Quote Originally Posted by ciaban2.0 View Post
It's not just me who's asking the question.


At what point do we consider the dodgers a dynasty?

They should have at least 2 maybe 3 titles if they weren't getting cheated. If they win Back-Back are they a dynasty?
This is subjective of course. But I feel like you need to win more than twice to be a dynasty. And two of those should be back to back. The Giants make a case in when they won 2010, 2012, 2014. But I still really feel like you need two in a row at some point and a third that's very close to the other two.

Can't use the cheating argument, because they cheated against everyone. A few of those regular season games go differently and they could have different matchups all the way throughout the playoffs. You can't just give it to another team.