
Originally Posted by
mngopher35
It doesn’t assume everything they have done, it could just mean some of it.
Every decision is already being politicized essentially anyways.
Again the goal isn’t to fix everything necessarily just with this it would be that the ends justify the means and allow some change that may not currently be possible, in part due to the politicization that’s already occurred around the courts. I am open to other ideas as I said this route is not necessarily my choice but what would you suggest? If it includes letting what has happened continue or relying on the main causes of issues to drastically change for little reason I think the above argument grows stronger.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
16 year terms where 1 term expires every election year and an odd number of justices. Each inaugaration the new/re-elected president appoints someone to fill the newly vacated space. Start the process by changing the oldest current justice's term to 4 years
gotta love 'referential' treatment