Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 632 of 632 FirstFirst ... 132532582622630631632
Results 9,466 to 9,476 of 9476
  1. #9466
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    8,666
    Quote Originally Posted by valade16 View Post
    It was completely different but you can’t tell me how?

    “If you can’t explain something simply, you don’t understand it” - Albert Einstein.

    It’s a very simple question, which meaning did you intend? You’re not educated enough to comprehend and say one of the meanings of the word assume? I am more educated than you one the subject it seems.
    If you can't see the differences, sorry, that's on you.
    If you look at the context it's quite obvious.
    My Ignore List: bklynny67, crovash, nastynice, natepro, OhSoSlick, spliff(TONE), zmaster52

  2. #9467
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    49,184
    Quote Originally Posted by brett05 View Post
    If you can't see the differences, sorry, that's on you.
    If you look at the context it's quite obvious.
    “I assume you meant Trump”
    “I assume you ignored Sluggo”

    What context makes those meanings completely different? Can you actually answer the question?

  3. #9468
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    68,060
    Quote Originally Posted by natepro View Post
    Guy can't explain what he meant when repeatedly using a simple word?
    Guy probably needs to watch an instructional YouTube video each morning to tie his damn shoes.

  4. #9469
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    8,666
    Quote Originally Posted by valade16 View Post
    “I assume you meant Trump”
    “I assume you ignored Sluggo”

    What context makes those meanings completely different? Can you actually answer the question?
    What's the context of those statements please?
    My Ignore List: bklynny67, crovash, nastynice, natepro, OhSoSlick, spliff(TONE), zmaster52

  5. #9470
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    49,184
    Quote Originally Posted by brett05 View Post
    What's the context of those statements please?
    You were saying you assumed the person you responded to was ignoring Sluggo’s post because you believed it demonstrated the post was already refuted.

    I was saying I assumed you were speaking about Trump because what you said also described him.

    Contextually, the only definition of “assume” in those statements is the same. No other definition of the word works in those contexts. You said there are multiple definitions of assume.

    So which definition of the word did you intend with that post if not “suppose to be the case”?

  6. #9471
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    8,666
    Quote Originally Posted by valade16 View Post
    You were saying you assumed the person you responded to was ignoring Sluggo’s post because you believed it demonstrated the post was already refuted.

    I was saying I assumed you were speaking about Trump because what you said also described him.

    Contextually, the only definition of “assume” in those statements is the same. No other definition of the word works in those contexts. You said there are multiple definitions of assume.

    So which definition of the word did you intend with that post if not “suppose to be the case”?
    The context starts with underage drinking and the lack of checking ID means there isn't any underage drinking soon followed by Sluggo's example of voter fraud in a home, specifically his (could be hypothetical could be legit), the point is that when I used I assume it was within the context of sluggo's posts and dbroncos78087 replies indicating strongly he can't read or ignored his posts. It could be the first and has someone but is less likely.

    None of what was done here has the same provenance IMO thus not the same.
    My Ignore List: bklynny67, crovash, nastynice, natepro, OhSoSlick, spliff(TONE), zmaster52

  7. #9472
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    49,184
    Quote Originally Posted by brett05 View Post
    The context starts with underage drinking and the lack of checking ID means there isn't any underage drinking soon followed by Sluggo's example of voter fraud in a home, specifically his (could be hypothetical could be legit), the point is that when I used I assume it was within the context of sluggo's posts and dbroncos78087 replies indicating strongly he can't read or ignored his posts. It could be the first and has someone but is less likely.

    None of what was done here has the same provenance IMO thus not the same.
    Yes, just like my use indicated you must have been speaking about Trump. You were “supposing to be the case” that dbroncis78087 didn’t read Sluggo’s post because he couldn’t or ignored it.

    You used the same definition of the word I did

  8. #9473
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    49,170
    "It's not the same."

    "Yes it is."

    "No, it's not, and you're so dumb that I can't even explain to you how it's different."

    "It's not different."

    "Yes it is, and this is how."

    "You just explained how they're the same."

    Next up is the usual Brett insult; something about crayons, or needing someone more qualified to explain it to you, or that "every. single. one." thing he does for some reason.


    "It is a grotesque parody of the bazaar at Marrakech, as if dumb animals had been granted only the amount of sentience required to mock humanity."

  9. #9474
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    8,666
    Quote Originally Posted by valade16 View Post
    Yes, just like my use indicated you must have been speaking about Trump. You were “supposing to be the case” that dbroncis78087 didn’t read Sluggo’s post because he couldn’t or ignored it.

    You used the same definition of the word I did
    I see we aren't going to agree
    My Ignore List: bklynny67, crovash, nastynice, natepro, OhSoSlick, spliff(TONE), zmaster52

  10. #9475
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    America
    Posts
    108,878
    Marge Three Names suggested that a regular day American could shoot the Chinese balloon out of the sky. That’s great except for one teensy little problem…

    There isn’t a single gun in existence they can shoot 60,000 feet in the air. She is literally the dumbest among us.

  11. #9476
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Hell on Earth- Missouri
    Posts
    21,011
    Quote Originally Posted by dbroncos78087 View Post
    Marge Three Names suggested that a regular day American could shoot the Chinese balloon out of the sky. That’s great except for one teensy little problem…

    There isn’t a single gun in existence they can shoot 60,000 feet in the air. She is literally the dumbest among us.
    Ocasio Three Names suggested that the end of the world is coming no later than 2031. That's great and all, except she is literally the dumbest among us.
    GJO- You will never be forgotten. "MORE THAN MINFINITY"!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •