Sponsored Links |
|
What the GM does and the baseball Ops is kind of shifting. We lived in a world 10 years ago where we barely talked about VP of Ops and it was all "GM, GM, GM". Today, it seems to have shifted up. Your VP is basically what the GM was, the GM has become the "assistant to the GM" and so-forth. I think in many ways it was a way to circumvent contracts and hire outside of the org the GM you wanted (for example, Porter and Samayde, both of Arizona's assistan GM's who are on the Cubs wish list, I'd assume, based on their track record and their connections to the Cubs FO would both have been able to be hired as a GM probably 3-5 years ago. Now their contracts have stipulations that it must be for a VP position outside of the org or they can block the interview).
In the end, it's another voice. It's more ideas. Jed is going to run the big picture. Your GM may handle more day to day stuff, handle initial trade stuff...but they're going to be very important. They're the number 2 guy. Take it this way; according to Theo, it was Jed pushing for Pedro Strop in trades. The Cubs got half a decade out of Pedro Strop as a high leverage reliever. Doesn't that kind of just pay for the GM itself? Hard to say it's a waste of money.
So now, we need Jed's guy who says "Dude, make sure you get that guy".
It could. But at this stage it's probably best to look at every opening as a potential landing spot for our guys, and less of the Cubs as a landing spot for anyone else. It's becoming clearer and clearer; we ain't trying to be a winner next year. More opening spots; creates a bigger market for what is going to be, I think, a crowded, depressed market.
https://twitter.com/BleacherNation/s...588631052?s=19
Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk
This is exactly how I view it also.
I don't understand why things changed. If you have a general manager and assistant general manager, that's essentially the same as a president and general manager.
Most teams have always used 2 heads. I feel like it cost more money doing it this way because of their titles
https://twitter.com/BleacherNation/s...286830599?s=19
Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk
Sponsored Links |
|
So that you could hire guys away. It was a title change, nothing more. If a contract says "you can't move latterly" than you have to "move them up". So the GM becomes VP. Bingo. They're still doing the same job.
It was semantics. But it circumvented contractual language.
Sent from my SM-G981V using Tapatalk
I’m a big fan of how the DBacks have drafted the last few years. They’ve built an excellent farm system while being over .500 3 straight years before 2020.
Even if the Cubs can’t get one of their assistant GMs, I’d love to see some trades with Arizona in the next year.
What more did Hoyer need to do as GM other than be another intelligent voice that Theo trusted to be doing his job? It'd be pretty overwhelming/terrifying to not have second opinons on... Pretty much any move you make as an MLB executive.
Of course we can't be completely certain what exactly what Hoyer's job looked like as GM, but in my head, he was right there in the room with Theo helping make virtually all decisions. Theo just had the final say.
Sponsored Links |
|