Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 521 of 529 FirstFirst ... 21421471511519520521522523 ... LastLast
Results 7,801 to 7,815 of 7933
  1. #7801
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    3,269
    Quote Originally Posted by Wolfe-Raider View Post
    Darn it Meg, The House of Tudor which included Henry VII and VIII, Edward VI, Mary I and Elizabeth I ruled the Kingdom of England (+ Wales and the Lordship of Ireland) from 1485-1603. The Tudors would more than likely fall under the category of History rather than science. I am not sure how the Tudors did in the field of science, but I'd bet some of them were into astrology or maybe even had a passing interest in alchemy. LOL indeed.
    Henry VIII did create the Church of England thatís close to Astrology. You might be on to something!

  2. #7802
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    7,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Indy Raider View Post
    I would say that comment indicates that he thinks Carr is more like a Marino and less like a Dilfer.

    If I had to have a QB for 12 years and the choice was Marino or Dilfer I would take Marino... even if he has less super bowls.

    Iíd take Marino over Eli Manning even with Eli having 2.

    Iíd take Carr over Eli and Dilfer as well.

    Cart is somewhere between Eli Manning and Dan Marino... might end up being a better Marino when itís all said and done.

    Both are players with tools and skill sets that can compete at the highest level of the position, but neither that can solo carry a team with a bottom 10 defense year after year, and terrible WR options for his entire career.

    Iím 90% sure that this is just a long troll because there are a very small group of people who watch this sport and think Carr is a problem when talking about the Raiders.

    Most observant people who know the game can see a mismanaged, poorly drafted, and poorly coached/developed defense.
    LoL-Carr and Danny Marino do not belong in the same sentence.
    Last edited by Proximo; 07-31-2021 at 07:52 PM.

  3. #7803
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,545
    Quote Originally Posted by Proximo View Post
    LoL-Carr and Danny Marino do not belong in the same sentence.
    Yeah I like carr as much as most of the pro-carr guys, but ďcould end up a better Dan Marino?Ē Already way too late for that. Are we sure Indy isnít big brother David Carr?

  4. #7804
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Posts
    4,158
    Quote Originally Posted by LJ4ptplay View Post
    Yeah I like carr as much as most of the pro-carr guys, but ďcould end up a better Dan Marino?Ē Already way too late for that. Are we sure Indy isnít big brother David Carr?
    Dan Marino never won anything in Miami.

    Iím just using the anti carr logic.

    Although his appearance in Ace Ventura gives him a slight edge

  5. #7805
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    7,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Indy Raider View Post
    Dan Marino never won anything in Miami.

    Iím just using the anti carr logic.

    Although his appearance in Ace Ventura gives him a slight edge
    Danny Marino has .612 career winning percentage. He led his team to the Super Bowl and handed the Chicago Bears their only loss of the "85" season.

    Marino would dominate today-where as I can't see Carr staring down Buddy Ryan's 46 defense and ripping them a new one.

    That being said Derek probably owns the quickest release since Marino.

  6. #7806
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Posts
    4,158
    Quote Originally Posted by Proximo View Post
    Danny Marino has .612 career winning percentage. He led his team to the Super Bowl and handed the Chicago Bears their only loss of the "85" season.

    Marino would dominate today-where as I can't see Carr staring down Buddy Ryan's 46 defense and ripping them a new one.

    That being said Derek probably owns the quickest release since Marino.
    He never won the Super Bowl

    Regular season wins donít mean squat

    Iím being hyperbolic

    People ******** on carr are hopefully being the same

  7. #7807
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Raider Nation
    Posts
    16,233
    Quote Originally Posted by a60rdie View Post
    Henry VIII did create the Church of England thatís close to Astrology. You might be on to something!
    Haha. Not sure that is even close at all.

    "...prone to stoogery.".

  8. #7808
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Bakersfield, CA
    Posts
    2,408
    Quote Originally Posted by Megatron View Post
    Trent Dilfer won a Super Bowl. It doesnít mean he is a good qb. Lol

    So in your book Trent dilfer is a better qb than Dan Marino?
    Not at all. You're saying Carr is equal to Mahomes because of stats. I would take Dilfer over Carr. At least he had the nuts to stand in and try to make a play, unlike the coward we have.
    Last edited by cykoraider; 08-01-2021 at 12:00 PM.

  9. #7809
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Corona, Ca
    Posts
    19,051
    Quote Originally Posted by cykoraider View Post
    Not at all. You're saying Carr is equal to Mahomes because of stats. I would take Dilfer over Carr. At least he had the nuts to stand in and try to make a play, unlike the coward we have.
    I wouldnít take Dilfer over Carr and Iím not a Care fan. I couldíve won a Super Bowl with that Ravens defense.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  10. #7810
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Posts
    4,158
    Quote Originally Posted by KobeOwnSU View Post
    I wouldnít take Dilfer over Carr and Iím not a Care fan. I couldíve won a Super Bowl with that Ravens defense.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Which would make you better than Dan Marino in the grand scheme of things..!

  11. #7811
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    California
    Posts
    15,253
    Quote Originally Posted by cykoraider View Post
    Not at all. You're saying Carr is equal to Mahomes because of stats. I would take Dilfer over Carr. At least he had the nuts to stand in and try to make a play, unlike the coward we have.
    Lmao

    Dilfer over Carr.

    Am I reading that right? You are either a troll or you're just outright dumb
    Quote Originally Posted by Proximo View Post
    Carr may very well be the worst starting QB in Raiders history. Carr is like a root canal that takes 8 hrs. The Raiders have stuck with this bum going on 7 seasons! All they have to show for it is excuses. I hope Mariorta runs him out of training camp.
    Quote Originally Posted by Proximo View Post
    Sounds as though Mayock is waxing the Pinto and installing fake leather seat covers and chrome hubcaps before posting it on Craigslist.

  12. #7812
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    3,465
    Quote Originally Posted by LJ4ptplay View Post
    Yeah I like carr as much as most of the pro-carr guys, but ďcould end up a better Dan Marino?Ē Already way too late for that. Are we sure Indy isnít big brother David Carr?
    I like me some Carr. I think he will have a good year this year. But Marino is arguably the best ever. If Marino won one Super Bowl. He would probably be called the best.

  13. #7813
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    3,465
    Quote Originally Posted by cykoraider View Post
    Not at all. You're saying Carr is equal to Mahomes because of stats. I would take Dilfer over Carr. At least he had the nuts to stand in and try to make a play, unlike the coward we have.
    If you take dilfer over carr then you shouldnít be talking football. Lol

    He never had nuts. Did you watch any of those ravens games? He had the best d in history. You know reed, Suggs, goose, Lewis, etc etc. his job was to hand the ball off to Lewis.

    Your telling me dilfer was better? He threw for 135 yards a game!(carr 266). Averaged 5.5 yards a pass(carr 7.1). The year the ravens won the Super Bowl he threw 12 tds and 11 ints!!!! On what planet is that better than carr?????

  14. #7814
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    The Garden of Eden...New Jersey
    Posts
    16,347
    Carr hasnít shown he can lead us anywhere. Speculate all you like, but a guy who has proven he can do it under the right circumstances is far more appealing than a guy who hasnít proven anything.

    Stats donít mean much to me.

    -Stork

  15. #7815
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Bakersfield, CA
    Posts
    2,408
    Quote Originally Posted by Megatron View Post
    If you take dilfer over carr then you shouldnít be talking football. Lol

    He never had nuts. Did you watch any of those ravens games? He had the best d in history. You know reed, Suggs, goose, Lewis, etc etc. his job was to hand the ball off to Lewis.

    Your telling me dilfer was better? He threw for 135 yards a game!(carr 266). Averaged 5.5 yards a pass(carr 7.1). The year the ravens won the Super Bowl he threw 12 tds and 11 ints!!!! On what planet is that better than carr?????
    I'll take Lombardi's over stats all day long. Ask Marino if he wants to keep his stats or have Dilfer numbers and a ring, guess what his answer would be. Carr hasn't proven a thing to anyone. Participation awards have ruined sports, not sure how anyone is satisfied with stats and no wins. I'm still of the opinion that stats don't mean ****. Show me some playoff wins and change my mind. As of now, Carr hasn't shown anything. Blame the defense all you want but show me just one time, a defense was responsible for throwing the ball in the stands, sidelines or to the ground in fear of being hit. You will NEVER convince me with stats.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •