I had already moved on and have been discussing other potential QB options but brooklyn67 still wants to bring up nonsense to get in the last word.
I had already moved on and have been discussing other potential QB options but brooklyn67 still wants to bring up nonsense to get in the last word.
Sponsored Links |
|
I'm not too worried about cap space. The Jets will cut players like Lawson, Davis, Berrios, etc and can restructure current players to get more space. I saw a Jets Youtuber lay out how the Jets could create 60 million dollars in cap space this offseason if they reworked certain current deals and released others.
Obviously they have to bring back Quinnen but the cap isn't going anywhere but up for the foreseeable future.
No, I was not referring to any individual when I said, another shepherd. It was a metaphor.
(You know. It could be politicians, media pundits, bloggers, celebrities...)
Funny you said you didn't use racist language (which isn't what I said) but left out not being all those other things in the quote to which you responded.
Ignorance is bliss
What is going on here..... I leave for a few days and its a war zone in here.
Can't we all just agree that Woody Allen is innocent and did nothing wrong!
![]()
Sponsored Links |
|
I didn't realize that!! That's actually amazing. I think he should be paid. However, the cut throat part of me thinks, "he's not sitting for 3 years". So if the jets have him this year and could FT him for the following 2? That's effectively a 3 year deal.
Now, would he take a 4-5 year deal at a bit of a reduced rate if they bumped him this year?
What would be realistic for him?
4 years for 80-100? 5 for 120? (I don't think he should get Donald money)
If they could get him at 4 for 90 or 5 for 100-120, it might be the way to go.
Then again, they have him for 10 this year and likely the FT will be around 12-14? (I think I read it correctly that the FT is 120% of their highest salary or the league average.)
So 3 years at under 40 mil?
I am guessing he and his agent know this well and maybe they ask for something in the 18 per range for 4-5 years. The jets should jump on that. It would only be an 8 mil hit to the salary cap this year.
Thank you for reminding me. I was thinking they had to allocate 25 for him and that wouldn't leave too much to help elsewhere. Knowing he's on the books makes 40 mil go way farther!
Ignorance is bliss
As much as I want Rodgers, he and the Packers have to make a decision soon on whether they plan on being together next year or not. The last thing the Jets need is to be stuck with guys like Mayfield, Brissett, Tannehill, etc as QB options because guys like Carr, Garapolo, etc went elsewhere.
Last edited by metswon69; 02-04-2023 at 04:00 PM.
Yup, we have him this year on his rookie contract of $9.6M (I believe the “5th year option”)
Next year a DT franchise tag would be estimated to be $21.4M (up from $19M for 2023 season), the 2025 season let’s say is $26M with the 120% premium for players tagged a second time
I know players hate it, but he could be constrained by the Jets for 3 years totaling $57M (2023 through 2025 seasons)
We could look at the DeForest Buckner and Chris Jones deals as a recent comps from 2020 for interior defensive lineman. I agree Donald is on another planet and is not a reasonable comp
Buckner: Similar draft status, sack totals similar too, he sighed a 4/$84M ($44M guaranteed) contract extension for his age 26 season (2020)
Jones: Similar sack totals, he signed a 4 year $80M contract ($60M guaranteed) contract for his age 26 season (2020)
Looking at the above deals, I believe Jones took less AAV in order to get a higher guaranteed contract vs Buckner who can be released today with no dead money despite the higher AAV
For QW, following similar players from just 2.5 years ago, a comparable deal would be 4 years $90M. Add in Bidenflation, 4 years $900000M…just kidding, or not
However, I think we’re looking at a 6 year deal (5 year extension). An additional 2 years to soften the blow on the cap. Would 6 year $126M ($65M guaranteed) get it done? I think that might make everyone happy, it’s a headline grabbing deal that “resets” the interior defensive lineman market, QW has bragging rights, and the team has the flexibility to get out of or restructure the deal down the line
Personally, I totally agree. I want hem to get him signed long term. My question is, what do people think would get that done? If he's looking for 25+ per? It's tough.
5 at 100? Is a big raise for him, would pay him top of the market (aside from Donald).
5 at 110 or 4 at 90 would, I believe, make him the second highest paid DL after Donald
I agree, don't mess around with him.
My scenario was looking from a pure cutthroat, perspective. They have him for 3 years if they want him. They don't need to give him a deal.
I absolutely think it's better to get him a deal that they can live with and that makes him happy
Ignorance is bliss
Sponsored Links |
|