Man, I guess I struck a nerve
You know what’s funny about this? Your doctorate makes you no more qualified to debate sports than a meter maid or a police officer, or a housewife, or ____ (fill in the blank)
Your willingness to throw out your “doctorate” in an anonymous sports forum, however, is indicative of some pretty major character flaws potentially bordering mental health issues; narcissism, megalomania, perhaps a crippling superiority complex that causes you to lose debates because of a belief that your titles and degrees actually matter in arguments where they hold zero relevance?
Seriously though, I’m super happy that your graduate degree gives you a higher sense of self worth as you never fail to attempt shielding yourself with it...
It just holds no weight here. I mean, I could list my accomplishments and degrees too, but I won’t... because it’s pathetic...
I could tell you that I have 3 degrees relating to sports, business and physical health, but I won’t... I could tell you that I’ve sent 4 QB’s, 9 RBs, 8 WRs to the NFL combine in the last 3 years, but I won’t. I could tell you that I have undefeated records in Pop Warner, JC, and 6 years straight in my Fantasy Football league, but I won’t... because aside from the fact that none of this is true, it’s all absolutely irrelevant and - even if it were - it would still be pathetic to say aloud.
Now, if you will allow yourself to put aside the personal attacks against a stranger on the internet, then maybe we could have a productive debate.
Yes, I did (I guess your “doctorate” didn’t teach you that questions should end in a question mark, not whatever the **** you use a double ellipses for).
And I did it because their records are nearly identical over their first four years with Kyle being a little better in the regular season. And yes, Walsh won and SB in his 3rd season, Kyle lost one in his, but you can’t argue that Kyle should be fired because Anthony Lynn had a better *regular season* record without also acknowledging that Kyle has a better regular season record than Walsh did through 4 years. You don’t get to cherry pick arguments, Doc.
You also can’t say Walsh sucked simply because of his record through 4 seasons. I hate to break it you, but the same principle applies to Kyle. Context is everything and losing half of your team does matter.
Beathard, Mullens, and Hoyer are backup QBs. I’m not a JG guy, but when Kyle has him, he’s got a record of 22-8 (24-9 if you count the playoffs).
Give me a list of coaches who could lose their starting QB and not have a worse record as a result (and I don’t mean those who had the luxury of replacing their starter with another hall of famer like going from Montana to Young).
Wow, doc, doth mine eyes deceive me or is this the first reasonable argument you’ve made? Still, of course, rife with ad-hominem attacks, but I see you are incapable of presenting arguments devoid of such non-sense so I will just continue to ignore them and discuss the topics.
“Master choker” is probably going a bit far and I really couldn’t care less about losing with a 3rd string QB, 4th string RB, and a remaining ensemble consisting of largely second stringers in week 17 of a season where we had nothing to lose but draft position.
However, you may have a point here, doc, as he did fail to close out in the 2020 Super Bowl. But the reality is he’s still a young coach and if we don’t give him the slack to be able to fix the occasional lack of ability to close a game strong, then he likely irons those wrinkles out with another football team and wins his SBs elsewhere.
No, but he did give it to her real sweet-like.
I don’t know, is he? I would say yes, but I haven’t seen Saleh as a head coach.
Who would you replace Kyle with?
Never said you were a moron - and I wouldn’t do that... Though you should seriously consider talking with someone about those mental health concerns, doc.
The Bills met better teams each year, with the exception of the first year. They got stomped by a Redskins team that was 1st in points scored and 2nd in points allowed, then they ran into the first 2 years of the Cowboys dynasty. The only team they should’ve beaten was the Giants.
That was a very successful four year run. I mean, would you rather have 4 straight SB appearances, or zero SB appearances?
I hope you’re not suggesting replacing KS with Jimmy Johnson? Barry Switzer anyone?
