Sponsored Links |
|
Hypithetically... Would you rather take
A) the best QB left in the first
B) Trade back... Gain assets and draft every QB after that with those picks
MOND.....MILLS... AND NEWMAN
I kinda like the idea of shooting multiple shots myself.
"If your going to be thinking anyway, you might as well think big"
-Rem Koolhaas
Luck was overrated and certainly a tier below Wilson. Not even debatable.
Sponsored Links |
|
funny to hear Bears fans call Andrew Luck "over rated" LOL
guy passed for 275 YPG. Was working with almost nothing other than TY Hilton. Had no run game or defense to play with durring his time.... and was 55 and 33 with 3 11 win seasons in his first 3 years.
Wilson was never looked as as "THE GUY" of the offense till last year (in which there is some debate if he can in the seahawks organization lead an offense) Do you think Luck ever had questions behind if he could lead a passing offense... of course not.
Im not going to sit here and say Luck is Better. But to Argue Wilson is extremely more talented or a much better player overall just seems foolish. Especially considering the QB Hellhole that is the Chicago Bears.
"If your going to be thinking anyway, you might as well think big"
-Rem Koolhaas
Why can't a Bears fan have the opinion that a QB is overrated, or prefer Russell Wilson? I personally disagree with the sentiment, and would actually agree that it's pretty close, but it's not like anyone is saying Luck is a scrub and that they wouldn't take him on the Bears in a heartbeat.
In terms of talent and tangibles it's debatable; Even with his injuries, Luck was still a top 5 QB at his time.
But from a draft value standpoint?
Russ>>>>>Luck. SEA had the steal of the entire draft and this was after they sent a ton of money to Matt Flynn to be their QB savior, lol.
Seattle didn't know what they had until they forced to look at their options after the Mat Flynn experience failed. This is why you draft QBs often.
I mean he has a point, we would have some nerve calling a QB like Luck overrated. Luck took his team to the playoffs in 4 out of 6 years, and 1 of the 2 he didn't, he got hurt. And before you say something like "he had a good defense", the Bears have had good defenses for 75% of our miserable fanhood, and that rarely equated to the playoffs.
If you think Luck was overrated, then you have to be consistent and say Favre is overrated too, since they were actually pretty similar. Just under the elite completion percentages, high INT rates. They were both winners though. They took risks which was boom or bust with TO's at times, but it got consistent results.
Spoiler Alert: Neither were overrated and we would be lucky to have anything close to them.
Sponsored Links |
|