Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 17 of 28 FirstFirst ... 7151617181927 ... LastLast
Results 241 to 255 of 413

Thread: Dak Tagged

  1. #241
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    5,037
    Quote Originally Posted by Bullseyed View Post
    Sure. But also Dak was a top 5 QB last year, and lots of his competition in the top 10 is poised to retire soon (Brady, Brees, Ben, Rivers... Rodgers won't be too far off either). It is hard to say that Dak won't be a top 5 QB in 3 years.

    Wentz might be, if he recovers from injury and can match his performance the year he got outplayed by his backup.
    lol, again, if you assume everyone plays in a vacuum he was statistically a top 5 QB, but anyone with a brain can tell he's not a top 10 QB.

    or do I have to yet again mention that most of his stats came in the 6 games he played against bottom 5 teams
    Quote Originally Posted by NormSizedMidget View Post
    It's different now than it was.

    When he won the second one, Giants fans are here we're outside of their minds.
    That quote always cracks me up.

  2. #242
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Metroplex
    Posts
    2,634
    Quote Originally Posted by basch152 View Post
    lol, again, if you assume everyone plays in a vacuum he was statistically a top 5 QB, but anyone with a brain can tell he's not a top 10 QB.

    or do I have to yet again mention that most of his stats came in the 6 games he played against bottom 5 teams
    I forgot that all QBs have completely equal distribution of production across all 16 games thats why all the good QBs go 16 and 0. Dont be an imbecile during these tough coronavirus times. Think a little.

  3. #243
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    5,037
    Quote Originally Posted by zookman65 View Post
    I forgot that all QBs have completely equal distribution of production across all 16 games thats why all the good QBs go 16 and 0. Dont be an imbecile during these tough coronavirus times. Think a little.
    no, it's why the cowboys were an abysmal 2-8 in games against not bottom 5 teams, beating only the rams and the eagles.

    and again, he was mostly abysmal in almost every single one of those games. he did well against the Vikings who sported an abysmal pass defense, and he did good vs the rams, and had some garbage stats against the pack.

    a good QB doesn't consistantly do jack **** against even average or better teams

    they averaged a whopping 17 points in their losses, while still having arguably the best oline in the NFL and a top 5 rush attack.
    Last edited by basch152; 03-29-2020 at 12:39 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by NormSizedMidget View Post
    It's different now than it was.

    When he won the second one, Giants fans are here we're outside of their minds.
    That quote always cracks me up.

  4. #244
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,668
    Quote Originally Posted by basch152 View Post
    lol, again, if you assume everyone plays in a vacuum he was statistically a top 5 QB, but anyone with a brain can tell he's not a top 10 QB.

    or do I have to yet again mention that most of his stats came in the 6 games he played against bottom 5 teams
    Same with Wentz . He stat padded against Washington , Giants and Miami so I guess neither of them are top 10 .

  5. #245
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,668
    Quote Originally Posted by basch152 View Post
    no, it's why the cowboys were an abysmal 2-8 in games against not bottom 5 teams, beating only the rams and the eagles.

    and again, he was mostly abysmal in almost every single one of those games. he did well against the Vikings who sported an abysmal pass defense, and he did good vs the rams, and had some garbage stats against the pack.

    a good QB doesn't consistantly do jack **** against even average or better teams

    they averaged a whopping 17 points in their losses, while still having arguably the best oline in the NFL and a top 5 rush attack.
    Have you been reading any of this stuff . You seem a little late to the party ...lol.. Eagles were 1-6 against good teams in games they werenít carried by the running game . Come on man keep up .

  6. #246
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bethlehem
    Posts
    40,579
    Quote Originally Posted by surf and turf View Post
    Have you been reading any of this stuff . You seem a little late to the party ...lol.. Eagles were 1-6 against good teams in games they werenít carried by the running game . Come on man keep up .
    Heís never argued for Wentz. If you ever actually truly follow what he says.

