Sponsored Links |
|
Jeez you guys are really going hard on a trade idea TG11 proposed. A very unrealistic one af that. I’ll say it again It’s a moot point. Houston wouldn’t do that trade, and we are clear Rapschamp wouldn’t either. Let’s not beat a dead horse here
I have a different opinion than you. I see Banton, Precious, Champagnie as developmental pieces. Guys that will grow with the team over time organically like our current core did. But It never happened in year 1. This core is gonna need some help on the bench if they do want to make a playoff run in the short term. So forget Gordon but I would still like to make moves to improve on the bench if we can.
I dunno how we watch these games and you guys don’t see that our bench sinks us all the time, if our starters are playing out of there minds it’s always a tough game. And further when you see Boucher being the only consistent player off the bench I dunno how you would figure that another pf is what we need.
Cray
Oh my bad. I thought this was the rumour mill / trade ideas thread. Plebloemer is looking to the future, we should all refrain from discussing the thread topiceven you have to admit that is pretty coy
I listened to an hour long radio show on the raps today about the possibilities of Dragic and Boucher trades. They talked about Gorans brother Zoran saying that Dragic is just waiting on the TDL. And that Boucher is an attractive trade piece considering his bird rights. They talked about everything from trading them together, to separately, or keeping one or the other. Not like raptors nation aren’t talking about these things.
And again Im also a Rockets fan. Ofcourse I’m gonna look at that trade like it’s a no brainer for us because when I look at it from Houston’s stand points it’s actually laughable. If me thinking that was a dumb trade suggestion lead to this I dunno what to tell ya.
Last edited by smith&wesson; 01-19-2022 at 11:19 PM.
Sponsored Links |
|
Because I keep saying we need to secure the bench and make moves. And you say we’re looking toward the future and you prefer to stand pat. Ok but this is a trade ideas thread. Still don’t get it?
I’m good bro, I have no idea what we’re even debating. You’re looking toward the future that’s cool. What do you want me to say to that? Gods speed lol
Last edited by smith&wesson; 01-20-2022 at 12:20 AM.
Our team is starters + Boucher. Yes I believe we can use some pieces. I’ll continue to say it every game we lose because of our thin rotation and bench. Because it is what it is.
Why is the assumption that trade ideas can only be posted on this site if they help teams in the present?
Why can’t posters disagree with the ideas posted here if they think it isn’t good for the team?
I have also listed my own ideas for more long term approaches. That apparently doesn’t qualify as trade ideas?
What your post suggests is that people can only discuss trade ideas if it fits your proposed direction for the team. That is my issue. Is healthy disagreement not allowed?
Silly convo. Standing pat is a trade idea.
Smith is right - if we want to make a run this playoffs then we need another quality bench piece or 2.
But ultimately I agree that the best move is to plan for 2 years from now. Gordon doesnt fit that timeline. I like those shots and ball handling minutes going to siakam and Barnes.
Sponsored Links |
|