This is why they kneel

[SiteWolf]

okay so now we are getting somewhere.

so if a President should not make a pre determined conclusion based on evidence of some, why was it okay for Reese to make a pre determined conclusion based on evidence of some?

cheese and rice, are you REALLY STILL wanting to hold a TEENAGER responsible for being apprehensive about police officers approaching him while alone in the dark?!

and we never have gotten into the fact someone had called for a wellness check, so maybe he WASN'T feeling quite right from an emotional standpoint...hence the call

[SpecialFNK]

cheese and rice, are you REALLY STILL wanting to hold a TEENAGER responsible for being apprehensive about police officers approaching him while alone in the dark?!

and we never have gotten into the fact someone had called for a wellness check, so maybe he WASN'T feeling quite right from an emotional standpoint...hence the call

when someone (doesn't matter who) is wrong is misjudging people then that deserves criticism. I have brought up examples of other situations where it was not fair, so why was this one different?

police should not be misjudged before anything happens, just like any other group of people.

[SiteWolf]

when someone (doesn't matter who) is wrong is misjudging people then that deserves criticism. I have brought up examples of other situations where it was not fair, so why was this one different?

police should not be misjudged before anything happens, just like any other group of people.

Why was it different?!
YOU YOURSELF used a 5% Reese 95% Police 'fault' ratio
My guess is, THAT'S why he doesn't.

I bear more than 5% blame for being hit by a drunk driver on the highway...do I deserver criticism?

You also have no proof the officers were misjudged....before during or after....he just wanted to go home, for cripes sakes

[Scoots]

when someone (doesn't matter who) is wrong is misjudging people then that deserves criticism. I have brought up examples of other situations where it was not fair, so why was this one different?

police should not be misjudged before anything happens, just like any other group of people.

You are wrong. You are misjudging people. You deserve criticism.

[valade16]

okay so now we are getting somewhere.

so if a President should not make a pre determined conclusion based on evidence of some, why was it okay for Reese to make a pre determined conclusion based on evidence of some?

Where did he make a pre-determined conclusion of all police officers?

[SiteWolf]

Where did he make a pre-determined conclusion of all police officers?

he didn't even ask them to stop at his house for a cup of coffee...I mean, seriously!

[spliff(TONE)]

Why was it different?!
YOU YOURSELF used a 5% Reese 95% Police 'fault' ratio
My guess is, THAT'S why he doesn't.

I bear more than 5% blame for being hit by a drunk driver on the highway...do I deserver criticism?

You also have no proof the officers were misjudged....before during or after....he just wanted to go home, for cripes sakes

You'll never get through to him.

[SiteWolf]

You'll never get through to him.

I know, but it's still fun to try sometimes.

[Crovash]

I know, but it's still fun to try sometimes.

OK, fine. Suit yourself , but please limit your quoting of him (especially his long-winded posts). He’s on ignore for a reason.

[SpecialFNK]

Why was it different?!
YOU YOURSELF used a 5% Reese 95% Police 'fault' ratio
My guess is, THAT'S why he doesn't.

I bear more than 5% blame for being hit by a drunk driver on the highway...do I deserver criticism?

You also have no proof the officers were misjudged....before during or after....he just wanted to go home, for cripes sakes

Where did he make a pre-determined conclusion of all police officers?

he said so himself.

https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1364416025731751938

"Young Black men like me, we're scared of the police because they kill and arrest us," Rodney Reese said. "That's why I didn't want to answer a question, I wanted to go home."

literally before anything happened with these officers, he already had his mind made up on what police in general must be like.

if anyone made a judgement before anything about black people/Muslims everyone knows damn well that would not be acceptable, so why is it fair on police in general.

are all black people criminals? no.
are all Muslims terrorists? no.

but all police must kill and/or arrest black people? why is this generalization okay?

[nastynice]

are all black people criminals? no.
are all Muslims terrorists? no.

But if we treat them like so you would totally understand the reasoning, right?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[SpecialFNK]

But if we treat them like so you would totally understand the reasoning, right?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

of course not. I said I understood about people coming from other countries, that had nothing at all to do with anyone already in America.

at this point there wont be any honesty, nobody is going to see the point that generalizing a group of people is wrong. I guess we have to wait until the next time it happens.

[valade16]

he said so himself.

https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1364416025731751938


literally before anything happened with these officers, he already had his mind made up on what police in general must be like.

if anyone made a judgement before anything about black people/Muslims everyone knows damn well that would not be acceptable, so why is it fair on police in general.

are all black people criminals? no.
are all Muslims terrorists? no.

but all police must kill and/or arrest black people? why is this generalization okay?

Where did he use the word all?

[SpecialFNK]

Where did he use the word all?

""Young Black men like me, we're scared of the police"

the police, not these police. this is a generalization.

[valade16]

""Young Black men like me, we're scared of the police"

the police, not these police. this is a generalization.

Again, I don’t see him saying all police.