The 2020 Presidential Race

[SiteWolf]

I don't suppose that I have to point out that this ticket is constitutionally not allowed?

Ilhan Omar is not a natural born citizen and without a modification to the Constitution, she would not be allowed to run for president or vice president.

eh, well I was unaware and just adding to a point

[flips333]

Well I’m going with what I’ve read and listened to from Disease specialists. Mike Osterholm is one of the best minds behind Fauci on this and he referred to this. It’s true we don’t KNOW, but as you said we go off the latest studies and findings.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm pretty sure they are getting their info from that paper I just linked. We won't really know the answer for a few more months. So for the time being the cautious approach is to tell people not to assume immunity post-virus.

[flips333]

I believe this is when the kids say “ok boomer”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

yup.

[SiteWolf]

I'm pretty sure they are getting their info from that paper I just linked. We won't really know the answer for a few more months. So for the time being the cautious approach is to tell people not to assume immunity post-virus.

So why are they persuading recovered COVID patients to donate blood for their antibodies?
I thought the issue was less about being immune and more about for how long.

[Sluggo1]

I believe this is when the kids say “ok boomer”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If these are the kids that are out there "peacefully protesting" and don't really vote anyway…who really cares what they say???

It's not like they actually contribute anything.

[GGGGG-Men]

Those caring for the elderly and high risk would have to be in the same 'bubble'...unless you're expecting the high risk to care for the elderly and the high risk fend for themselves.

Caring for elderly would put you in high risk category. At least that’s how my state and employer deem it. Basically anyone over 65 or caring for elderly is high risk and asked to not even make occasional office visits. Which is moot because we’re remote through the end of the year but that’s besides the point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[GGGGG-Men]

I'm pretty sure they are getting their info from that paper I just linked. We won't really know the answer for a few more months. So for the time being the cautious approach is to tell people not to assume immunity post-virus.

Yeah. We have a hysterical public that demands info NOW NOW NOW and they happen to be scientifically illiterate. Not understanding that we will always know more tomorrow about anything than we do today should be a basic concept to grasp.

Why do they keep changing their minds!! It’s a conspiracy against trump! That’s the only rationale explanation!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Crovash]

Those caring for the elderly and high risk would have to be in the same 'bubble'...unless you're expecting the high risk to care for the elderly and the high risk fend for themselves.

Going by the statistics that this scenario is founded upon (not a scenario I necessarily agree with, mind you) you simply do what you do with the teachers and other high-risk occupations: replace all personnel over 60 and all who balk, and let the rest lead the way the herd immunity. Yes, most of the rest will get infected and some will die, but let it be said that in love and war, nothing worthwhile comes easily.

Meanwhile, you encourage — or mandate — old people to stay away if they fear the consequences.

[cabernetluver]

Oh
My
God


You’re back?!?!?

What’s the PSD equivalent of a hug?

I’ve missed you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thank you so much.

[cabernetluver]

Welcome back. This place is great and wonderful and smart and cool. You won't regret this decision to log in again!

Thank you!

[cabernetluver]

CAB!

This site’s collective IQ just climbed into the triple digits.

I am not at all sure that would meet with universal agreement, but thank you!

[spliff(TONE)]

In about two years (maybe sooner) we will have our first female president. So check that box.

Then we will still need to to have our first elected female president. Possibly in 2024.

Then, I guess, we'll need a gay prez. Will that finish checking all the boxes??? Hope so.

Woah! What an edgy post, Slugster!

[GGGGG-Men]

Now we just need the return of PatsFan and SmthBluCitrus!

....and natepro for **** talking entertainment.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Zmaster52]

In about two years (maybe sooner) we will have our first female president. So check that box.

Then we will still need to to have our first elected female president. Possibly in 2024.

Then, I guess, we'll need a gay prez. Will that finish checking all the boxes??? Hope so.

Don’t worry Sluggo, I’ll make it my personal journey to get a South Asian or Arab man into office.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Zmaster52]

One would have to assume the Dems had to consider whomever the VP pick now as someone they would be comfortable in running in 2024....given Joe would be 82 (and has he already said he'd be a one term president anyway?)

For all we know, we had a gay president years ago. But I know what you mean. That AOC/Omar ticket in 2032 will be interesting.

If AOC stays doing what she’s been doing, I would happily vote for her, her VP would be irrelevant.

I see her going for a 2028 or 2032 run.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk