Sponsored Links |
|
Mae broke the signing of Brantley, others started reporting it after her tweet. Timeline is below, all attributed to Mae as being the first to report it
https://awfulannouncing.com/mlb/haze...y-toronto.html
There's a massive difference between crediting someone first and crediting then as the source.
Ie look at Rosenthal (one of the best at this).
https://mobile.twitter.com/Ken_Rosen...36891294281729
Yea he's saying his sources are also giving him the same details that hes going to the blue jays.
So Hazel broke it first but clearly whoever gave wrong info to Hazel also gave wrong info to other people. Otherwise its coming off like the other guys are just using Hazel's tweet as to how they found out, which wasnt actually the case.
Sponsored Links |
|
Source confirms: Free-agent Michael Brantley in agreement with Blue Jays on a three-year contract, pending physical. First:
@thehazelmae
.
I say what you mean now but I don't think that's how most people viewed it though. Also, his tweet could be taken as Mae is the source and Mae being first.
Doubt Hazel is Rosenthal's source. They probably have the same person within the Jays org tipping them.
Yeah, Hazel isn't a source
Mae tweeted it first in terms of the when. Rosenthal came after, also gave her credit after her tweet. Not sure why it's even up for debate. Mae put it on "paper" first, let her own it and be done with it. She isn't a credible source, neither was the person that told her, she's a reporter.
Yea she isnt a credible source for breaking news but others got the same news from their our sources. Which makes it come off like others had the same source within the Jays org as she did.
She did report Sanchez to Boras thoigh.
Sponsored Links |
|