This is why they kneel

[joeyc77]

So basically you won't even support a $1-2 hike in the minimum wage because some politicians and people support a $15 minimum wage? I think you just don't want to raise the minimum wage at all...

As for the corporations, yeah they can. In fact, they've been doing inversions with overseas companies to avoid US taxes and regulations. But we can actually draft laws making it more difficult for overseas companies to compete in the US, and we could even help their competitors if they choose to leave for overseas.

Heck, doing so falls right in line with Trump's whole "put America first" mantra.

They aren’t asking for a $1-2 raise in the minimum wage. They are asking for an undefined term in a “livable wage.” That’s the problem. You can’t negotiate with someone who can’t define what their goals are or at least won’t let them be known. You are talking in definable terms ($1-2). But the side asking for the raise aren’t using such terms, not ones that are reasonable.

[ewing]

They aren’t asking for a $1-2 raise in the minimum wage. They are asking for an undefined term in a “livable wage.” That’s the problem. You can’t negotiate with someone who can’t define what their goals are or at least won’t let them be known. You are talking in definable terms ($1-2). But the side asking for the raise aren’t using such terms, not ones that are reasonable.

They is us having a conversation on an internet board


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ewing]

It'll cripple the economy and life as we know it!

Its like some people think agreeing with a liberal is a slippery slope. If they concede anything they will wind up a gay socialist


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[joeyc77]

They is us having a conversation on an internet board and BS


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They are the protestors and furthermore the politicians who could actually make a change. Speaking in non defined terms is poor form and creepy.

And believe it or not, the idiots on this internet board aren’t solving anything. We literally accomplish nothing.

[ewing]

They are the protestors and furthermore the politicians who could actually make a change. Speaking in non defined terms is poor form and creepy.

And believe it or not, the idiots on this internet board aren’t solving anything. We literally accomplish nothing.

We have conversation. Vlade asked you a question. You responded with a rant about some made up scheming they.

If they are protesters I’ve heard 15 most commonly


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[valade16]

They aren’t asking for a $1-2 raise in the minimum wage. They are asking for an undefined term in a “livable wage.” That’s the problem. You can’t negotiate with someone who can’t define what their goals are or at least won’t let them be known. You are talking in definable terms ($1-2). But the side asking for the raise aren’t using such terms, not ones that are reasonable.

Ewing already covered it but if you have a problem with what "they" want, go yell at them. I'm asking for $1-2 raise to the minimum wage and you are refusing because of some nefarious "they".

Also, they haven't defined their goals or won't let them be known? What are you talking about? You've been bringing up their $15 an hour goal for awhile now. What they want is very clear: they want $15 an hour minimum wage.

You disagree. And you're using that disagreement to also oppose a $10 minimum wage, and a $9 minimum wage, or any minimum wage increase at all. I suspect it's because your actual goal is to not let the minimum wage be raised at all.

[SiteWolf]

Its like some people think agreeing with a liberal is slippery slope. If they concede anything they will wind up a gay socialist


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

wait, they won't?!

[dbroncsinmo]

So, is everyone even? 2 LAPD deputies got shot in the head today while sitting in their squad car. 2 for 2, are we ****ing done now? Or do we need to make it 3 for 3?

[dbroncsinmo]

Its like some people think agreeing with a liberal is a slippery slope. If they concede anything they will wind up a gay socialist


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Agree with a conservative Trump supporter and see how that goes.

And before the usual...poor trump, poor conservatives blah blah blah.

[spliff(TONE)]

So, is everyone even? 2 LAPD deputies got shot in the head today while sitting in their squad car. 2 for 2, are we ****ing done now? Or do we need to make it 3 for 3?

Holy **** are you cool and tough. Teach me how to Dougie when you have the time, please.

[joeyc77]

We have conversation. Vlade asked you a question. You responded with a rant about some made up scheming they.

If they are protesters I’ve heard 15 most commonly


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ewing already covered it but if you have a problem with what "they" want, go yell at them. I'm asking for $1-2 raise to the minimum wage and you are refusing because of some nefarious "they".

Also, they haven't defined their goals or won't let them be known? What are you talking about? You've been bringing up their $15 an hour goal for awhile now. What they want is very clear: they want $15 an hour minimum wage.

