Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 31
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    A Firehouse
    Posts
    34,638

    Tono Romo to make 17 million per as a CBS football broadcaster.

    https://nypost.com/2020/02/28/nfl-an...mpression=true

    Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
    He is talking about the one and only, pure trash: Ereck Flowers

    Quote Originally Posted by cowboyskilla View Post
    His stern face can give that impression but I don't feel that's the case. New York isn't an easy place to play at, so honestly I can see his confidence at an all-time low for him.

    I don't think he's a bust. I think he just needs the right motivation to pick himself up & play harder.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    20,198
    He's officially got the best job in the world lol

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    111,868
    yup insanit.. good for him though

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    2,208
    Good for him. He's a student of the game, I don't mind listening to him talk football.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,667
    He’s making the same money as a elite WR . What a freaking gig .

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    19,770
    Well deserved.
    He is much better at his job than the majority if not all of his equals in the same role, so I feel like he should be compensated for it.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    36,898
    I can see why NFL players are saying no to the CBA. This type of money to an announcer means the NFL is going to make huge gains in their new tv deals. If I'm the players, I don't say yes anytime soon. Not until I have a clearer picture of what the tv money is going to look like.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    35,859
    Quote Originally Posted by metswon69 View Post
    I can see why NFL players are saying no to the CBA. This type of money to an announcer means the NFL is going to make huge gains in their new tv deals. If I'm the players, I don't say yes anytime soon. Not until I have a clearer picture of what the tv money is going to look like.
    Michael Thomas needs to realize that CBS is paying Romo, not the NFL.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,667
    I wonder who’s got more money the networks or the owners .

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    36,898
    Quote Originally Posted by goingfor28 View Post
    Michael Thomas needs to realize that CBS is paying Romo, not the NFL.
    Yes but much of the NFL's ridiculous profit comes from its tv rights. That trickles down to the teams and owners. Thats why the owners are in such a rush to get a CBA done. They want it to happen before the players realize how much money these networks are going to throw at the NFL.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    7,767
    Quote Originally Posted by metswon69 View Post
    Yes but much of the NFL's ridiculous profit comes from its tv rights. That trickles down to the teams and owners. Thats why the owners are in such a rush to get a CBA done. They want it to happen before the players realize how much money these networks are going to throw at the NFL.
    I think the owners thought if they took weed off the banned list the players would immediately cave no matter how bad the deal is.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Earth is my turf
    Posts
    5,061
    I wonder if this contract makes guys think about getting in the booth earlier than later in their career. That is a remarkable amount of money to be in football and not take hits.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    http://www.logo-designer.co/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Real-Madrid-football-club-logo-design-branding-identity-Ruben-Ferlo.jpg

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    10,301
    Quote Originally Posted by metswon69 View Post
    I can see why NFL players are saying no to the CBA. This type of money to an announcer means the NFL is going to make huge gains in their new tv deals. If I'm the players, I don't say yes anytime soon. Not until I have a clearer picture of what the tv money is going to look like.
    The players get approximately half whatever the TV deal is under the new CBA.

    The utter ignorance in your comment though is common amongst NFL players. They vote on a CBA despite having no idea how it works.
    Dak: 15,778 @ 65.8%, 7.6 per att, 97+21 TD, 36 INT+31 FMB, 97.0 Rate
    Wentz: 14,191 @ 63.8%, 6.9 per att, 97+3 TD, 35 INT+48 FMB, 92.7 Rate



    Quote Originally Posted by BDawk4Prez View Post
    I'll leave PSD if Foles isn't the starter in Jax (or elsewhere) next year.
    "Hater" is a term used by weak minded people in the face of legitimate criticism.
    -Scott van Pelt

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Middle America
    Posts
    10,456
    Cowboys have the broadcasting game locked down. Romo, moose, aikman. Love it. It’s just a moral victory haha but a victory none the less. As for the players and the cba. They better just accept it. The billionaire owners can afford a lockout. Only the top 5-10% of nfl players could. The others aren’t smart enough. They’ll be broke in a few short months.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    2,320
    It's not a bad gig if you can get it...

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •