Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

[Bramaca]

I've provided the purpose, again today. she was fine for being scared, for feeling that way. that is how she felt. but how she felt do3esn't mean she was actually in danger the way everything happened.

And what does that change?

[rhino17]

awesome. so answer this question with facts, was AOC in the Capitol building, or her office?

You can read the transcript of what she said yourself. I can't do that for you.

[SpecialFNK]

You can read the transcript of what she said yourself. I can't do that for you.

yes I can, I know what she said. like almost being murdered in her own tweet, which did not happen.

one should be able to answer what I asked, but those that don't want to accept the truth don't want to.

[SpecialFNK]

And what does that change?

what do you mean.

either she was scare or she wasn't. she was, and that's fine.

either she was in danger, or she wasn't. based on where she was and where the rioting was, she wasn't in immediate danger.

that is that part, separate from her talking about being almost murdered, when that was not reality.

[Pierzynski4Prez]

Just reposting this.

[Scoots]

By some of your logic on AOC not being in the Capitol Building, people evacuating NYC in buildings that weren’t hit by planes on 9/11 were a bunch of overexaggerating wimps.

And that there were unknown hundreds of planes out there coming, and you were another tower.

[Scoots]

what do you mean.

either she was scare or she wasn't. she was, and that's fine.

either she was in danger, or she wasn't. based on where she was and where the rioting was, she wasn't in immediate danger.

that is that part, separate from her talking about being almost murdered, when that was not reality.

What she experienced meets the standards for feeling in imminent danger.

I think you are just arguing to argue and I hope you don't actually care about any of this useless BS.

[Pierzynski4Prez]

What she experienced meets the standards for feeling in imminent danger.

I think you are just arguing to argue and I hope you don't actually care about any of this useless BS.

I'm wondering where this outrage was for the hundreds/thousands of lies told by dear old Trump for 4 years.

[ewing]

this has been a point I've said, and now in the last few days that is 3 people that said the same thing.

You are also being extremely dramatic about it and posting a bunch of other total nonsense


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[rhino17]

yes I can, I know what she said. like almost being murdered in her own tweet, which did not happen.

one should be able to answer what I asked, but those that don't want to accept the truth don't want to.

[WES445]

This is coming from a Trumpster.

[WES445]

Basically, he wants us to focus on criticizing Dems 24/7 while giving Trump, Cruz, and Mitch a pass or a mild rebuke. Once again, you are in a democrat dominated forum. He supported, from Canada, the biggest liar in American history politic and now preaching to us about truth and honesty.

[valade16]

Where did I say it was the only statement I made?

Losers in debates have two tell tale signs.
1) They don't admit being wrong
2) They love illegal debate tactics and quickly shift to ad hominem

Then stop doing 1) And 2)

Also, you saying it’s a debate is agreeing you believe she is lying considering my position is she wasn’t, so how can you be debating against that if you don’t have an opinion ?

[brett05]

It's as if you wrote the book on how to deflect when losing a debate.

too much time with the likes of you to not document it for others not to fall into your footsteps.

[valade16]

If only that was said during the events not nearly a month after.

Here’s another one of your statements where your mind totally isn’t made up...