Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    From 303 to the 614
    Posts
    8,922

    Off Season Winners and Losers So Far

    The activity is dying down, as far as major moves go at least, so let's do a preliminary ranking of how we think teams have done so far this offseason. Feel free to rank teams in the order based on who you believe did better or worse, my rankings are in no particular order.

    Winners


    Clippers


    This team went from having ZERO all-stars to having two All-NBA players, while retaining their defensive bruisers and the reigning 6MOY.

    Lakers


    They got their guy, Anthony Davis, to pair with Lebron James in a timely fashion. While I'm not a big fan of the Cousins, they picked him up for a bargain, and more importantly they have finally signed a few 3pt shooters! (Danny Green, Caruso, Quinn Cook, kind of Bradley)

    New Orleans Pelicans


    Winning the lottery was a very nice consolation prize to losing their franchise piece and the Pelicans are taking it in stride. Pairing Hayes and Williamson through the draft will at the very least be amazing entertainment and highlight reel material. We will have to see how the Ingram recovers, but pairing Lonzo and Jrue is scary defensively, and adding JJ and Favors gives the young guys some much needed veteran depth.

    Losers


    Charlotte Hornets


    There was a part of me that was okay with the Hornets letting go of Kemba and blowing it all up due to the financial mess they've found themselves in...but the Terry Rozier signing is in contention for the worst move this offseason. If your plan is to rebuild why offer a bench player almost $20mill/yr?

    Washington Wizards


    Wow..........I mean I guess it's hard to have a successful offseason when you're burdened with the Wall contract but DAMN. Why draft Rui so high? Why trade for dudes who should be sitting at the end of other teams' benches? The Wizards seem to be following the recipe for a disgruntled NBA star with Beal.

    New York Knicks


    I didn't really want to include the Knicks, for similar reasons that I didn't want to include the Raptors, Warriors, or anyone who struck out on free agents. If a player doesn't want to go to your team in 2019, it might not be the FO's fault.....but (allegedly) not offering Kevin Durant a max contract when you've planned for this for YEARS is beyond me. Then going and paying three PFs a **** ton of money. They were shafted in the lottery, but still came out with a great piece when they could have botched that as well. But YET AGAIN the Knicks find themselves in a position where they can choose to invest in players or gamble on another multi year free agency plan to land a superstar.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    17,872
    Quote Originally Posted by cmellofan15 View Post
    The activity is dying down, as far as major moves go at least, so let's do a preliminary ranking of how we think teams have done so far this offseason. Feel free to rank teams in the order based on who you believe did better or worse, my rankings are in no particular order.

    Winners


    Clippers


    This team went from having ZERO all-stars to having two All-NBA players, while retaining their defensive bruisers and the reigning 6MOY.

    Lakers


    They got their guy, Anthony Davis, to pair with Lebron James in a timely fashion. While I'm not a big fan of the Cousins, they picked him up for a bargain, and more importantly they have finally signed a few 3pt shooters! (Danny Green, Caruso, Quinn Cook, kind of Bradley)

    New Orleans Pelicans


    Winning the lottery was a very nice consolation prize to losing their franchise piece and the Pelicans are taking it in stride. Pairing Hayes and Williamson through the draft will at the very least be amazing entertainment and highlight reel material. We will have to see how the Ingram recovers, but pairing Lonzo and Jrue is scary defensively, and adding JJ and Favors gives the young guys some much needed veteran depth.

    Losers


    Charlotte Hornets


    There was a part of me that was okay with the Hornets letting go of Kemba and blowing it all up due to the financial mess they've found themselves in...but the Terry Rozier signing is in contention for the worst move this offseason. If your plan is to rebuild why offer a bench player almost $20mill/yr?

    Washington Wizards


    Wow..........I mean I guess it's hard to have a successful offseason when you're burdened with the Wall contract but DAMN. Why draft Rui so high? Why trade for dudes who should be sitting at the end of other teams' benches? The Wizards seem to be following the recipe for a disgruntled NBA star with Beal.

    New York Knicks


    I didn't really want to include the Knicks, for similar reasons that I didn't want to include the Raptors, Warriors, or anyone who struck out on free agents. If a player doesn't want to go to your team in 2019, it might not be the FO's fault.....but (allegedly) not offering Kevin Durant a max contract when you've planned for this for YEARS is beyond me. Then going and paying three PFs a **** ton of money. They were shafted in the lottery, but still came out with a great piece when they could have botched that as well. But YET AGAIN the Knicks find themselves in a position where they can choose to invest in players or gamble on another multi year free agency plan to land a superstar.
    Are you kidding? Rui looks great so far.


    PAPI SMASH!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The 6
    Posts
    24,322
    Toronto - we lost Leonard 😪

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    15,279
    Winners:
    Okc: Nice job.
    Pels: Might have a brighter future than the team they made the trade with
    Worriers: They had a better record before KD. I expect that to be the same this time around because wins means everything
    Nets: I got a thread locked and multiple infractions a few years ago for posting a thread that the nets would have a brighter future than the knicks. I am right.


    Losers:
    clippers: Once Kawhi & PG leave in two years the Thunder will have an army chest of top 5 picks. It's a two year window with a coach that many question on here. This is like when they traded the umprotected pick that ended being #1 in the draft 5 times over

    The team that shall not be named. $360 m for two players not top 25 in the game as well as an aging. not so much upset about the C as he actually makes an impact in playoff games; but paying him close to 100 mill could backfire.

    Rockets: lol wtf you doing.

    Celts: 141 m for a pg while losing your best post player. Lets see how this pays off

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    532
    I've gotta think the Knicks as one of the biggest losers.

    Not bothering with a meeting with KD because of his injury you refused to offer max.

    Secondly cancelling the meeting with Kawhi because you thought his decision process would take too long.

    You open up 2 max slots then go after zero max players, nonsensical.

    Just think if you landed one or both of those guys, that's what the entire reason for the cap was.

    None of the 7 guys the signed are even fringe stars, the 2 they passed on meetings with are superstars. Idk, just disappointing to watch play out.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,705
    I am not a knick fan, but that bogus draft lottery reallyl hurt them.

    If they would have gotten the 1st or 2nd pick, and N.O wasn't granted a stimulus package
    (again Cp3 leaving and they get AD) by moving up and getting the number 1 pick, Knicks would have been in the position of power going into the draft.

    They could have made a trade for AD if they would have gotten the 2nd overall pick. AD ends up with the Knicks, this alone could have made KD talk to Kyrie and say we are heading to the Knicks.

    The League really F'ed over the Knicks, but they had their on agenda, by giving the top 2 picks to the lowest grossing companies, so they can have a young star player and create excitement among their fan base.

    Zion in N.O is a tragedy to me. Not saying that he isn't going to win and be happy their; because the League isn't going to make the sam mistake twice (Cp3 & AD leaving). It's just that those 4 teams that had the best chances to get the 1st overall pick; Knicks, Cav's Suns & Bulls, the Knicks & Suns could have really benefited from this.

    The Suns would have had 2 star headliners, Booker for the offense & Zion for the hustle and heart, and as Zion developed his game, then the Suns could have started to be serious contenders in the near future. Or the Suns could have gotten their pg, they needed in John Morant.

    The Bulls also would have had a good young core & we all know how Bulls fans get when they are actually good...smh

    The Cav's can just go & sit down some where.

    So I cannot give the Knicks a loser tag.







    Quote Originally Posted by IKnowHoops View Post
    As a rookie Micheal Beasley averaged 13.9pts per game on .472 shooting. Do you know how many times Kobe Bryant or Tracy Mcgrady shot at that percent or better? Never in there whole careers. If Beas can be what he was when he was a rookie (he won't hell be better) then the heat are coming away with another steal.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    8,008
    Winners
    Clippers-Easily the winners of the offseason. Adding Kawhi AND Paul George not only puts them in direct competition with the Lebron/AD Lakers, but it actually makes them the favorites. The Los Angeles Clippers, by all accounts, are the best team on paper and should be the favorites to win the NBA Championship in June.

    Lakers-Kawhi would have been the icing on the cake, but pairing AD with Lebron skyrockets the Lakers past most other teams alone. On top of that though, they put a pretty solid team around them considering most other free agents came off the board while they were waiting on Kawhi.

    Nets-Even though Kevin Durant won't play this season, getting Kyrie and Durant to sign legitimizes what the Nets have been building. Having Kyrie and DJ will make them better next year and whet their appetite for when KD debut's. Beating out the Knicks is just icing.

    Rockets-Just removing CP3's contract would have been a bit of a win for Houston, but moving CP3's contract to reunite Russell Westbrook with James Harden is fantastic. While both Harden/Westbrook are best with the ball in their hands, both are more than capable of distributing the basketball. I think this pairing will change how the Rockets play a bit, but improve their odds at contention for years to come.

    Pelicans-Getting what they got from the Lakers in the AD trade would have been enough to make them winners, but they were also gifted Zion Williamson by winning the lottery. Now the Pelicans have one of the highest ceilings in the NBA, and will likely be better next season than they were a year ago, when they still had AD on the roster.

    76ers-Getting Al Horford is an absolutely massive win the Philadelphia. Losing Butler hurts, and Josh Richardson won't produce anything close to what Butler did, but signing Al Horford along with getting Josh Richardson actually makes the 76ers better than they were last year. Philadelphia was a mess when Embiid went to the bench last year, their team stats tanked hard when Embiid was off the floor, but that should no longer be the case now that they have Horford. Ultimately for the 76ers to ever win they are going to have to rely on Simmons/Embiid to continue to improve, but basically turning Butler into Horford/Richardson makes them better.

    Jazz-They've really rounded out their team well by getting Conley and Bogdanovic. The difference between Conley and Rubio offensively is night and day. Conley is a solid shooter and should work very well with both Mitchell and Gobert while Bogdanovic gives them something they've lacked in recent years, real floor spacing. For years the Jazz have been starting both Favors/Gobert at PF/C, two players who play underneath the basket, instead of having a stretch 4 or 5. They won't be as long next year, but they should be a lot better offensively and remain strong defensively.

    Losers
    Raptors-Losing Kawhi kills their chances at championship contention for the foreseeable future. The saving grace for Toronto is we can't foresee very far in the NBA so who knows where they'll be in a few years, but for this off season they're losers. Them winning the championship makes the Kawhi trade worth it, but losing him in free agency still makes them losers. They still have a bright future, but you can't lose a player like Kawhi for nothing in the offseason and come out as anything but an offseason loser.

    Knicks-All their grandiose plans, once again, spectacularly blew up in their faces. They dreamed big about instantly creating a big 3 of Zion and 2 max free agents, they even traded Kristaps Porzingis to create the necessary cap. But not only did they miss out on Zion when they lost the lottery, they were so pathetically rejected by every superstar free agent (besides Kawhi) that they went ahead and cancelled the meeting with Kawhi knowing they had no shot. Their GM apologized to the fans while they used all their cap space on second and third rate free agents, instead acquiring future assets by taking on bad contracts. They come out of this offseason with RJ Barrett and a few role players. Considering they would have ended up with Barrett regardless of the Porzingis trade, they basically traded Porzingis for a guy they should have already drafted in DSJ, 2 first round picks (unprotected 2021 and top-10 protected 2023), and this free agency haul. They better hope Dallas sucks and Porzingis never fulfills his potential so those picks really turn into something. Otherwise, they lost Porzingis for a pipe dream.

    Hornets-Losing Kemba makes them the worst team in the NBA IMO. They are in a terrible cap situation and will probably resort to tanking for the next several years. Just a terribly ran franchise.

    Warriors-I think they landed on their feet quite nicely, but if I'm putting Toronto as a loser for losing Kawhi then I have to put the Warriors as losers for losing KD. Even though they did get D'Angelo Russell for Kevin Durant in a trade, rather than losing Durant for nothing, Russell isn't close to Durant and they also had to give up a future 1st round pick. Moving on from Iggy and Livingston were expected, but it closes the door on the Warriors as we knew them. These new Warriors are going to be a lot different from the champion Warriors of yesterday. Even though they'll still be good, they'll never be the same.

    Bucks-Losing Brogdon and Mirotic without replacements while some of your main competitors (Philadelphia, Brooklyn, Indiana) got better makes you a loser, especially when it's practically championship or bust for you next year. The Bucks could end up winning the title next year and still like losers for the offseason because they lost two really good players for no other reason than to keep a tax bill low. They saved money, but they'll likely be a worse team next year.

    Too early to tell
    Thunder-I know everyone wants to put them as winners because they turned Paul George, Russell Westbrook, and Jermi Grant into 8 1st round picks, 4 pick swaps, and SGA, but what are the odds that all those picks turn into players as good as either George or Westbrook? Those picks certainly won't be another Kevin Durant, James Harden, Russell Westbrook, and Serge Ibaka pairing. We have to see what fruit this rebuild yields before we can truly judge the Thunder, but we will always wonder what could have been with that franchise.
    Last edited by TylerSL; 07-16-2019 at 07:15 AM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    8,454
    It's weird that everyone went on about how big of a mistake giving Al Horford a huge contract is, but also give the 76ers a W and the Celtics an L.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    33,104
    Quote Originally Posted by IndyRealist View Post
    It's weird that everyone went on about how big of a mistake giving Al Horford a huge contract is, but also give the 76ers a W and the Celtics an L.
    There are different objectives at play. You can think that over the course of a deal Horford is bad value while also thinking that for this upcoming season he swings the balance of power in the East.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    15,279
    Quote Originally Posted by hugepatsfan View Post
    There are different objectives at play. You can think that over the course of a deal Horford is bad value while also thinking that for this upcoming season he swings the balance of power in the East.
    I think it's a good deal for the first 2 years and then awful the next 2. I guess it also helps that it gives them a legit post presence when Embiid sits or is injured which is something you have to take into account

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    532
    Quote Originally Posted by Giannis94 View Post
    I think it's a good deal for the first 2 years and then awful the next 2. I guess it also helps that it gives them a legit post presence when Embiid sits or is injured which is something you have to take into account
    I anticipate that's why they front loaded the contract and only gave him a partial guaraentee in year 4.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    55,303
    Quote Originally Posted by NBA all the way View Post
    I anticipate that's why they front loaded the contract and only gave him a partial guaraentee in year 4.
    Pretty much.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    28,695
    The Warriors have to be a winner for turning an empty roster spot in a not-going-to-play-this-year KD into an all-star. Frankly I think the re-made team is a lot more interesting than the team from the last couple years.

    The whole NBA is more interesting with all the chopping and changing. Only 4 players from the last 10 all-nba teams are still on their original rosters, and the all-star lists are even more changed. Player movement is at an all-time high, and next year is going to see more of the same. The NBA is being re-made yearly now and the fans are both winners and losers in that.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    532
    Quote Originally Posted by Scoots View Post
    The Warriors have to be a winner for turning an empty roster spot in a not-going-to-play-this-year KD into an all-star. Frankly I think the re-made team is a lot more interesting than the team from the last couple years.

    The whole NBA is more interesting with all the chopping and changing. Only 4 players from the last 10 all-nba teams are still on their original rosters, and the all-star lists are even more changed. Player movement is at an all-time high, and next year is going to see more of the same. The NBA is being re-made yearly now and the fans are both winners and losers in that.
    I doubt D-Lo ever makes another All-Star game out West, it's stacked with guards.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cool Ranch, NM
    Posts
    31,360
    The biggest winners of this offseason are the fans. This is gonna be a fun season.
    Quote Originally Posted by El Patito View Post
    Wow, you just won't let this go will you? I'd be more than happy to provide the numbers again if you'd like. The fact is that Marmol in his best season, put up one of the greatest performances by a reliever in the history of baseball. Better than Rivera? Youre damn right. You can't deny this.
    Marmolololololol

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •