Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

[metswon69]

and had they gotten to her then she would have been in danger.
AOC gets death threats, so she will always be in danger of some psycho that wants to hurt her.

many people in politics have gotten death threats, including Trump. I guess he too was always in danger.

When has Trump had people directly outside the WH looking to break in? The Secret Service doesn't let you within a large parameter of the building and on top of that its fenced off. Its arguably the most secure spot in the whole world.

[valade16]

If someone shoots at you, you are not in danger until the bullet gets to you.

[Webslinger]

If someone shoots at you, you are not in danger until the bullet gets to you.

Right, you're completely safe up until then. This is the dumbest argument anyone can come up with.

[nastynice]

Just agree to disagree. What else is there..?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[blams]

Just agree to disagree. What else is there..?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Saying that is being tolerant to ignorance.

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

[nastynice]

Saying that is being tolerant to ignorance.

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

I mean on the right stage sure, but for us on an internet forum, that's pretty much the end of the road right there, isnt it?

He gives his reasoning, you either buy it or you dont. I rarely do.


Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[nastynice]

The person whose reasoning I'm really curious about is this guy right here.

I'm blushing.

Dbroncmo. I'm curious about your take, and your reasoning/basis of said take, on the fraud election story.

We'll all be waiting to.rip you, no doubt, but 1) you got thick skin, 2) if you're confident in your reasoning, then what could we rip on?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[spliff(TONE)]

I mean on the right stage sure, but for us on an internet forum, that's pretty much the end of the road right there, isnt it?

He gives his reasoning, you either buy it or you dont. I rarely do.


Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Funny stuff coming from you.

[spliff(TONE)]

The person whose reasoning I'm really curious about is this guy right here.



Dbroncmo. I'm curious about your take, and your reasoning/basis of said take, on the fraud election story.

We'll all be waiting to.rip you, no doubt, but 1) you got thick skin, 2) if you're confident in your reasoning, then what could we rip on?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

1) no, he doesn't

2) he's obviously not confident in his reasoning, as he's basically been quiet as a church mouse on anything election related post Election Day and gets really touchy when anyone directly broaches the subject with him (WHAT IS THERE TO DISCUSS?!?!?)

[SpecialFNK]

Right, you're completely safe up until then. This is the dumbest argument anyone can come up with.

which is why nobody made that comparison.

[spliff(TONE)]

Sick recovery!

[WES445]

Saying that is being tolerant to ignorance.

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

Learn to live with it cause it will never go away. We cling to it too hard.

[brett05]

You silly person, you are in a predominately Democrat forum. You expect us to defend Cruz over AOC, who we hate more and longer than Trump? To agree with you, a Canadian Trumptster? When has anybody agree with you, but let you keep trying and expecting a different result each time. Cuckoo for Trump.

At least you admit you are as close minded as a concrete fill for a former doorway. That's something.

[brett05]

why does that matter.

For those on a republican/trump dominated forum does that make anything they say about trump true? Of course not.

We should still be able to have honesty, bipartisan conversation.

qft

[brett05]

When will Trump apologize for inciting a riot to overthrow our democracy?

Right after he....well ya know..incites a riot.