    You can talk about Dak without everything having to relate to Wentz. Itís a simple concept.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack of Blades View Post
    I don't consider Brand New indie. I consider them ****ing awesome and don't belong to a genre.

  7. #247
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,668
    Quote Originally Posted by koldjerky View Post
    Heís never argued for Wentz. If you ever actually truly follow what he says.

    You can talk about Dak without everything having to relate to Wentz. Itís a simple concept.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Well itís funny because I didnít see Carsonís name in his evaluation but what he is saying is true for both players . You donít have to be a Eagle fan to be a hater . Or to be checked by me . Thatís why I just think itís easier to just #checkyourself

  8. #248
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    In a crib
    Posts
    35,302
    Quote Originally Posted by koldjerky View Post
    Heís never argued for Wentz. If you ever actually truly follow what he says.

    You can talk about Dak without everything having to relate to Wentz. Itís a simple concept.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    To surf any conversation about dak has to also include wentz

    Your baby can't do this

  9. #249
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,396
    Quote Originally Posted by surf and turf View Post
    Well itís funny because I didnít see Carsonís name in his evaluation but what he is saying is true for both players . You donít have to be a Eagle fan to be a hater . Or to be checked by me . Thatís why I just think itís easier to just #checkyourself
    Whatís even funnier is that Stafford is 7 and 58 against teams with winning records. Lol
    Dak has more wins against teams with winning records in four years then Stafford in 11 years.
    But again some stats are only relevant when discussing Dak.

  10. #250
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    13,178
    I keep seeing these articles on Cowboys fan sites and stuff about Dak and they always say how Dak has special leadership qualities. What the hell does that mean? Iíve never seen or heard of specific examples of this or anything.

    Just seems to weird to have something so built up but so invisible.

  11. #251
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,668
    Quote Originally Posted by Mamba42 View Post
    I keep seeing these articles on Cowboys fan sites and stuff about Dak and they always say how Dak has special leadership qualities. What the hell does that mean? Iíve never seen or heard of specific examples of this or anything.

    Just seems to weird to have something so built up but so invisible.
    I think itís just comments from the lockeroom . I canít remember another players leadership praised so much from such a early age ...

    Actually scratch that .. Russel Wilson was talked about that way before he started his first game

  12. #252
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,668
    Quote Originally Posted by mariner4life View Post
    Whatís even funnier is that Stafford is 7 and 58 against teams with winning records. Lol
    Dak has more wins against teams with winning records in four years then Stafford in 11 years.
    But again some stats are only relevant when discussing Dak.
    Lol... I didnít even know they kept stats for the Lions or Iíd have checked .

  13. #253
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    In a crib
    Posts
    35,302

    Dak Tagged

    Quote Originally Posted by Mamba42 View Post
    I keep seeing these articles on Cowboys fan sites and stuff about Dak and they always say how Dak has special leadership qualities. What the hell does that mean? Iíve never seen or heard of specific examples of this or anything.

    Just seems to weird to have something so built up but so invisible.
    I think itís just something to give the fans to talk about. Iíve heard it on here on psd a million times, hell even surf compares dak to Tom Brady because of it

    Your baby can't do this

  14. #254
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    In a crib
    Posts
    35,302
    Truth is itís really hard to know what to believe when it comes to comments about leadership. I mean what are teammates supposed to say when they are asked directly about a players leadership ďuh yeah I love _____ so much as a person but man heís a terrible leader. Absolutely horrible.. But hey, heís still a great guy..Ē

    Your baby can't do this

  15. #255
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    7,768
    Quote Originally Posted by Mamba42 View Post
    I keep seeing these articles on Cowboys fan sites and stuff about Dak and they always say how Dak has special leadership qualities. What the hell does that mean? Iíve never seen or heard of specific examples of this or anything.

    Just seems to weird to have something so built up but so invisible.
    Youíve never heard of some people being natural leaders? Youíve never heard of a QB being a natural leader? Do you not see the importance of having your QB be the unquestioned leader of your team?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Page 17 of 28 FirstFirst ... 7151617181927 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •