Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 17 of 43 FirstFirst ... 7151617181927 ... LastLast
Results 241 to 255 of 638
  1. #241
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    22,989
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.B View Post
    Reading this makes me think the Cowboys will be drafting Pitts if hes there at 10. I would hate that move personally.
    But didn't you defend the Lamb pick because he was BPA? (I agree btw.) Pitts at 10 probably would be BPA. I'm not as high on Jarwin/Schultz like some other Cowboys fans either.

  2. #242
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    13,847
    Quote Originally Posted by QB_Eagles View Post
    But didn't you defend the Lamb pick because he was BPA? (I agree btw.) Pitts at 10 probably would be BPA. I'm not as high on Jarwin/Schultz like some other Cowboys fans either.
    I dont believe he would be best player available at 10. Rashawn Slater would be a better player if hes available at 10. Farley and Surtain would also be BPA at 10.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  3. #243
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Posts
    8,454
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.B View Post
    I dont believe he would be best player available at 10. Rashawn Slater would be a better player if hes available at 10. Farley and Surtain would also be BPA at 10.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Supposedly he did pretty good against chase young in college

  4. #244
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    15,449
    Quote Originally Posted by Kobe1016 View Post
    Pitts will not be there at 15. Patriots will have to trade up. I don't see that from BB.
    He might. With 5 QBs possibly going top 15 lots of good players are gonna slide.

  5. #245
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    13,847
    Quote Originally Posted by QQQ View Post
    Supposedly he did pretty good against chase young in college
    Id rather get a guy that can block Chase Young in the NFL than a guy that will be out running routes.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  6. #246
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    13,847
    Trey Lance had a good pro day.

    https://twitter.com/brgridiron/statu...890950656?s=21


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  7. #247
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    13,847

  8. #248
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    5,733
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.B View Post
    I dont believe he would be best player available at 10. Rashawn Slater would be a better player if hes available at 10. Farley and Surtain would also be BPA at 10.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Not sure about Slater, but I sincerely doubt there are that many people that would argue Farley or Surtain would be BPA over Pitts.

  9. #249
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Posts
    8,454
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.B View Post
    Id rather get a guy that can block Chase Young in the NFL than a guy that will be out running routes.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Me too

  10. #250
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    13,847
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrei00 View Post
    Not sure about Slater, but I sincerely doubt there are that many people that would argue Farley or Surtain would be BPA over Pitts.
    You doubt it but its a fact. Many would put both over Pitts. Not to mention most would consider starting CB a much more valuable position than TE. Farley is probably also a better overall athlete than Pitts.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  11. #251
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    5,733
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.B View Post
    You doubt it but its a fact. Many would put both over Pitts. Not to mention most would consider starting CB a much more valuable position than TE. Farley is probably also a better overall athlete than Pitts.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    PFF has Pitts ranked higher than all three you mentioned. Miller has Pitts higher. Kiper has Pitts higher. McShay has Pitts higher. Literally, you're the first person I've so far seen ranking Pitts lower than Farley or Surtain. So not so sure I'll trust you on that being a 'fact'.

  12. #252
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    13,847
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrei00 View Post
    PFF has Pitts ranked higher than all three you mentioned. Miller has Pitts higher. Kiper has Pitts higher. McShay has Pitts higher. Literally, you're the first person I've so far seen ranking Pitts lower than Farley or Surtain. So not so sure I'll trust you on that being a 'fact'.
    Youre probably right. I mean there is a long history of HOF TEs being drafted in the top 10 and teams building their entire offense around a TE.

    And in a passing league who needs CBs that play strong man to man and run 4.2? Those guys grow on trees.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  13. #253
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    35,674
    Let's chill with the HOF mention for Pitts. He's great but that's a leap to even hypothetically speak on for any rookie.

    And once again I don't see what the history of the TE position has to do with Pitts. Why do I care what OJ Howard did? Sure Gronk and Kelce went in the second - if there were redrafts they'd go top 5. Pitts should be evaluated on his own merits, not anyone else's.


    NE Patriots Forum HOF (Class of 2011)

  14. #254
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    5,733
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.B View Post
    Youre probably right. I mean there is a long history of HOF TEs being drafted in the top 10 and teams building their entire offense around a TE.

    And in a passing league who needs CBs that play strong man to man and run 4.2? Those guys grow on trees.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Is this supposed to somehow relate to Pitts being a better prospect than Farley or Surtain?

  15. #255
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    35,674
    Matt Light was a terrific player for the Pats. Loooooong time starting LT. Assante Samuel was a terrific CB. Gronk had a better career than both of then. If given the choice to draft one of them, I'm taking Gronk 10 times out of 10.

    You have to honestly evaluate the prospects. If you think Pitts is a truly elite and transcendent talent like pretty much everyone does, then that has to elevate him on your board even if others player more premium positions. Positional value does matter, but a special talent at TE is worth more than a really good LT or CB still.


    NE Patriots Forum HOF (Class of 2011)

Page 17 of 43 FirstFirst ... 7151617181927 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •