
Originally Posted by
AUDIT
You could also go with Lindor batting #3 because of his speed.
In any case, I prefer the combo of Nimmo and McNeil, both on base junkies. As they have done in the past, Alonso has batted up in the order, mostly #2. I could see him at #3 or even maybe later down in the order depending on what he does coming out of the gate.
The curious case of Pillar/Almora. Seems like Mets are betting on the DH. But I would not be surprised if it turns out, as it does appear now, that there is no DH, for the Mets to trade Dom. Naturally, they have to get a good return for him. But it does appear the Mets have set themselves up to have Pillar in CF. If that comes to pass, whatever way it works out, you might have 3 RH hitters back to back in JD, McAnn, Pillar.
I've always felt that with a decent hitting catcher, because they get limited ABs batting down in the order and playing less games, that occasionally at least, I would take a shot at having McCann bat up in the order, at least now and then. Of course, that goes against convention. Ultimately, however, batting order doesn't make that much of a difference in results, with one exception.....the one exception being that you should bat first (top of the order) the hitters that have the better on base percentage. In this case Nimmo and McNeil.
So, following that principle, Lindor has NOT shown a propensity to get on base as much as others, i.e., on base percentage, while Conforto has (as well as Nimmo-McNeil). Possibly Alonso as well if pitchers start walking him a lot But, good thing (maybe) is that he strikes out a lot which means less hitting into DPs batting behind Nimmo-McNeil.
Bottom line, other than Nimmo-McNeil, you could go so many ways with the batting order and in the end it probably does not have a significant effect.