You disagree. And you're using that disagreement to also oppose a $10 minimum wage, and a $9 minimum wage, or any minimum wage increase at all. I suspect it's because your actual goal is to not let the minimum wage be raised at all.

For the purpose of this conversation, I don’t care about raising the minimum wage $1-2. But we are also discussing why reasonable goals are not accomplished. This is an issue with our political system and especially pertains to the issues in this thread.

No one believes black lives don’t matter. To even suggest this is an issue in 2020 is ridiculous. Everyone agrees cops shouldn’t kill civilians, regardless of race. Yet here we are.

As far as minimum wage, the side that you support is not being reasonable in their goals. Asking for absurd amounts or undefinable terms like a living wage is not a starting point. This is a tactic used by politicians. It’s like making abortion illegal. It’s an absurd premise to tell women what they can or can’t do with their bodies. Our goal as a country should be to limit abortions by any means possible. Yet we have two sides arguing over non starters (Woman’s rights vs killing babies) that don’t really pertain to the issue or solve anything. It’s the same with police involved deaths. Our goal as a country should be to limit this as much as possible by any means and reprimand individuals when this occurs, while accepting we can’t control people. Ending racism is a non starter because it’s an unattainable goal. Yet here we are.

[ewing]

For the purpose of this conversation, I don’t care about raising the minimum wage $1-2. But we are also discussing why reasonable goals are not accomplished. This is an issue with our political system and especially pertains to the issues in this thread.

No one believes black lives don’t matter. To even suggest this is an issue in 2020 is ridiculous. Everyone agrees cops shouldn’t kill civilians, regardless of race. Yet here we are.

As far as minimum wage, the side that you support is not being reasonable in their goals. Asking for absurd amounts or undefinable terms like a living wage is not a starting point. This is a tactic used by politicians. It’s like making abortion illegal. It’s an absurd premise to tell women what they can or can’t do with their bodies. Our goal as a country should be to limit abortions by any means possible. Yet we have two sides arguing over non starters (Woman’s rights vs killing babies) that don’t really pertain to the issue or solve anything. It’s the same with police involved deaths. Our goal as a country should be to limit this as much as possible by any means and reprimand individuals when this occurs, while accepting we can’t control people. Ending racism is a non starter because it’s an unattainable goal. Yet here we are.

Protesters are people asking for big change. rarely in history do they get big change. if they do it usually occurs only if they cause some kind of change in govt structure. More often some of their more digestible ideas get co-opted by the mainstream or they spur some smaller change by brining attention to an issue that had been ignored. They almost never actually pass laws themselves. Often they don’t even have unified demands or desires.
I think reasonable goals don’t get passed bc some people are against them.

Would you support a 2 buck increase in the federal min wage or are you only ok with it for “the purpose of this conversation”? I don’t know what that means
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Scoots]

Its like some people think agreeing with a liberal is a slippery slope. If they concede anything they will wind up a gay socialist

Sexist

[Scoots]

Protesters are people asking for big change. rarely in history do they get big change. if they do it usually occurs only if they cause some kind of change in govt structure. More often some of their more digestible ideas get co-opted by the mainstream or they spur some smaller change by brining attention to an issue that had been ignored. They almost never actually pass laws themselves. Often they don’t even have unified demands or desires.
I think reasonable goals don’t get passed bc some people are against them.

Would you support a 2 buck increase in the federal min wage or are you only ok with it for “the purpose of this conversation”? I don’t know what that means

I think we need to get the structural change. We need to replace the people who talk a good game but who don't really want change.

[joeyc77]

Protesters are people asking for big change. rarely in history do they get big change. if they do it usually occurs only if they cause some kind of change in govt structure. More often some of their more digestible ideas get co-opted by the mainstream or they spur some smaller change by brining attention to an issue that had been ignored. They almost never actually pass laws themselves. Often they don’t even have unified demands or desires.
I think reasonable goals don’t get passed bc some people are against them.

Would you support a 2 buck increase in the federal min wage or are you only ok with it for “the purpose of this conversation”? I don’t know what that means
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Politicians are supporting those protestors though and they are using undefined terms instead of solid amounts because they know $15 is not achievable and will kill small businesses. They won’t define the term “livable wage” because they know there’s no amount lower than $15 which would satisfy those protestors. $1-2 appears to be a slap in their face and would be a loss for those politicians.