
Originally Posted by
mightybosstone
To be fair to both guys, Kyrie's postseason sample size is super small compared to Lillard's. So you could argue that Lillard having as much postseason experience as he has and being capable of pushing his team to the playoffs as a No. 1 year in and year out is more impressive. On the flip side, it's hard to knock one poor postseason performance in Boston or the fact that the rest of Kyrie's postseason experience is as Lebron's No. 2.
It's easy to look at the numbers at face value and say Kyrie is the better postseason player just like it's easy to use the "but Lebron!" excuse against him. You can interpret it however you'd like. Dame clearly has not had as much help as Kyrie did in his years with Lebron, and he's had to have a greater responsibility as the alpha in Portland pretty much his whole time in the NBA.
Gun to my head, though, I am slightly more inclined to trust Kyrie's clutchness in the postseason more than Lillard's just like I'm more inclined to trust Lillard to get me to the playoffs as a No. 1 more than Kyrie.