Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 17 of 25 FirstFirst ... 71516171819 ... LastLast
Results 241 to 255 of 363
  1. #241
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    31,172
    Quote Originally Posted by likemystylez View Post
    wrong- i am talking about the 3 that tied the game up in regulation and forced overtime.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjc3Cx0iR3w


    its someones cell phone video from the stands but it looks like there are 13.5 seconds left after his make..... and he was being guarded by alec burkes 1 on 1 for like 5 seconds straight.
    Yes, THAT 3 was in the last 30 seconds. Sorry. I think I would have called for a foul there.

    I will say that coaches often will call for not fouling when coming off a foul because they can get their defense set up and it's not in transition.

  2. #242
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    20,683
    Quote Originally Posted by Scoots View Post
    Yes, THAT 3 was in the last 30 seconds. Sorry. I think I would have called for a foul there.

    I will say that coaches often will call for not fouling when coming off a foul because they can get their defense set up and it's not in transition.
    i would not allow a 3 to go up- let alone a clean look

  3. #243
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    31,172
    Quote Originally Posted by likemystylez View Post
    i would not allow a 3 to go up- let alone a clean look
    Are you a player now? We don't know, but Kerr may have called for the foul and the players just failed to execute it. Oh well. Losing is the goal so I'm not going to get upset.

    Losses are never just one thing, it's a combination of the whole game to that point, we just tend to focus on the late events. Overall I think the team played well for who they are.

  4. #244
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    California, US
    Posts
    11,149
    Quote Originally Posted by likemystylez View Post
    wrong- i am talking about the 3 that tied the game up in regulation and forced overtime.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjc3Cx0iR3w

    its someones cell phone video from the stands but it looks like there are 13.5 seconds left after his make..... and he was being guarded by alec burkes 1 on 1 for like 5 seconds straight.
    Yea that was a bad move. Kerr admitted mistakes made throughout the game. I wouldíve bet $500 Lillard was going to hit that shot. I think you could him every time in that situation

  5. #245
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The Bay
    Posts
    14,996
    WCS to Dallas for a 2nd

  6. #246
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    31,172
    Quote Originally Posted by TrueFan420 View Post
    WCS to Dallas for a 2nd
    It would be nice to get more that JUST Dallas' 2nd. But he's not the future so not surprising.

  7. #247
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    20,683
    Quote Originally Posted by Scoots View Post
    It would be nice to get more that JUST Dallas' 2nd. But he's not the future so not surprising.
    would have been better to trade Looney. As you said scoots- looney is probably sitting out because we are tanking.... but if he went to dallas he might be the same guy he was last post season for us.

    Also looney isnt helping the warriors but WCS is so it would make sense to try to keep WCS and shed Looney's salary. Its weird- I havent even been hearing updates on Looney (but i kept hearing updates on green, robinson and evans).... Looney is just sitting for the sake of sitting now- LOl they dont even list reasons

  8. #248
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The Bay
    Posts
    14,996
    Quote Originally Posted by likemystylez View Post
    would have been better to trade Looney. As you said scoots- looney is probably sitting out because we are tanking.... but if he went to dallas he might be the same guy he was last post season for us.

    Also looney isnt helping the warriors but WCS is so it would make sense to try to keep WCS and shed Looney's salary. Its weird- I havent even been hearing updates on Looney (but i kept hearing updates on green, robinson and evans).... Looney is just sitting for the sake of sitting now- LOl they dont even list reasons
    Dallas wouldnít trade for a player thatís out injured. their making a playoff run and the starting center is out. WCS has a player option that he will exercise where as looney is locked in on two more years of a cheap deal

  9. #249
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The Bay
    Posts
    14,996
    Quote Originally Posted by Scoots View Post
    It would be nice to get more that JUST Dallas' 2nd. But he's not the future so not surprising.
    No doubt. Iím kinda bummed I liked his skillset but he was always likely a 1 year rental and then move for more money elsewhere. The 2nd is nice but this was a money deal.

  10. #250
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    31,172
    Quote Originally Posted by likemystylez View Post
    would have been better to trade Looney. As you said scoots- looney is probably sitting out because we are tanking.... but if he went to dallas he might be the same guy he was last post season for us.

    Also looney isnt helping the warriors but WCS is so it would make sense to try to keep WCS and shed Looney's salary. Its weird- I havent even been hearing updates on Looney (but i kept hearing updates on green, robinson and evans).... Looney is just sitting for the sake of sitting now- LOl they dont even list reasons
    I actually like Looney as a player MUCH more than WCS.

  11. #251
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    31,172
    Quote Originally Posted by TrueFan420 View Post
    No doubt. Iím kinda bummed I liked his skillset but he was always likely a 1 year rental and then move for more money elsewhere. The 2nd is nice but this was a money deal.
    Yeah, it's just that Dallas was kind of desperate ... I think Dallas has some other people's 2nds so maybe it's one of the earlier ones?

  12. #252
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    20,683
    Quote Originally Posted by TrueFan420 View Post
    Dallas wouldnít trade for a player thatís out injured. their making a playoff run and the starting center is out. WCS has a player option that he will exercise where as looney is locked in on two more years of a cheap deal
    but looney may never be able to consistently be on the floor again. Again there are no updates whatso ever on him- it almost appears as though the warriors have given up on him and are acting as though he isnt on the roster.

    also- even when he was playing this year.... he didnt look better than WCS

  13. #253
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    20,683
    Quote Originally Posted by Scoots View Post
    I actually like Looney as a player MUCH more than WCS.
    doesnt matter if he isnt out there playing though

  14. #254
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The Bay
    Posts
    14,996
    Quote Originally Posted by likemystylez View Post
    but looney may never be able to consistently be on the floor again. Again there are no updates whatso ever on him- it almost appears as though the warriors have given up on him and are acting as though he isnt on the roster.

    also- even when he was playing this year.... he didnt look better than WCS
    If you believe that then no team would trade for him and that should answer why not him.

    He started the year with a hammy injury and wasnít in game shape when the season started cause of it and it showed. Heís since been out injured. Doesnít mean all that much. We know who he is and what he is.

  15. #255
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The Bay
    Posts
    14,996
    Quote Originally Posted by Scoots View Post
    Yeah, it's just that Dallas was kind of desperate ... I think Dallas has some other people's 2nds so maybe it's one of the earlier ones?
    No doubt but he also has a player option and likely opts out for more money in the summer. Heís a rental and they know it. They wonít want to give up too much for that. We also had our own reasons for wanting to shed a player/salary.

Page 17 of 25 FirstFirst ... 71516171819 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •