The democrats don't get what they want because they didn't win the election.
The democrats don't get what they want because they didn't win the election.
Bachelors III . . . In the Inn. . . Lanas Garage 4/18/75 . . . lpswitch with Snake, Hards and Mendy . . .B.D.W.B. . . Ambition: I want Dooleys Job . . . Saturday Night Live . . . Bathroom Brawls . . . Living at Snakes . . . WHERE IS MUSKY. - John Tortorella
Sponsored Links |
|
That assumes everything SCOTUS has done with the current balance is bad for the country and everything SCOTUS would do if the balance shifted would be good for the country.......when all it's doing is further politicizing every damn decision made, making a clean sweep of government branches following tribalism more than good of the country.
gotta love 'referential' treatment
If they do this, and I have no problem with it, it's a fairly good idea and somewhat of a compromise, but it should be grandfathered in and only apply to new appointments or those that have not yet served for 18 years.
I don't know how many judges have been there for 18 years or more but it would cause issues for several to have to leave all at once.
Let the oldtimers stay until they want to retire and the 18 year rule will work itself out.
If either side expands the court, I really do like the idea that there should be a massive expansion to create multiple benches and increase the caseload they can take on. They reject most of the cases that get to them and the power they have in case law shouldn’t be so limited.
And yeah we need term limits across the board. House, Senate, SCOTUS, Appeals Circuit, etc
Sponsored Links |
|
Sponsored Links |
|