Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 885 of 1203 FirstFirst ... 385785835875883884885886887895935985 ... LastLast
Results 13,261 to 13,275 of 18040
  1. #13261
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    8,114
    I don’t know why anyone is all up in arms about “buying” votes.

    Seriously, cut the idealism crap. Every vote is bought.

  2. #13262
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    South Dakota
    Posts
    14,922
    Quote Originally Posted by Crovash View Post
    Think Rip van Winkle style.
    I'd actually enjoy one o' those.............wake me when it's over
    gotta love 'referential' treatment

  3. #13263
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    America
    Posts
    95,029
    Director Wray points out there is no wide spread fraud. Mark Meadows calls him out for that factual claim. One of these two spoke under oath the other was Mark Meadows.

  4. #13264
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    53,888
    Quote Originally Posted by Kenny Powders View Post
    Time for a nap
    ....and a warm glass of milk.

  5. #13265
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Where the smog meets the shore
    Posts
    50,741
    Quote Originally Posted by Crovash View Post
    I don’t know why anyone is all up in arms about “buying” votes.

    Seriously, cut the idealism crap. Every vote is bought.
    Can I Venmo you for yours? What’s the price?

  6. #13266
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    36,269
    Quote Originally Posted by SpecialFNK View Post
    anything to support this or is this just your biased opinion.

    so much is wrong here, but the left wont care because it helps Democrats win.

    if someone was using their money to help buy Trump votes the same people would be losing their ****.

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/o...f-black-felons
    Common sense.

  7. #13267
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    36,269
    Quote Originally Posted by Sluggo1 View Post
    Are you kidding with this one???

    Naivete to a new level.

    FYI…I hate the phrase "can of worms." Every time I see it I can't get the vision of a "can of worms" out of my head. You just ruined my whole day.
    I think Trump demanding his name be put on the stimulus checks that went to everyone is more of an attempt to buy people's votes than Bloomberg paying the unjust fines imposed to preclude them from voting.

  8. #13268
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    South Dakota
    Posts
    14,922
    what's funny with those stim checks too is....the majority of people never got a check, if they got money it was direct deposited
    gotta love 'referential' treatment

  9. #13269
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    36,269
    Quote Originally Posted by SiteWolf View Post
    what's funny with those stim checks too is....the majority of people never got a check, if they got money it was direct deposited
    Be sure to thank the Donald anyway.

  10. #13270
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    8,114
    Quote Originally Posted by GGGGG-Men View Post
    Can I Venmo you for yours? What’s the price?
    I’m cool. It’s free for the asking.

  11. #13271
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    6,842
    Quote Originally Posted by valade16 View Post
    I think Trump demanding his name be put on the stimulus checks that went to everyone is more of an attempt to buy people's votes than Bloomberg paying the unjust fines imposed to preclude them from voting.
    OK good.

    You're right.

    Now take a little nap before supper.

  12. #13272
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    6,842
    Quote Originally Posted by Crovash View Post
    Think Rip van Winkle style.
    Or RBG style.

  13. #13273
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    36,269
    Quote Originally Posted by Sluggo1 View Post
    OK good.

    You're right.

    Now take a little nap before supper.
    Somebody already beat you to the nap joke today. Your jokes, much like you, are old.

  14. #13274
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    53,888
    The Election That Could Break America: If the vote is close, Donald Trump could easily throw the election into chaos and subvert the result. Who will stop him?

    If we are lucky, this fraught and dysfunctional election cycle will reach a conventional stopping point in time to meet crucial deadlines in December and January. The contest will be decided with sufficient authority that the losing candidate will be forced to yield. Collectively we will have made our choice—a messy one, no doubt, but clear enough to arm the president-elect with a mandate to govern.

    As a nation, we have never failed to clear that bar. But in this election year of plague and recession and catastrophized politics, the mechanisms of decision are at meaningful risk of breaking down. Close students of election law and procedure are warning that conditions are ripe for a constitutional crisis that would leave the nation without an authoritative result. We have no fail-safe against that calamity. Thus the blinking red lights.

    “We could well see a protracted postelection struggle in the courts and the streets if the results are close,” says Richard L. Hasen, a professor at the UC Irvine School of Law and the author of a recent book called Election Meltdown. “The kind of election meltdown we could see would be much worse than 2000’s Bush v. Gore case.”

    A lot of people, including Joe Biden, the Democratic Party nominee, have misconceived the nature of the threat. They frame it as a concern, unthinkable for presidents past, that Trump might refuse to vacate the Oval Office if he loses. They generally conclude, as Biden has, that in that event the proper authorities “will escort him from the White House with great dispatch.”

    The worst case, however, is not that Trump rejects the election outcome. The worst case is that he uses his power to prevent a decisive outcome against him. If Trump sheds all restraint, and if his Republican allies play the parts he assigns them, he could obstruct the emergence of a legally unambiguous victory for Biden in the Electoral College and then in Congress. He could prevent the formation of consensus about whether there is any outcome at all. He could seize on that uncertainty to hold on to power.

    Trump’s state and national legal teams are already laying the groundwork for postelection maneuvers that would circumvent the results of the vote count in battleground states. Ambiguities in the Constitution and logic bombs in the Electoral Count Act make it possible to extend the dispute all the way to Inauguration Day, which would bring the nation to a precipice. The Twentieth Amendment is crystal clear that the president’s term in office “shall end” at noon on January 20, but two men could show up to be sworn in. One of them would arrive with all the tools and power of the presidency already in hand.
    https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine...oncede/616424/

    Eye opening article with way more info than the little blurb I provided.

  15. #13275
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    6,842
    Quote Originally Posted by valade16 View Post
    Somebody already beat you to the nap joke today. Your jokes, much like you, are old.
    You keep bringing up the age thing as if it's an insult. Believe me, it isn't.

    Age usually shows a clearer understanding of simple things as I have often demonstrated. So this clearer thinking should come to some of you with age. Of course, some of you may have to live to be seven hundred or so but I can't help that.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •