Additionally, throughout time the older generations have poked a little fun at the younger ones, still mentoring them and leaning on them later. You will end up doing the same.
Additionally, throughout time the older generations have poked a little fun at the younger ones, still mentoring them and leaning on them later. You will end up doing the same.
"...prone to stoogery.".
Sponsored Links |
|
Ok. Sounds good. I’m not going to derail this thread.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He was 26th
I think a better stat to look at would be who he did against their record.
But really, he’s also the most losing QB since his brother. So he wins meaningless games against meaningless teams in the 4th in losing seasons. Wake me up when he has comebacks in the playoffs.
Until then, he is what his record says he is, not the new excuse each year about WR, whatever defensive position we sucked at the year before, te, Rb, coaches etc... The excuses have run out, but enjoy average at best next year. I’m sure he will have a few comebacks and we will continue to be average.
Yeah. 26th. ALL TIME. After 7 years. With a team that has finished in the top half, defensively, once in his entire career.
I'll also leave these here, real quick...
^ Watson is elite. Carr is really good. Really good + good defense = enough for the playoffs, and anything can happen once you get to the proverbial dance.
"..And then the Raiders drafted the Knight in Shining Armor Prince Quarterback. Then they went on to win the Super Bowl. All the women in the kingdom cheered and they lived happily ever after...""
I've watched games from Raider history over the past few weeks: the first Gruden era, but also '09, '10 and '11, some of '13, etc.
The difference between Derek Carr and Jason Campbell is staggering. I don't want to return to the "Campbell era" style of offensive limitation if it can be avoided.
I'm a millennial and I can confirm we suck
Sponsored Links |
|
Yeah we do, but it’s about time to break the cycle, several teams a year do it and it doesn’t take eighteen goddamn years.
After all, this isn’t Cincinnati....
The Second protects the First, always has and always will...
"..And then the Raiders drafted the Knight in Shining Armor Prince Quarterback. Then they went on to win the Super Bowl. All the women in the kingdom cheered and they lived happily ever after...""
Funny thing is this year we seemed to play better against some good teams like KC and NO... then sucked against some bad teams.
I keep saying it... I dont mind carr. Just think an upgrade would’ve nice. Even if it’s not a huge upgrade. Sometimes you just have to shake things up to improve. Sure we could get worse too... but we know how this ends up.
But I do think that we’ll be much better next year. Even with Carr. I actually like some of our talent on defense, so I think that’ll improve. And I’m really hoping ruggs and Edwards can be close to the players I expected then to be. If we actually get to play in front of fans next year, the home field could really spark this team.
I agree in principle, but define 'upgrade.' The Raiders scored a lot of points on 2-minute drills and Carr runs the offense at the line: you can't "upgrade" unless the replacement can do all of that as well. Mariota did not audible at the line / adjust the play / run the offense.
Ultimately, I think the best course of action is to stick with Carr and spend on the defense.
Sponsored Links |
|