Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 342 of 349 FirstFirst ... 242292332340341342343344 ... LastLast
Results 5,116 to 5,130 of 5233
  1. #5116
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Flock of Sheep No.97 near BAAA BAA lane
    Posts
    12,140
    Are you the PSD Dr. Phil? Sluggo was the one who belittle his post with his zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz remark
    WE STILL KNOW WHERE THE PITCHFORKS ARE:Beau of the Fifth Column, you tube.

  2. #5117
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    10,700
    Quote Originally Posted by Scoots View Post
    Why not just answer his question instead of insulting him and blaming him for it?
    Were you following this at all?

    Sluggo misrepresented what AOC was saying. Crovash clearly pointed that out. Sluggo responded by ignoring reality and everything just said to run with the same ridiculous lies/misrepresentation about AOC again. Crovash then notes he clearly isn't listening to what AOC said again as it is misrepresented and sluggo responds with zzzzzzzzzz. The question you are telling him to answer is a misrepresentation of what was actually said/irrelevent in any way.

  3. #5118
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    33,874
    Quote Originally Posted by mngopher35 View Post
    Were you following this at all?

    Sluggo misrepresented what AOC was saying. Crovash clearly pointed that out. Sluggo responded by ignoring reality and everything just said to run with the same ridiculous lies/misrepresentation about AOC again. Crovash then notes he clearly isn't listening to what AOC said again as it is misrepresented and sluggo responds with zzzzzzzzzz.
    Okay. I didn't go that far back I guess. Still, I'd rather a repetitive answer over an insult. But I understand Sluggo Sloggoing getting that response.

  4. #5119
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    10,700
    Quote Originally Posted by Scoots View Post
    Okay. I didn't go that far back I guess. Still, I'd rather a repetitive answer over an insult. But I understand Sluggo Sloggoing getting that response.
    I have no idea what "insult" you mean? Was it really anything different than anyone else posts?

    Also if the entire issue is Sluggo choosing to be ignorant on this/posting in that way doesn't what he described actually fit what happened? He ignored reality and what was said to misrepresent AOC and when confronted he ignored that (put his head in the sand). I think it is pathetic when people ignore what is actually happening to call someone else out without actual context.

  5. #5120
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    50,693
    Quote Originally Posted by mngopher35 View Post
    Were you following this at all?

    Sluggo misrepresented what AOC was saying. Crovash clearly pointed that out. Sluggo responded by ignoring reality and everything just said to run with the same ridiculous lies/misrepresentation about AOC again. Crovash then notes he clearly isn't listening to what AOC said again as it is misrepresented and sluggo responds with zzzzzzzzzz. The question you are telling him to answer is a misrepresentation of what was actually said/irrelevent in any way.
    Scoots to the rescue!

    PSD: where the moderators consistently cave to crybaby tattletales and it's a lot safer to be openly racist, hateful, and ignorant than to be a little rude to the racist, hateful, and ignorant

  6. #5121
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    6,152
    Quote Originally Posted by Crovash View Post
    Obviously you did not know what she said or you chose to ignore it.
    This is what SHE SAID.

    This is a pattern of an attitude towards women and the dehumanization of others.

    This was taken from a transcript of her speech.

    All I asked was to explain this "attitude." Since I don't think she would take my call and you seem to agree with what she said, I thought you ight be willing to explain what this "attitude" is.

    Either you can explain what this "attitude" is or you can't (or won't). Can anyone else explain this "attitude?"

    And I agreed that it was a good speech ad that Yoho was wrong.

  7. #5122
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    6,152
    Quote Originally Posted by mngopher35 View Post
    Were you following this at all?

    Sluggo misrepresented what AOC was saying. Crovash clearly pointed that out. Sluggo responded by ignoring reality and everything just said to run with the same ridiculous lies/misrepresentation about AOC again. Crovash then notes he clearly isn't listening to what AOC said again as it is misrepresented and sluggo responds with zzzzzzzzzz. The question you are telling him to answer is a misrepresentation of what was actually said/irrelevent in any way.
    Whwere, in thos portion of the thread, did I bring up……the same ridiculous lies/misrepresentation about AOC again???

  8. #5123
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    born and raised on the south side of Chicago.
    Posts
    15,097
    Quote Originally Posted by Sluggo1 View Post
    This is what SHE SAID.

    This is a pattern of an attitude towards women and the dehumanization of others.

    This was taken from a transcript of her speech.

    All I asked was to explain this "attitude." Since I don't think she would take my call and you seem to agree with what she said, I thought you ight be willing to explain what this "attitude" is.

    Either you can explain what this "attitude" is or you can't (or won't). Can anyone else explain this "attitude?"

    And I agreed that it was a good speech ad that Yoho was wrong.
    Well let's just take this as the point the conversation that conversation can end. Whatever conceptions occured before I think you have made yourself clear here.

    I do think there is an attitude towards women. Again, as you stated language matters. Culturally there is no problem referring to any woman, and especially any woman who stands up for what she believes or what she wants as a dog. We have a word for this when men do it... assertive.

    Quote Originally Posted by MrPoon
    man with hair like fire can destroy souls with a twitch of his thighs.

  9. #5124
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    7,379
    The pattern is established by all of the examples she gave prior to that statement.

    If you listened to the entire speech carefully there would have been no question what she said, what she used as evidence, and what she meant.

    I sure as hell don’t need to paraphrase it for you.

  10. #5125
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    6,152
    Quote Originally Posted by Crovash View Post
    The pattern is established by all of the examples she gave prior to that statement.

    If you listened to the entire speech carefully there would have been no question what she said, what she used as evidence, and what she meant.

    I sure as hell don’t need to paraphrase it for you.
    So you don't know what this attitude is???

  11. #5126
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    10,700
    Quote Originally Posted by Sluggo1 View Post
    Whwere, in thos portion of the thread, did I bring up……the same ridiculous lies/misrepresentation about AOC again???
    Where you talk about it being the general approach of men. She gave examples of multiple men doing it very clearly and going over clearly what yoho did.

    She gave examples of just a general violent/dehumanizing culture. She went over other politicians using "dehumanizing" language towards others (including woman).

    If you listened to what she said it was not how you portrayed it.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  12. #5127
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    6,152
    Quote Originally Posted by mngopher35 View Post
    Where you talk about it being the general approach of men. She gave examples of multiple men doing it very clearly and going over clearly what yoho did.

    She gave examples of just a general violent/dehumanizing culture. She went over other politicians using "dehumanizing" language towards others (including woman).

    If you listened to what she said it was not how you portrayed it.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    It's a tough world out there. Politics, like many things, are not all huggy feely. They probably cuss and insult each other all the time. Are we supposed to treat women differently??? When people like Tlaib refer to the POTUS as an MFer, doesn't that bring women to the same level as the men??? (Did she ever apologize?…I may have missed that.)

    There are 500+ congressionals plus several thousand staffers. I'm saure things get pretty colorful from time to time.

  13. #5128
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    6,152
    Quote Originally Posted by mngopher35 View Post
    Where you talk about it being the general approach of men. She gave examples of multiple men doing it very clearly and going over clearly what yoho did.

    She gave examples of just a general violent/dehumanizing culture. She went over other politicians using "dehumanizing" language towards others (including woman).

    If you listened to what she said it was not how you portrayed it.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    It's a tough world out there. Politics, like many things, are not all huggy feely. Congressionals probably cuss and insult each other all the time. Are we supposed to treat women differently??? When people like Tlaib refer to the POTUS as an MFer, doesn't that bring women to the same level as the men??? (Did she ever apologize?…I may have missed that.)

    There are 500+ congressionals plus several thousand staffers. I'm sure things get pretty colorful from time to time.

  14. #5129
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    10,700
    Quote Originally Posted by Sluggo1 View Post
    It's a tough world out there. Politics, like many things, are not all huggy feely. They probably cuss and insult each other all the time. Are we supposed to treat women differently??? When people like Tlaib refer to the POTUS as an MFer, doesn't that bring women to the same level as the men??? (Did she ever apologize?…I may have missed that.)

    There are 500+ congressionals plus several thousand staffers. I'm saure things get pretty colorful from time to time.
    Some people murder others. Doesn't mean murder is acceptable. I agree it probably does happen tons with people like yoho or a potus like trump it probably happens way way way more often than it should given what they do on camera let alone off.

    What yoho did should be called out, of course you are more focused on aoc and defending him with "others do it too".

    You rant non stop when Omar or aoc or tlaib say anything you don't like just like this post and multiple others now bringing this same instance up. If that's bad and worth doing then why do you have different standards when yoho/trump or others say bad things?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  15. #5130
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    6,152
    Quote Originally Posted by mngopher35 View Post
    Some people murder others. Doesn't mean murder is acceptable. I agree it probably does happen tons with people like yoho or a potus like trump it probably happens way way way more often than it should given what they do on camera let alone off.

    What yoho did should be called out, of course you are more focused on aoc and defending him with "others do it too".

    You rant non stop when Omar or aoc or tlaib say anything you don't like just like this post and multiple others now bringing this same instance up. If that's bad and worth doing then why do you have different standards when yoho/trump or others say bad things?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Bolded 1…stupid point. Actually ridiculous.

    Bolded 2…totally agree

    Bolded 3…completely wrong, I'm not defending him. AOC used the term "attitude towards women" and I was wondering what she meant by that. In congress (or anywhere) is there an attitude toward women and a different attitude toward men? Is that what we want? If so, does that make female congressionals more powerful than males because we have to treat them differently. I thought they wanted to be treated equally.

    Bolded 4…Can you read???? I clearly said That Yoho (who I was happily unaware even existed two weeks ago) was wrong and rude. I have also criticized Trump ad infinitum (that means a lot) for his stupid and childish tweets.

    To recap the main points………

    I said Yoho was wrong, I said AOC gave a good speech as rebuttal. I asked for clarification on "attitude."

    What's the big deal here really??

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •