Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 74
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Lynwood , IL
    Posts
    46,939
    Wack


    https://twitter.com/wojespn/status/1...837838337?s=21


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Lynwood , IL
    Posts
    46,939
    https://twitter.com/warriorsworld/st...886571013?s=21


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Lynwood , IL
    Posts
    46,939

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Lynwood , IL
    Posts
    46,939
    https://twitter.com/wnbachicagosky/s...880554496?s=21


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  5. #35
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Mishawaka, IN
    Posts
    6,788

  6. #36
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Mishawaka, IN
    Posts
    6,788
    Starting PG: Tomas Satoransky

    Projections:
    12 PPG
    6 RPG
    7 APG
    1 3PG
    1 SPG
    48/40/80 %'s

    Starting SG: Zach Lavine

    Projections:
    26 PPG
    5 RPG
    5 APG
    2 3PG
    1 SPG
    47/38/83 %'s

    Starting SF: Otto Porter Jr.

    Projections:
    15 PPG
    6 RPG
    2 APG
    2 3PG
    1.5 SPG
    48/40/80 %'s

    Starting PF: Lauri Markkanen

    Projections:
    20 PPG
    10 RPG
    1.5 APG
    2.5 3PG
    .5 SPG
    .5 BPG
    45/38/85 %'s

    Starting C: Wendell Carter Jr.

    Projections:
    12 PPG
    10 RPG
    2 APG
    .5 3PG
    .5 SPG
    1.5 BPG
    50/30/80 %'s

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,584
    Quote Originally Posted by dabears34ft View Post
    Starting PG: Tomas Satoransky

    Projections:
    12 PPG
    6 RPG
    7 APG
    1 3PG
    1 SPG
    48/40/80 %'s

    Starting SG: Zach Lavine

    Projections:
    26 PPG
    5 RPG
    5 APG
    2 3PG
    1 SPG
    47/38/83 %'s

    Starting SF: Otto Porter Jr.

    Projections:
    15 PPG
    6 RPG
    2 APG
    2 3PG
    1.5 SPG
    48/40/80 %'s

    Starting PF: Lauri Markkanen

    Projections:
    20 PPG
    10 RPG
    1.5 APG
    2.5 3PG
    .5 SPG
    .5 BPG
    45/38/85 %'s

    Starting C: Wendell Carter Jr.

    Projections:
    12 PPG
    10 RPG
    2 APG
    .5 3PG
    .5 SPG
    1.5 BPG
    50/30/80 %'s
    Those projections look pretty solid. I want to say Lavine may go over them and Lauri might go under. I believe WCJ will be the difference in our overall team. If he’s an anchor on the defensive end without the fouls and puts up those numbers you projected on offense. We easily make the playoffs. If we’re healthy and Coby plays anywhere near like he did at unc. We’re a top 5 seed. I believe we can be better than Indy (without Dipo) Nets (without KD) Toronto and every other eastern team not named Phi, Bucks or Celtics.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    19,719
    Quote Originally Posted by fanatic View Post
    Those projections look pretty solid. I want to say Lavine may go over them and Lauri might go under. I believe WCJ will be the difference in our overall team. If he’s an anchor on the defensive end without the fouls and puts up those numbers you projected on offense. We easily make the playoffs. If we’re healthy and Coby plays anywhere near like he did at unc. We’re a top 5 seed. I believe we can be better than Indy (without Dipo) Nets (without KD) Toronto and every other eastern team not named Phi, Bucks or Celtics.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    This is the super optimistic take but alright.

    I do agree with LaVine possibly going over and Lauri possibly going under. Somewhat disappointing because Lauri needs to really step up. I don’t care if he only gets 8 boards per game. I’d like to see him scoring closer to 22-23.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Mishawaka, IN
    Posts
    6,788
    Quote Originally Posted by KG2TB View Post
    This is the super optimistic take but alright.

    I do agree with LaVine possibly going over and Lauri possibly going under. Somewhat disappointing because Lauri needs to really step up. I don’t care if he only gets 8 boards per game. I’d like to see him scoring closer to 22-23.
    I don't see Lauri regressing scoring wise. I think I was actually being pretty conservative there. I honestly think Lavine, Lauri, and Wendell increase their scoring this year. Sato's distribution looks legit. He was getting his scoring in the FIBA tournament, but you could see that he looks to find the easy basket for a teammate first. Sato is going to work wonders on the break with Lavine, and Porter and Lauri should get a boatload of open looks with his good court vision.


    As for Rebounds, he might regress because Wendell will be grabbing plenty himself. I still see both averaging near 10 boards a game. If Sato is our Starting PG, which it would be insane if he wasn't, I honestly see every starter +5 RPG.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Mishawaka, IN
    Posts
    6,788
    I think the beauty of our 3 role players in the projected starting rotation, (Sato/Porter/Wendell) is that none of them will hurt Lavine and Lauri's progression on offense. Sato being a pass first player, Porter barely needing the ball in his hands to be effective, and Wendell was an above average passer for a big in college. These 3 are the perfect group of efficient roll players to pair with 2 ball dominant scorers like Lauri and Lavine.

    I can't remember the last time we had a functional roster like this on paper. There was always something missing during the Rose era. Pre Rose injury, we never had the efficient shooters at SG to complement him. Add that with no deep threats at the 4 or 5, and we just had to ask Rose to do way too much. This starting unit won't have that problem. Leave Porter or Sato open from deep and they are going to bury it. Lauri could be one of the best stretch 4's in the league as soon as this year, and he started to develop a solid inside game before the fatigue ended his season. Wendell was only 19, and already showed some flashes of an above average to really good Center. Lavine is going to get his, and if teams double him up, we have 4 weapons around him to take the pressure off.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Lynwood , IL
    Posts
    46,939
    That scoreboard


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Lynwood , IL
    Posts
    46,939
    https://twitter.com/chisportupdates/...514716672?s=21


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  13. #43
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Mishawaka, IN
    Posts
    6,788
    Quote Originally Posted by Stunner View Post
    https://twitter.com/chisportupdates/...514716672?s=21


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
    Well no **** we couldn’t sign all 3. We had D Rose locked into a long term deal and he was the face of Chicago! We probably win it all if we get any of the 3. All filled huge needs.

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    9,066
    Quote Originally Posted by dabears34ft View Post
    Well no **** we couldn’t sign all 3. We had D Rose locked into a long term deal and he was the face of Chicago! We probably win it all if we get any of the 3. All filled huge needs.
    Rose was on his rookie contact. We had deng and Noah signed long term.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Lynwood , IL
    Posts
    46,939

    2019-20 Around the NBA

    deng contract was needed to be moved , he was good as gone to the clippers on draft night but they backed out . Noah didn’t sign his contract extension till after we missed on the big 3 . Taj didn’t sign a big deal till 2012, he was playing for a mill around that time .

    Only Bulls left over from the 09-10 team that were on the 10-11 Bulls were Rose , Taj , Deng and Noah .


    Noah was making between 2-3 million
    Taj between 1-1.5 mill
    Deng 11-13 million
    Rose was 5-5.5 million

    NBA salary cap in 2010 was 58.04 million tax level 69.92
    Last edited by Stunner; 09-19-2019 at 09:37 AM.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •