Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 923 of 1310 FirstFirst ... 4238238739139219229239249259339731023 ... LastLast
Results 13,831 to 13,845 of 19644
  1. #13831
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    The Boogie Down
    Posts
    105,221

  2. #13832
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    11,981
    Quote Originally Posted by joeyc77 View Post
    I never said it was illegal. But it certainly changes the landscape to add additional SC justices. Like I said, I could care less about the SC. Just so long as you’re willing to accept this when Republicans do this as well.
    SJWs have convinced themselves that mass immigration means that elections will shortly cease to matter because we are on the brink of a one-party state. In other words you can't really reason logically with these people. They are a generation of man-children who think that electioneering is like playing democratic politics on your Sega Genesis with a Game Genie.

  3. #13833
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    37,052
    Quote Originally Posted by joeyc77 View Post
    Again, what the Republicans did was dirty. The democrats have been plenty dirty as well. Stacking the court is changing the landscape of our country and court system. So long as your fine with Republicans doing something similar, I’m fine with it.
    Yes, as mentioned I'm ok with the republican dirty move, they earned it. So same with dems.

    Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
    RAIDERS, SHARKS, WARRIORS

    "i don't believe in mysteries but still i pray for my sister, when speaking to the higher power that listens, to the lifeless vision of freedom everytime we're imprisoned, to the righteous victims of people of a higher position" - planet asia, old timer thoughts

    "God is Universal he is the Ruler Universal" - gangstarr (rip guru), robbin hood theory

    "don't gain the world and lose your soul, wisdom is better than silver and gold" - bob marley, zion train

  4. #13834
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    parts unknown
    Posts
    54,022
    Quote Originally Posted by flea View Post
    SJWs have convinced themselves that mass immigration means that elections will shortly cease to matter because we are on the brink of a one-party state. In other words you can't really reason logically with these people. They are a generation of man-children who think that electioneering is like playing democratic politics on your Sega Genesis with a Game Genie.
    How long can you go without saying SWJs?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Rep Power: 0




    Quote Originally Posted by Raps08-09 Champ View Post
    My dick is named 'Ewing'.

  5. #13835
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    13,278
    Quote Originally Posted by valade16 View Post
    And confirming Trump's SC Justice pick now certainly changes the landscape.



    More willing than Senate Republicans, which is pretty sad. I'd be willing to compromise and not increase the number of SC Justices on the SC if Republicans didn't confirm Amy to the Supreme Court.

    Would you be?
    Naming one SC justice doesn’t change the landscape. By comparison, it’s like Tom Brady “cheated” in football with the whole deflated balls thing. What he did was dirty but it didn’t change the landscape. This is similar to actions of both parties “dirty play.”

    Stacking the Supreme Court would be akin to changing the points awarded for a FG from 3 to 10 because you have the best kicker in the league.

  6. #13836
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    13,278
    Quote Originally Posted by nastynice View Post
    Yes, as mentioned I'm ok with the republican dirty move, they earned it. So same with dems.

    Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
    Both parties play dirty my dude...

  7. #13837
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    56,688
    Quote Originally Posted by ewing View Post
    How long can you go without saying SWJs?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Probably kinda similar to this:

    https://youtu.be/KLxhdPNXC_k

  8. #13838
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    11,981
    Quote Originally Posted by ewing View Post
    How long can you go without saying SWJs?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    What do you prefer I call you? Despite developing a negative connotation as a term on the internet, it is a perfectly accurate description of the quasi-religious political ideology that places 'social justice' at the center of all creation. Read any one of their gospel publications (like slate.com) and it is obvious what concerns these people, or at least what its dupes claim to be concerned with.

    Unfortunately they are a vocal, if relatively small, component of modern politics. If you prefer a different term because of being triggered feel free to substitute it in yourself. But like 'libertarian' or 'constitutionalist' it is merely a descriptor.

  9. #13839
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    37,916
    Quote Originally Posted by joeyc77 View Post
    Naming one SC justice doesn’t change the landscape. By comparison, it’s like Tom Brady “cheated” in football with the whole deflated balls thing. What he did was dirty but it didn’t change the landscape. This is similar to actions of both parties “dirty play.”

    Stacking the Supreme Court would be akin to changing the points awarded for a FG from 3 to 10 because you have the best kicker in the league.
    It’s going to change the landscape more than you’re saying, otherwise Republicans wouldn’t be so keen to do it.

    As for what’s “dirtier” who cares. If you play dirty, you don’t get to complain about how dirty the other side is. Dirty is dirty. If you don’t want the Dems to play dirty, don’t play dirty.

  10. #13840
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    parts unknown
    Posts
    54,022

    The 2020 Presidential Race

    Quote Originally Posted by flea View Post
    What do you prefer I call you? Despite developing a negative connotation as a term on the internet, it is a perfectly accurate description of the quasi-religious political ideology that places 'social justice' at the center of all creation. Read any one of their gospel publications (like slate.com) and it is obvious what concerns these people, or at least what its dupes claim to be concerned with.

    Unfortunately they are a vocal, if relatively small, component of modern politics. If you prefer a different term because of being triggered feel free to substitute it in yourself. But like 'libertarian' or 'constitutionalist' it is merely a descriptor.
    I’m Ewing. You seem obsessed with them is all. You need to diversify your material. Your starting to get like Special used to be with race issues


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Rep Power: 0




    Quote Originally Posted by Raps08-09 Champ View Post
    My dick is named 'Ewing'.

  11. #13841
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    37,052
    Quote Originally Posted by joeyc77 View Post
    Both parties play dirty my dude...
    I know that's what I'm saying.

    I opposed the right picking a judge because it was kinda dirty. But that's the way america is going.

    If the left tries to pack the court, I oppose that too. But that's the way america is going.

    You seem to be the one with a double standard, seemingly supporting one while opposing the other.

    Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
    RAIDERS, SHARKS, WARRIORS

    "i don't believe in mysteries but still i pray for my sister, when speaking to the higher power that listens, to the lifeless vision of freedom everytime we're imprisoned, to the righteous victims of people of a higher position" - planet asia, old timer thoughts

    "God is Universal he is the Ruler Universal" - gangstarr (rip guru), robbin hood theory

    "don't gain the world and lose your soul, wisdom is better than silver and gold" - bob marley, zion train

  12. #13842
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    America
    Posts
    96,528
    Let's get embedded tweets working again!

    https://forums.prosportsdaily.com/sh...5#post33780085

  13. #13843
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    56,688
    What a fool.

  14. #13844
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    America
    Posts
    96,528
    Quote Originally Posted by spliff(TONE) View Post
    What a fool.
    Can't even call it a dog whistle. People who aren't dogs aren't supposed to be able to hear that. But everyone can hear what he's saying and not specifically saying here.
    Let's get embedded tweets working again!

    https://forums.prosportsdaily.com/sh...5#post33780085

  15. #13845
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    America
    Posts
    96,528
    Let's get embedded tweets working again!

    https://forums.prosportsdaily.com/sh...5#post33780085

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •