Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 86
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,241
    It's interest at the 6 spot. Atlanta trade for the 4 pick and they might go for DeAndre Hunter and Cleveland might not be picking a PG so both White and Garland will fall to us. We might get a PG after all.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    8,611
    I was going to post in here before leaving for dinner that we should do everything possible to keep Roco while going for 4/Garland. Specifically Saric seemed like best option to me.

    AKA I like this trade, especially since it appears to set us up for Garland (or Coby).

  3. #33
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Highlands
    Posts
    1,471
    Unbelievably good trade for us, especially with it now looking like Atlanta will go for Hunter at 4.

    Garland or White is huge.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Maple Grove, MN
    Posts
    7,216
    I am going to laugh my *** off if we draft Hachimura at 6. On a serious note, I honestly like bother Garland and White. I think that if healthy, Garland may be a better pro, but White will likely be at least an average starting PG as well. There is also word that we may be targeting Culver. If that's the case, we probably have something in the works for creating space for Russell as well.
    Last edited by Oefarmy2005; 06-20-2019 at 07:38 PM.


    PSD Grammar Lesson #1:

    a) their - stands for "belonging to them"
    b) there - means "over there" as in location
    c) they're - short for "they are"

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Maple Grove, MN
    Posts
    7,216
    Garland is off the board, so they either are really bad at gauging where Garland would fall, or they are targeting Culver or White.


    PSD Grammar Lesson #1:

    a) their - stands for "belonging to them"
    b) there - means "over there" as in location
    c) they're - short for "they are"

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,241
    Might be like what you say above...Culver then Russell.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,241
    Wiggins might be a goner now.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Highlands
    Posts
    1,471
    Hahahahahahah we are seriously never going to be good, ever

  9. #39
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,226
    Quote Originally Posted by JeVo7 View Post
    Might be like what you say above...Culver then Russell.
    Would love to see that happen!

    We must have something brewing as 3 SG at this point. Hopefully We can move him and get something of quality back.... would love for it to happen tonight.. not likeley but would love it....

    As far as Culver I like it a bunch.... Was compared to Butler as a complete 2 way player. Needs to improve his 3pt shooting but getting a guy that plays both ways makes me happy.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Maple Grove, MN
    Posts
    7,216
    Quote Originally Posted by ellington19 View Post
    Hahahahahahah we are seriously never going to be good, ever
    I am not a fan of that pick either. You could have a similar impact player in the teens in this draft. I don't know much beyond that about Culver. Don't get me wrong. I am not necessarily low on him, but I just don't see the fit. Wiggins, RoCo, Okogie and now Culver are all very similar type of player(granted Wiggins just don't try at all).
    Last edited by Oefarmy2005; 06-20-2019 at 08:31 PM.


    PSD Grammar Lesson #1:

    a) their - stands for "belonging to them"
    b) there - means "over there" as in location
    c) they're - short for "they are"

  11. #41
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,226
    I know Towns has stated he really likes Russell. Not sure how we get the space though... this could be an interesting off season.... Somehow move Teague next week when he comes off the trade restriction. That would clear about 20 mil but not sure we get Russell for that... would be good with that but not sure if we could get it done. With all the wings we will be playing some small ball that is for sure....

  12. #42
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,226
    Reading a bit here and there .... seems like most thinks that we made this pick for someone else and there will be another move..... we shall see.

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,241
    Quote Originally Posted by Oefarmy2005 View Post
    I am not a fan of that pick either. You could have a similar impact player in the teens in this draft. I don't know much beyond that about Culver. Don't get me wrong. I am not necessarily low on him, but I just don't see the fit. Wiggins, RoCo, Okogie and now Culver are all very similar type of player(granted Wiggins just don't try at all).
    I'm not a fan of it either. His shooting just look to me like a role player? Like a spot up shooter. I think plan A was Garland, but he's gone and this is second option. I think we'll move Wiggins and go after Russell now.

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,241
    Quote Originally Posted by specialiststeve View Post
    I know Towns has stated he really likes Russell. Not sure how we get the space though... this could be an interesting off season.... Somehow move Teague next week when he comes off the trade restriction. That would clear about 20 mil but not sure we get Russell for that... would be good with that but not sure if we could get it done. With all the wings we will be playing some small ball that is for sure....
    Wiggins. Culver might be his replacement.

  15. #45
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,226
    Quote Originally Posted by JeVo7 View Post
    Wiggins. Culver might be his replacement.
    I think most would be good with that....

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •