Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 80 of 284 FirstFirst ... 3070787980818290130180 ... LastLast
Results 1,186 to 1,200 of 4260
  1. #1186
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Staten island Ny
    Posts
    32,818
    Quote Originally Posted by kyubi256 View Post
    He's shooting 38% and has as many 30% fg games as 40%

    His shot needs work

    Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk
    Heís played 11 games lol. His shots improved a lot . Heís also a playing off ball for an absolute bum in Bledsoe. Itís a joke. Heís not a bad 3 point shooter.
    Spurs Sim league
    2 time Champion 653-331

  2. #1187
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,451
    I dont know what it would cost us but Lonzo would be a nice pickup for us. The ball doesn't stick to his hands and he's young enough that we probably haven't seen what his finished product is. If we can survive with Payton running the offense we surely can survive with Lonzo who has a better jump shot. He has great height for the PG position, plays good defense, is young, has a developing 3 point shot. Thats a lot of things to like about his game. The only thing I dont like is his FT%.
    IT'S SHOWTIME!!

  3. #1188
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    12,830
    Quote Originally Posted by xxplayerxx23 View Post
    Heís played 11 games lol. His shots improved a lot . Heís also a playing off ball for an absolute bum in Bledsoe. Itís a joke. Heís not a bad 3 point shooter.
    Well I was a fan. But he was awful in the bubble. And this years numbers would disagree, heís shooting 28% on high volume. Thatís terrible.

    We could give reasons why. But Iíve been holding our guys accountable for awful shooting, so I have to do it here too. Slump or not, numbers donít lie

  4. #1189
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    49,951
    I think the kid has potential but he's not worth trying to figure it out, all we need on this team is a below 50% FT shooter, we are just finding our FT shots lol, lets keep it that way.

    As far as 3pt he shot 38% on high volume all last year, the same volume, so who knows, think he's a better shooter than his 29% this year, seen a handful of games, his shot looks fine. He makes .5 more he'd be at 36%, it's that small a difference this early in the season.

    guys have to remember it's a very weird season and it's only just begun.

  5. #1190
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    3,080
    Quote Originally Posted by ShadyOne View Post
    I canít say I disagree. If he canít do it there, I donít see him doing it at all. Thatís a great setup for him to succeed at what he should do well

    We would be in here another 3-4 years all complaining about ďwhy Thibs playing Lonzo 35 minutesĒ. Pass on that, please...

    Drive a Brinks truck full of cash over to Schroders house..
    If lonzo cant shine with ingram, zion, JJ, than what else does he need to become this great player everyone keeps talking about?

    I have no idea, but I know whatever it is, we sure as heck don't have it.

    I dont understand how anyone could get excited by a ball handler who cant shoot the 3, cant shoot free throws, is terrible around the rim, and is scared to attack the paint.

    Who cares what hes good at, if you cant do those things as a ball handler what am I suppose to do with you?

  6. #1191
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    7,223
    Scratch him if he is shooting less than 50% from the free throw line. That is unacceptable. Never understood how you become a professional and cannot shoot a free throw shot.

  7. #1192
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    parts unknown
    Posts
    54,396
    Quote Originally Posted by cssdmark View Post
    Scratch him if he is shooting less than 50% from the free throw line. That is unacceptable. Never understood how you become a professional and cannot shoot a free throw shot.
    Definitely not what you want from your PG. Quickley is going to be icing games from the line for years to come


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Rep Power: 0




    Quote Originally Posted by Raps08-09 Champ View Post
    My dick is named 'Ewing'.

  8. #1193
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    4,704
    Instead of trading for Ball, Knicks should still try to acquire talent and picks with their cap space. Unless it's a inexpensive deal. Would rather Knicks use second rounders to get Ricky Rubio or a veteran as an upgrade to Payton. Unless despite his obvious limitations Payton has been good for the team. Payton would be a good back up or third stringer.

  9. #1194
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,062
    I would try an trade for Bradley Beal.

    Frank
    IQ
    Toppin
    Noel
    picks Mavs 21 and 23
    pick Knicks 22 (protected)

    Keeping Barrett and Randle we could have a good run in the play-offs.

    Payton - Rivers - DSJ
    Beal - Burks
    Barrett - Bullock
    Randle - Knox
    Mitch - Taj

  10. #1195
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by KingKnicks View Post
    I would try an trade for Bradley Beal.

    Frank
    IQ
    Toppin
    Noel
    picks Mavs 21 and 23
    pick Knicks 22 (protected)

    Keeping Barrett and Randle we could have a good run in the play-offs.

    Payton - Rivers - DSJ
    Beal - Burks
    Barrett - Bullock
    Randle - Knox
    Mitch - Taj
    If we go after Lavine we don't have to give as much assets for him

  11. #1196
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    parts unknown
    Posts
    54,396
    Kendrick Dunn is a guy I think they should keep an eye on


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Rep Power: 0




    Quote Originally Posted by Raps08-09 Champ View Post
    My dick is named 'Ewing'.

  12. #1197
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    4,704
    Quote Originally Posted by KingKnicks View Post
    I would try an trade for Bradley Beal.

    Frank
    IQ
    Toppin
    Noel
    picks Mavs 21 and 23
    pick Knicks 22 (protected)

    Keeping Barrett and Randle we could have a good run in the play-offs.

    Payton - Rivers - DSJ
    Beal - Burks
    Barrett - Bullock
    Randle - Knox
    Mitch - Taj
    No way, the team gives up that many picks and Qyickley and Toppin. So you would have a squad with less point guard potential and less abality to get a pg with draft picks.

  13. #1198
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    7,223
    I think we should go after Lauri Markkane. Right now we have two centers that have no offensive game beyond 3 feet. We need a change of pace to have a big that can open up the floor would be nice.

  14. #1199
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    23,266
    So Knicks atleast now have 3 reliable players in Randle RJ and Quickly who else can they add in next FA to build on this.

    Sent from my HD1905 using Tapatalk

  15. #1200
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    12,830
    Quote Originally Posted by cssdmark View Post
    I think we should go after Lauri Markkane. Right now we have two centers that have no offensive game beyond 3 feet. We need a change of pace to have a big that can open up the floor would be nice.
    Heís a big PF that doesnít defend

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •