Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 610 of 945 FirstFirst ... 110510560600608609610611612620660710 ... LastLast
Results 9,136 to 9,150 of 14162
  1. #9136
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    4,898
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Detfink View Post
    Ja Morant doesn't strike me as a good fit with this current Knick squad.

    The Knicks worked very hard to get the chemistry with the current squad. They should be looking to sign a big piece or to sign/trade for a piece but only give up cosmetic pieces.
    Morant is quite a terrible FT shooter

  2. #9137
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    parts unknown
    Posts
    59,221
    Quote Originally Posted by cheetos185 View Post
    I feel we were cheated out of Zion and Ja draft it's ridiculous Knicks have been tanking so long yet they don't have one young player who can carry them on his back man wtf how can a team be horrible for 8 years and not have one legit young shot creater on there team. The Knicks are the only team in NBA that never gets top talents in draft are we ****ing cursed..

    Sent from my HD1905 using Tapatalk
    You are the worst.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Rep Power: 0




    Quote Originally Posted by Raps08-09 Champ View Post
    My dick is named 'Ewing'.

  3. #9138
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    15,049
    Quote Originally Posted by DeeJay View Post
    Morant is quite a terrible FT shooter
    Not sure if youre serious lol.

    Hes not though

  4. #9139
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    13,510
    Quote Originally Posted by ShadyOne View Post
    He is. Hes the best player on an above .500 West team. I highly doubt RJ is capable of putting up 19/7 being the main man
    Your such a hater bofl

  5. #9140
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    15,049
    Quote Originally Posted by east fb knicks View Post
    Your such a hater bofl
    Realist, not hater

    RJs playing well though

  6. #9141
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Toms River, NJ
    Posts
    9,721
    Quote Originally Posted by cheetos185 View Post
    Knicks were barely .400 team when Rose was out

    Sent from my HD1905 using Tapatalk
    RJ is still the number two scorer on the team. Hes also 20 he gets way too much flack


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  7. #9142
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    36,482
    Quote Originally Posted by cheetos185 View Post
    Knicks were barely .400 team when Rose was out

    Sent from my HD1905 using Tapatalk
    we were never a .400 before the Rose trade but just to play along...

    so if we didn't make that Rose trade we'd be a .400 team? as in 27 wins and only better than DET, CLE & ORL?

  8. #9143
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    36,482
    Fournier fills a lot of holes for this team. Scorer/shooter/playmaker, can play multiple positions including some point. and he's only 28

  9. #9144
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    25,293
    Quote Originally Posted by nycericanguy View Post
    we were never a .400 before the Rose trade but just to play along...

    so if we didn't make that Rose trade we'd be a .400 team? as in 27 wins and only better than DET, CLE & ORL?
    You can't tell me Knicks would have won lot of there games without Rose?

    Sent from my HD1905 using Tapatalk

  10. #9145
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    25,293
    Quote Originally Posted by ManningToTyree View Post
    RJ is still the number two scorer on the team. Hes also 20 he gets way too much flack


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    It's not bad if I say RJ is not the 2nd scoring option it's Rose why do you guys take it as insult like I'm calling him bust? Anyone following Knicks games religiously would admit Knicks have been Randle and Rose show.

    Sent from my HD1905 using Tapatalk

  11. #9146
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    parts unknown
    Posts
    59,221
    Quote Originally Posted by cheetos185 View Post
    You can't tell me Knicks would have won lot of there games without Rose?

    Sent from my HD1905 using Tapatalk
    What was there record before the Rose trade? Maybe take Elfs job without Rose and has a bigger impact. I won't say you cant assume the most negative outcome though lol


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Rep Power: 0




    Quote Originally Posted by Raps08-09 Champ View Post
    My dick is named 'Ewing'.

  12. #9147
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    parts unknown
    Posts
    59,221
    Quote Originally Posted by cheetos185 View Post
    It's not bad if I say RJ is not the 2nd scoring option it's Rose why do you guys take it as insult like I'm calling him bust? Anyone following Knicks games religiously would admit Knicks have been Randle and Rose show.

    Sent from my HD1905 using Tapatalk
    Recently Rose has been our second most important player for the season I still think it is Barrett though


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Rep Power: 0




    Quote Originally Posted by Raps08-09 Champ View Post
    My dick is named 'Ewing'.

  13. #9148
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    15,049
    Just to elaborate. I wasnt hating on RJ at all. Its impossible to say year 2 wasnt a big step in the right direction. I still have doubts hes the type of guy that can be the man that teams key on. But hes right on the doorstep of being a really nice support piece.

    He needs to really improve his mid range/shot creation for that to happen. But I think he can be a really nice #3 guy alongside elite talent, fringe 2 at times

    I also think as currently constituted, everyone is a notch up in importance from what they should be. But even adding another #2/3 guy would be big. Someone that would take away the need for Randle/Rose/RJ from needing to bring it every night.
    Last edited by ShadyOne; 05-13-2021 at 06:16 PM.

  14. #9149
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    36,482
    Quote Originally Posted by cheetos185 View Post
    You can't tell me Knicks would have won lot of there games without Rose?

    Sent from my HD1905 using Tapatalk
    Rose has been great, sure he's added a few wins, certainly not 11! he also wasn't great when he first came over, and then was out for a while. Knicks were over .500 with RJ as the #2 was my point.

  15. #9150
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    25,293
    Quote Originally Posted by nycericanguy View Post
    Rose has been great, sure he's added a few wins, certainly not 11! he also wasn't great when he first came over, and then was out for a while. Knicks were over .500 with RJ as the #2 was my point.
    In 2nd half of the season Knicks wouldn't be .500 without Rose. Maybe if Burks and Mitch didn't get injured they might be borderline .500 but it's not same lvl of impact as Rose is bringing.

    Sent from my HD1905 using Tapatalk

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •