Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 60 of 168 FirstFirst ... 1050585960616270110160 ... LastLast
Results 886 to 900 of 2506
  1. #886
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    4,471
    Quote Originally Posted by dbroncos78087 View Post
    I think that some federal funding should be contingent on getting vaccine rates up. If they donít get above 60 or 70% (or higher), you get less funds.
    Wasn't this tactic tried with the previous administration and the SC ruled it's can't be done?
    My Ignore List: bklynny67, nastynice, OhSoSlick, spliff(TONE), zmaster52

  2. #887
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    5,120
    What if we trample on the 1st amendment, will that get it up?

  3. #888
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    South Dakota
    Posts
    17,580
    Quote Originally Posted by dbroncos78087 View Post
    I think that some federal funding should be contingent on getting vaccine rates up. If they donít get above 60 or 70% (or higher), you get less funds.
    so your take is to punish the vaxed for the decisions of the unvaxed...because having those unvaxed out there isn't enough punishment
    gotta love 'referential' treatment

  4. #889
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    parts unknown
    Posts
    60,970
    Quote Originally Posted by ciaban2.0 View Post
    What if we trample on the 1st amendment, will that get it up?
    I think it comes down to who wants it more


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Rep Power: 0




    Quote Originally Posted by Raps08-09 Champ View Post
    My dick is named 'Ewing'.

  5. #890
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    America
    Posts
    100,630
    Quote Originally Posted by brett05 View Post
    Wasn't this tactic tried with the previous administration and the SC ruled it's can't be done?
    It can be done if the policy aim relates to the funding. So you can make a connection between medical policy and vaccination. But it canít be related to something entirely unconnected. But it is also strengthened if done through the legislative procedure rather than by administration. There is a budget reconciliation coming and it could be put into that.

  6. #891
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    3,037
    Quote Originally Posted by ciaban2.0 View Post
    What if we trample on the 1st amendment, will that get it up?
    In what way? Anti-vaxxers have the right to continue to be ****ing ******** and say stupid stuff. I dont get the reference.
    Last edited by zookman65; 07-16-2021 at 10:10 PM.

  7. #892
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    America
    Posts
    100,630
    This is the kind of content we need all over the place. This should be posted in every city in the south.


  8. #893
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    42,332
    Quote Originally Posted by dbroncos78087 View Post
    This is the kind of content we need all over the place. This should be posted in every city in the south.

    Still pathetic he did it in silence, especially when he was constantly preaching how amazing the vaccine would be and how great of a job he did with Operation Warp Speed.

  9. #894
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    America
    Posts
    100,630
    Quote Originally Posted by metswon69 View Post
    Still pathetic he did it in silence, especially when he was constantly preaching how amazing the vaccine would be and how great of a job he did with Operation Warp Speed.
    I know it was never going to happen. But if they had both gotten their second doses on inauguration day and pointed out how the vaccine wasn't partisan, it would have been wonderfully helpful.
    Let's get embedded tweets working again!

    https://forums.prosportsdaily.com/sh...5#post33780085

  10. #895
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    59,721
    rEnT fReE

  11. #896
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Central Iowa
    Posts
    6,653
    Pfizer's vaccine is likely to get full approval from the FDA in January. This would make it possible for mandatory vaccinations as condition of hire or continued employment for many workers.

  12. #897
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    40,315
    Quote Originally Posted by catman View Post
    Pfizer's vaccine is likely to get full approval from the FDA in January. This would make it possible for mandatory vaccinations as condition of hire or continued employment for many workers.
    That's already possible.

    K.1. Under the ADA, Title VII, and other federal employment nondiscrimination laws, may an employer require all employees physically entering the workplace to be vaccinated for COVID-19? (5/28/21)

    The federal EEO laws do not prevent an employer from requiring all employees physically entering the workplace to be vaccinated for COVID-19, subject to the reasonable accommodation provisions of Title VII and the ADA and other EEO considerations discussed below. These principles apply if an employee gets the vaccine in the community or from the employer.

    https://www.eeoc.gov/wysk/what-you-s...other-eeo-laws


    "The thing we may have to accept is that red states really like this pandemic and want to keep it.Ē" - @LOLGOP

  13. #898
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    5,136
    Quote Originally Posted by catman View Post
    Pfizer's vaccine is likely to get full approval from the FDA in January. This would make it possible for mandatory vaccinations as condition of hire or continued employment for many workers.
    That's way too late. FDA should push that up.
    "The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality.Ē

    -JFK


  14. #899
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    7,725
    Quote Originally Posted by catman View Post
    Pfizer's vaccine is likely to get full approval from the FDA in January. This would make it possible for mandatory vaccinations as condition of hire or continued employment for many workers.
    Employers are having a hard time finding workers the way it is. That would be a beyond stupid thing to do


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  15. #900
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Central Iowa
    Posts
    6,653
    Lots of people would rather sit at home, getting the additional $300/week in unemployment benefits that the government is giving them than actually do some real work. Many states have discontinued this in order to get people to go back to work. Also, when you have people in government telling people that it is not "safe" to go back to work right now, it won't help.
    Nearly every business in my area is looking to hire people and is having trouble finding qualified people to do the jobs or even people willing to learn on the job and get the skills to earn a good income in the future.
    Last edited by catman; 07-17-2021 at 11:31 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •