The race for voter suppression starts anew!

[catman]

And, by the way, the only way this line of discussion fits with voter suppression is if you shoot and kill a registered voter. You have suppressed their vote by doing so.

[valade16]

I am not trying to defend anyone, I am simply pointing out that it is technically possible for one bullet to kill 4 people. You have admitted as much and I agree that is is highly unlikely. So, why the arguments?

Because Brett says we should measure the frequency of mass shootings as a % of the total number of bullets because they each have the potential for a mass shooting. Do you agree?

[spliff(TONE)]

You are the one that said it is impossible. I am saying that it is possible, although unlikely. A 30/30 or a 30.06 could be able to do so.
Again, you are taking a hypothetical as an absolute.

So....no evidence?

[spliff(TONE)]

You are not accepting the fact that it is, indeed, a possibility. That is my point here. You are taking a hypothetical situation (a single bullet killing 4 people) and saying that it cannot happen. It can.

You should prove it instead of blindly defending your dimwit buddy.

[catman]

Because Brett says we should measure the frequency of mass shootings as a % of the total number of bullets because they each have the potential for a mass shooting. Do you agree?

No, I do not.

[dbroncos78087]

And, by the way, the only way this line of discussion fits with voter suppression is if you shoot and kill a registered voter. You have suppressed their vote by doing so.

By this logic, was the state’s action to kill Breonna Taylor and Amir Locke voter suppression?

[catman]

Really? Is this the best you can do?
Quite lame.

[valade16]

Really? Is this the best you can do?
Quite lame.

It’s a valid question based on your logic. If shooting someone dead is taking away their voting rights, then the state shooting someone dead also takes away their voting rights.

[brett05]

No, your contention was we should measure the frequency of mass shootings as a % of ALL bullets because ALL bullets could possibly by themselves execute a mass shooting.

That is not true. Many calibers (9mm, .22, .556) cannot.

Even if we wanted to use your absurd logic, it should only be restricted to a % of bullets even capable of a mass shooting.


That you think all bullets are the same shows how little you know of the subject. Something tells me it will take forever before you admit your point was dumb.

you are saying that a shot from a 9/22/556 could not kill multiple people? Remember I only need one possibility.

[brett05]

And I bet his reply was a reply to you. You’re the only one initiating net new discussion about non-voting topics.

In order to get this back on track, do you have any new evidence of voter fraud?

I answered this already, we have enough to data to increase voter protection.

[dbroncos78087]

I answered this already, we have enough to data to increase voter protection.

You have NEVER answered this. We have a low two digits fraud number. That is the problem you face in proving any further need for changes.

[valade16]

you are saying that a shot from a 9/22/556 could not kill multiple people? Remember I only need one possibility.

The definition of a mass shooting is when it kills 4 or more people. No, those calibers cannot. If it were two people it’d be different, but if it were two people dead the number of mass shootings would be far higher as well.

[catman]

It’s a valid question based on your logic. If shooting someone dead is taking away their voting rights, then the state shooting someone dead also takes away their voting rights.

Sorry, but you are trying entirely too hard to make a point that you are not making one at all.
Did the state kill Breonna Taylor and Amir Locke? I don't believe they did.
As I said, this is quite lame. I expect a lot better from you.

[Kenny Powders]

Sorry, but you are trying entirely too hard to make a point that you are not making one at all.
Did the state kill Breonna Taylor and Amir Locke? I don't believe they did.
As I said, this is quite lame. I expect a lot better from you.

Did a representative of the state kill them?

Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk

[brett05]

The definition of a mass shooting is when it kills 4 or more people. No, those calibers cannot. If it were two people it’d be different, but if it were two people dead the number of mass shootings would be far higher as well.

sure could. How about a woman pregnant with triplets? No need to answer, we all know the right answer and the answer you'll give.