Sponsored Links |
|
Michael Phelps stuck out to me the most. He won 23 gold medals (28 total) across 4 Olympics, and 29 gold medals (33 total) across 6 world championships. I doubt there will ever be a swimmer as dominating as he was.
Now imagine if Mahomes wins the Super Bowl, that'd be 2 in his 3 years as a starter, and as of now it looks like he'll be in a tier of his own for a while. Josh Allen may be close but he doesn't have Andy Reid as HC.
For my money give me Tiger Woods.
In his career:
T-1 in most PGA tour wins at 82, reaching that number 9 years before Sam Snead.
Staggering 110 wins worldwide as a professional.
Has won in 22.8% of his career starts, finished top 10 in 55.2% of his starts.
Has won 96% of the time when he has a lead going into the final round.
By 2014 Tiger had only missed the cut 11 times in 302 starts.
PGA Tour record 142 straight cuts made (next closest are Byron Nelson with 113, Jack Nicklaus 105).
In his prime (97-09) he won 33% of tournaments and majors he played in.
99-02 Tiger won 7 of 11 majors played.
683 weeks as the OWGR's #1 player, 6 years longer than the next longest.
16-1 in career playoffs for PGA and European Tour events.
My favorite two stats:
2. In a stretch from the middle of the 1999 season through the middle of the 2001 season, Woods won 20 of the 38 stroke-play events he played on the Tour (a .526 win percentage). In those events, Woods was a combined 472 under, a cumulative score 307 shots better than anyone else. Vijay Singh was second.
1. From 1997 through 2008, Woods was a combined 126 under par in majors. There are 138 other players who played at least 40 rounds in major championships in that span. Among that group, Woods was a staggering 189 shots better than anyone else. Second on the list: Joe Ogilvie, at 63 over.
Sponsored Links |
|
Dak: 17,634 @ 66.0%, 7.7 per att, 106+24 TD, 40 INT+34 FMB, 97.3 Rate
Wentz: 16,811 @ 62.7%, 6.7 per att, 113+8 TD, 50 INT+58 FMB, 89.2 Rate
"Hater" is a term used by weak minded people in the face of legitimate criticism.
-Scott van Pelt
Reid's better than McDermott, but not by enough to matter.
Chiefs D won the game. It sucks because Leslie Frazier did some good things with the Bills D this year, but also some bad things. It doesn't feel like he should be replaced for this, but the D needs to improve next year. Run D was bad except in the playoffs, D against TE was worst in the league, secondary was solid except the few games where White wasn't enough to be a shutdown corner.
Feels like the Bills D talent carried the D versus the scheme, I guess.
Dak: 17,634 @ 66.0%, 7.7 per att, 106+24 TD, 40 INT+34 FMB, 97.3 Rate
Wentz: 16,811 @ 62.7%, 6.7 per att, 113+8 TD, 50 INT+58 FMB, 89.2 Rate
"Hater" is a term used by weak minded people in the face of legitimate criticism.
-Scott van Pelt
Dak: 17,634 @ 66.0%, 7.7 per att, 106+24 TD, 40 INT+34 FMB, 97.3 Rate
Wentz: 16,811 @ 62.7%, 6.7 per att, 113+8 TD, 50 INT+58 FMB, 89.2 Rate
"Hater" is a term used by weak minded people in the face of legitimate criticism.
-Scott van Pelt
Sponsored Links |
|