staten island Ny
    Posts
    35,325
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Detfink View Post
    Well, the Grizz drafted Desmond Bane & traded picks for Spencer Tillman Jr...two nice pieces that compliment Dillon Brooks, Jaren Jackson Jr....and now, the #10 pick. Not bad.



    A lot of people are looking dumb including myself. The Bucks proved that you don't need a super team to win a Championship.

    I see the Memphis Grizzlies building like the Bucks, modestly with some interesting pieces and maybe 1-2 bigger pieces to take off.
    “Don’t need a super team” took the nets getting hurt Lakers getting hurt, clippers getting hurt. They don’t win if everyone’s healthy and let’s relax they have a stacked team. You have a top 2-4 player in the game with another 2 top 15-20 players. Memphis is nowhere close
    Spurs Sim league
    2 time Champion 653-331

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Staten island Ny
    Posts
    35,325
    Quote Originally Posted by smood999 View Post
    Should’ve used them to try for LaMelo lol

    Even if they are successful in getting Mitchell, he doesn’t compare.
    I like Mitchell a lot but agree
    Spurs Sim league
    2 time Champion 653-331

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    12,115
    If TRoss is starting on the Knicks next yr when we have the most cap space flexibility, draft picks, and the most influential mgt team in our history, I would be utterly shocked and disappointed.

  11. #71
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    16,109
    Quote Originally Posted by Bivory View Post
    If TRoss is starting on the Knicks next yr when we have the most cap space flexibility, draft picks, and the most influential mgt team in our history, I would be utterly shocked and disappointed.
    What do you expect? What would be good?

  12. #72
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    52,844
    Back in 2005 we had the 8th, 21st in a trade for Kurt Thomas and the 30th

    Just some memories lol:



  13. #73
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    8,335
    Quote Originally Posted by still a fan View Post
    actually who wouldn't and it's nearly impossible so yea I'm not sure there is one fan who wouldn't drool over this, but again you know what it would take, and we don't have it.
    Oh I know it ain’t happening. He just asked me to look at his mock.

  14. #74
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    25,720
    Quote Originally Posted by smood999 View Post
    Should’ve used them to try for LaMelo lol

    Even if they are successful in getting Mitchell, he doesn’t compare.
    Now you see how I felt when this board kept saying those picks will land us top tier player instead of trading it for lamelo.

    Sent from my HD1905 using Tapatalk

  15. #75
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    19,180
    Quote Originally Posted by Bivory View Post
    If TRoss is starting on the Knicks next yr when we have the most cap space flexibility, draft picks, and the most influential mgt team in our history, I would be utterly shocked and disappointed.
    They aren’t going to spend just to spend. This isn’t a great free agency class.

Page 5 of 99 FirstFirst ... 345671555 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •