wouldn't surprise me. look at all the young guards we've passed on recently, in FAgency and the draft. we're stuck in the 90'sSources say the Knicks’ first priority for a wing was to get Gordon Hayward and that they told Beasley if they missed out they were coming after him. The Knicks had the cap space, and it would be conceivable that Thibs wouldn’t have minded stealing away a player the Wolves gave up a first-round pick for at the trade deadline.
The Wolves went in with an aggressive pitch to Beasley right away when free agency opened, knowing that if the Knicks extended an offer sheet they could include some onerous terms in the paperwork to make life miserable for Minnesota. This is also Minnesota, a place that has historically had major difficulty recruiting players to sign. The Wolves often have to pay a little extra to get a player, and they really wanted to retain Beasley. He plays fast, hits 3s and attacks the rim, all tenets of their offensive philosophy.
Beasley, sources said, appreciated the support he’s received from the Wolves since his legal issues came to light, likes playing for Ryan Saunders and believes that a core that includes Towns, Russell, Edwards and himself can grow together into a formidable team.
So rather than wait to see if the Knicks were going to extend an offer, which very well could have come since they did miss out on Hayward, Beasley agreed to terms on the spot. The Wolves did get a little bit of protection with a team option for the fourth year, meaning it is essentially a three-year, $44 million deal. When looking at free-agent contracts for Hayward (four years, $120 million), Jordan Clarkson (4/52), Jerami Grant (3/60), Joe Harris (4/75), Marcus Morris (4/64) and Davis Bertans (5/80), the Beasley deal looks more reasonable.
We seriously told Beasley to wait and see if we missed out on Hayward?