Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 44
  1. #16
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    [emoji288]
    Posts
    16,110
    Quote Originally Posted by ThomasTomasz View Post
    In half a season he's on his way to 4000 yards, has 13 TDs to 4 INTs and completing over 60% of his passes. On a cheap rookie contract. For teams looking for a QB, the Jaguars could get a nice haul in return for draft picks.
    I'd keep Minshew and see what Foles does this year and next year.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Annapolis MD
    Posts
    16,695
    Quote Originally Posted by QB_Eagles View Post
    I'd keep Minshew and see what Foles does this year and next year.
    You could do that too. An argument could be made that you shouldn't keep an asset like that on the roster but instead use it to improve other areas, but Foles and his injury history means that keeping Minshew would be a good move as well.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    19,743
    I think they have to start Foles and see how he fares in this offense.
    They have way too much money invested in him to not give him a chance as starter.
    Minshew's run has been awesome and I think he is a decent QB but you have to give Foles the edge, and I'm not even really a fan of him.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    1,339
    Might as well. He does well and you have 2 solid assets or he bombs and Minshew is waiting in the wings or he gets hurt again and Minshew is waiting in the wings. Jags don't really have much to lose by starting Foles.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    15,657
    You have to go back to Foles . 10-2 in the month of Nov or later . Just seemed like the right thing to do . They keep showing the throw he got hurt making Iím not sure I saw a better throw this year itís so good itís almost comical.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    979

    Jags bench Minshew for Foles

    Glad there going back with the Super Bowl 52 MVP


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Yankees, Eagles, Sixers, NYRangers



  7. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    19,402
    Update: Jags bench Foles for Minshew

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    57,045
    Quote Originally Posted by mgjohnson7851 View Post
    Update: Jags bench Foles for Minshew
    Doubt it lasts. Have you seen that Foles contract? Yikes.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    South Dakota
    Posts
    10,347
    Quote Originally Posted by warfelg View Post
    Doubt it lasts. Have you seen that Foles contract? Yikes.
    Yeah, they dug themselves in pretty good on that one....lotta money to keep him, lotta dead money not to....and little trade value w/o paying most of his salary.
    gotta love 'referential' treatment

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    309
    Wonder if Foles will be out in favor of young Gardner?!
    Ready for SB LIV!

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    12,925
    A terrible signing though Iím pretty sure most knew that before he got the big contract anyway.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    10,637
    Good for Foles.

    Donít know wtf the jags were thinking from the start.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    1,339
    Quote Originally Posted by ChongInc. View Post
    Good for Foles.

    Donít know wtf the jags were thinking from the start.
    Its the Jags, lol

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    South Dakota
    Posts
    10,347
    Quote Originally Posted by Mamba42 View Post
    A terrible signing though Iím pretty sure most knew that before he got the big contract anyway.
    Did they? Maybe it was a bit bigger than needed, given the market at the time....but it appeared a good signing otherwise, especially with his old coach Flip in house. And now people are assuming it's a bad signing based on the fact he's not looked good on a team that's not looked good all year....and a team that had gotten used to an offense transitioned to Moustache's strengths.

    So I don't know that I'd call it a bad signing as much as bad execution by the organization. And none of that even takes into consideration the fact that maybe they brought him back too soon from his injury.
    gotta love 'referential' treatment

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    85,254
    Quote Originally Posted by SiteWolf View Post
    Did they? Maybe it was a bit bigger than needed, given the market at the time....but it appeared a good signing otherwise, especially with his old coach Flip in house. And now people are assuming it's a bad signing based on the fact he's not looked good on a team that's not looked good all year....and a team that had gotten used to an offense transitioned to Moustache's strengths.

    So I don't know that I'd call it a bad signing as much as bad execution by the organization. And none of that even takes into consideration the fact that maybe they brought him back too soon from his injury.
    This guy gets it.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •