
Originally Posted by
Chronz
The problem arises when you acquire several of those kind of players, who becomes the SG or do we simply say the Clippers play no SG? Cuz if thats the case then we got alot of players to reclassify historically.
Watch literally any Clippers game with he and Kawhi. Which of the 2 would you say is more likely to slide to the 4 when they go small and which of the two would slide up to the 2 when they play alongside a more true 4(a less dissimilar situation here) like Morris and Batum. PG is our most perimeter oriented swingman of the bunch, who exactly do you guys think plays SG for the Clippers? And if you want to get really technical with the X's and O's, PG has been more of a PG than someone like Beverly who plays off the ball, but that up to how you guys define positions. All I know is Kawhi and PG play the same position but by literal definitions, one of them has to be the 2, thus, in a separate category for award purposes. Voters do this all the time.
Thats your opinion, its not really as cut and dry as you think it is, stats dont work that way and I am trying to explain how assessing the data actually works. You're citing stat but you dont actually know how its coming to the conclusion and any inherent flaws with the methodology. By that same measure, Kawhi is our starting SG, yet hes listed in the same category as PG, thats been one of my points here. Have you seen the tape or just blindly accepting theories? What position do you think Magic played throughout his career? Check the stats lol
Why would I cry? LOL, at least you have an argument about it maybe benefitting him but I think that depends on the competition in his field. Im thinking the coaches and players will give him more respect as a 2 in this years Western field but I could be wrong. Still, no doubt the stats dont back you.
Its positionless basketball but the nomination for awards arent, hence the point. SOMEONE has to play SG and by the same measures you're misusing, its either Kawhi or PG, so yeah, it kind of matters who you think plays SG for a team it seems you dont really watch play much.
If you think slow *** Batum is more fitting of that qualification this late in his career and being a tertiary playmaker as opposed to one of our primary playmakers then I cant help you understand statistics. Justin isn't here to defend how you are misusing his work (assuming BBR still bases much of their forumulas off his work) but I used to frequent the APBR boards back in the early days of all these stats, suffice it to say, they would be the first to correct you on these position estimates. I've seen them admit as much before, its either Kawhi or PG, either way they are categorically opposed. Its like when award voters put players in different positions to field the best possible team. Thats what I want but I'll admit I havent really dug deep enough to see if that would be the case here. Only talking numbers