The Cult of Trump

[brett05]

It was completely different but you can’t tell me how?

“If you can’t explain something simply, you don’t understand it” - Albert Einstein.

It’s a very simple question, which meaning did you intend? You’re not educated enough to comprehend and say one of the meanings of the word assume? I am more educated than you one the subject it seems.

If you can't see the differences, sorry, that's on you.
If you look at the context it's quite obvious.

[valade16]

If you can't see the differences, sorry, that's on you.
If you look at the context it's quite obvious.

“I assume you meant Trump”
“I assume you ignored Sluggo”

What context makes those meanings completely different? Can you actually answer the question?

[spliff(TONE)]

Guy can't explain what he meant when repeatedly using a simple word?

Guy probably needs to watch an instructional YouTube video each morning to tie his damn shoes.

[brett05]

“I assume you meant Trump”
“I assume you ignored Sluggo”

What context makes those meanings completely different? Can you actually answer the question?

What's the context of those statements please?

[valade16]

What's the context of those statements please?

You were saying you assumed the person you responded to was ignoring Sluggo’s post because you believed it demonstrated the post was already refuted.

I was saying I assumed you were speaking about Trump because what you said also described him.

Contextually, the only definition of “assume” in those statements is the same. No other definition of the word works in those contexts. You said there are multiple definitions of assume.

So which definition of the word did you intend with that post if not “suppose to be the case”?

[brett05]

You were saying you assumed the person you responded to was ignoring Sluggo’s post because you believed it demonstrated the post was already refuted.

I was saying I assumed you were speaking about Trump because what you said also described him.

Contextually, the only definition of “assume” in those statements is the same. No other definition of the word works in those contexts. You said there are multiple definitions of assume.

So which definition of the word did you intend with that post if not “suppose to be the case”?

The context starts with underage drinking and the lack of checking ID means there isn't any underage drinking soon followed by Sluggo's example of voter fraud in a home, specifically his (could be hypothetical could be legit), the point is that when I used I assume it was within the context of sluggo's posts and dbroncos78087 replies indicating strongly he can't read or ignored his posts. It could be the first and has someone but is less likely.

None of what was done here has the same provenance IMO thus not the same.

[valade16]

The context starts with underage drinking and the lack of checking ID means there isn't any underage drinking soon followed by Sluggo's example of voter fraud in a home, specifically his (could be hypothetical could be legit), the point is that when I used I assume it was within the context of sluggo's posts and dbroncos78087 replies indicating strongly he can't read or ignored his posts. It could be the first and has someone but is less likely.

None of what was done here has the same provenance IMO thus not the same.

Yes, just like my use indicated you must have been speaking about Trump. You were “supposing to be the case” that dbroncis78087 didn’t read Sluggo’s post because he couldn’t or ignored it.

You used the same definition of the word I did

[natepro]

"It's not the same."

"Yes it is."

"No, it's not, and you're so dumb that I can't even explain to you how it's different."

"It's not different."

"Yes it is, and this is how."

"You just explained how they're the same."

Next up is the usual Brett insult; something about crayons, or needing someone more qualified to explain it to you, or that "every. single. one." thing he does for some reason.

[brett05]

Yes, just like my use indicated you must have been speaking about Trump. You were “supposing to be the case” that dbroncis78087 didn’t read Sluggo’s post because he couldn’t or ignored it.

You used the same definition of the word I did

I see we aren't going to agree

[dbroncos78087]

Marge Three Names suggested that a regular day American could shoot the Chinese balloon out of the sky. That’s great except for one teensy little problem…

There isn’t a single gun in existence they can shoot 60,000 feet in the air. She is literally the dumbest among us.

[dbroncsinmo]

Marge Three Names suggested that a regular day American could shoot the Chinese balloon out of the sky. That’s great except for one teensy little problem…

There isn’t a single gun in existence they can shoot 60,000 feet in the air. She is literally the dumbest among us.

Ocasio Three Names suggested that the end of the world is coming no later than 2031. That's great and all, except she is literally the dumbest among us.

[spliff(TONE)]

[catman]

Marge Three Names suggested that a regular day American could shoot the Chinese balloon out of the sky. That’s great except for one teensy little problem…

There isn’t a single gun in existence they can shoot 60,000 feet in the air. She is literally the dumbest among us.

The offending balloon was shot down today. The debris is in the ocean and our Navy is collecting what they can.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-down...debr-rcna69165

[dbroncos78087]

I was told there wasn’t a cult.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...-say-rcna69060

[metswon69]

I was told there wasn’t a cult.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...-say-rcna69060

Its so weird how people conflate their indoctrinated religious values with Trump. I dont get it. If Trump was a outwardly religious man, I would almost understand it but he's most certainly not. He's a narcissistic ******** who doesn't follow any of the morals and values Christian pride themselves in respect to.

But hey liberals are the crazy ones. I'm sure there are Biden supporters who would do such a thing if he lost in 2024.