Sponsored Links |
|
I hope Trey Lance falls to 20.....Otherwise I'd trade for Watson........But he will be more costly then Mack! The fact that both Pace and Nagy are on their last contract year tells me he will go the trade route.......For what it's worth I blame Pace a lot more then Nagy for this mess!!
I really do not want Ryan, Carr ,Prescott, Stafford and some other's mentioned earlier except Watson. But again he will cost a ton!
I think the OL will be addressed and be a real point of emphasis. I think Whitehair, Daniels, and to a lesser extent, Leno are locks. Bears could then draft an OT in the 1st to replace Massie, and then bring in another rookie mid round C to compete with Mustipher. Leno/Cody/Mustipher or rookie/Daniels/1st round pick
That line is more than functional
Also lol at "surely better than Foles" is the understatement of the year. Ryan is a top 10ish QB. Foles is a backup.
I also think this notion that less mobile QBs can't get by with poor offensive line play is wrong. Not being very mobile are about the only ways that Foles and Ryan can be compared. As passers, and in the pocket, Ryan is obviously superior. He's been around 10+ years and even his performance last year would likely be the best from a Bears' QB ever (not that that's the measuring stick, of course, but you get the point). Also, FWIW, Profootballfocus and Football Outsiders both favor the Bears' line to Atlanta's this year, particularly in pass blocking metrics.
And agreed on adding a center. They come cheaper than most pieces on the line and there's plenty of them available. Would love to snag Linsley from GB.
Last edited by La_bibbers; 01-13-2021 at 07:00 PM.
https://twitter.com/670thescore/stat...741442049?s=21
I do like Kris Richard
Sponsored Links |
|
What world is this?
Prescott costing just a 1st and 2nd? Nope.
Watson 2 first plus++ is realistic.
Stafford a 1st+ is realistic on a trade in division but not guna happen.
Carr for a 2nd? Don't get why people think he's available, or for that price. The Raiders are just guna trade a solid starter for a 2nd and enter a period of no QB? What's this logic?
Matt Ryan. There's no signal he's available. Just a 2nd? There'd be 15 teams lined up for that which is why that value is way too low.
Alex Smith? A 3rd? He's going to get released, no teams paying that.
Jimmy G. 4th to free? What world are we in? Maybe they cut him in some weird world. They've won at something like 80% when he starts and they have no one to replace him.
Wentz for a 5th? Wtf. We just paid a 4th for Nick Foles. Not reality.
For Anyone that missed today's press conference; here's a quick recap:
https://kapwi.ng/c/FxwLYSrn
For me it's Ryan 1A, and Carr 1B.
Obviously, I'd love Watson but I don't think the Texas are going to trade him and if they do...I don't see how they trade a 25 year old QB on a HoF trajectory for anything less than 3 1st rounders, and likely even more. Those guys simply do not become available that early on in their career. You could legitimately say, Watson hasn't hit his peak yet. To put it simply, I just don't see him being traded.
Ryan could fit because he wouldn't cost as much as some other guys. Especially say, trading multiple 1sts to trade up in the draft to select a QB scouted by Pace and developed by Nagy? Yeah, no thanks.
Matt Ryan at the very least, should get the offense to a top 15ish level. With Goldman coming back, a new DC, and likely a couple of new additions as well, that's a team that could compete.
Draft a developmental guy this season in maybe the 3rd or 5th round. Then re-evaluate the position after the season.
Carr would basically do the same thing as Ryan, and has the same pros. Just....to a lesser degree than Ryan.
Sponsored Links |
|